Skip to content

4 - Erroneous AbatementThe timely filed TC 150 return for TY 2018 is determined to be a nullity. The valid taxpayer filed a return reporting tax of $.00 and withholding of $2,500 which posted as a TC 976. Form 14039 is included with the return. The ASED for the valid return is expired. Based on the original return, the account shows TC 150 tax of $5,000, and withholding of $6,000. A CP 2000 proposing a tax increase of $2,000 based on unreported income is issued to the valid taxpayer’s last known

Note:

Internal Revenue Manual Part 25. Special Topics · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

If the RRC (in whole or part) was applied to a tax obligation owed by the valid taxpayer (or spouse if MFJ) or offset to a TOP debt, consider that portion as received by the valid taxpayer. Use the table below to determine who received the payment when the account reflects an offset and a refund.

If

And

Then

(1) One return IDT determination,

The refund was issued by direct deposit,

The valid taxpayer did not receive the RRC.

(2) One return IDT determination,

The refund was issued by paper check or pre-paid debit card,

Review the address, including the cycle date of the last change, to determine who the payment was mailed to.

(3) Invalid/Valid determination,

The refund was issued by direct deposit,

The valid taxpayer did not receive the RRC.

(4) Invalid/Valid determination,

The refund was issued by paper check or pre-paid debit card,

Review the address, including the cycle date of the last change, to determine who the payment was mailed to.

(5) Valid/Invalid determination,

The refund was issued by direct deposit,

The valid taxpayer did receive the RRC.

(6) Valid/Invalid determination,

The refund was issued by paper check or pre-paid debit card,

Review the address, including the cycle date of the last change, to determine who the payment was mailed to.

(7) Invalid/Invalid determination,

The refund was issued by direct deposit,

The valid taxpayer did not receive the RRC.

(8) Invalid/Invalid determination,

The refund was issued by paper check or pre-paid debit card,

Review the address, including the cycle date of the last change, to determine who the payment was mailed to.

(9) Income-related IDT determination (no invalid return),

The refund was issued by direct deposit,

The valid taxpayer did receive the RRC.

(10) Income-related IDT determination (no invalid return),

The refund was issued by paper check or pre-paid debit card,

Review the address, including the cycle date of the last change, to determine who the payment was mailed to.

(11) Taxpayer is not impacted by IDT (i.e., MXEN, IJE, etc.)

The refund was issued,

Additional research is necessary. Continue to paragraph (6) below.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Manual Part 25. Special Topics

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.