9-18. OWNER APPEALS
HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook · 2026 edition · updated 2026-07-29 · United States
An Owner may appeal HUD’s Decision Letter by following the steps provided below. The Owner may not make changes to an RCS following the issuance of a Decision Letter, as the purpose of an appeal is to provide support for the conclusions reached in the original study. The HUD-commissioned RCS is not appealable following the process set out in this section, but an Owner may bring factual discrepancies or errors to HUD’s attention for possible correction as described under Section 9-14.F. All appeals of HUD’s Decision Letter, when eligible, are reviewed and decided by HUD staff at the appropriate Regional Center rather than HUD headquarters. The appeal process is as follows:
Chapter Nine – Published March 2023
32
A. Owner prepares written statement. Subsequent to submitting the Owner’s letter indicating an appeal of HUD’s decision, the Owner must submit a written statement of his/her reasons for appeal and any data that supports his/her objections. This written statement must be delivered via email to the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director within 20 calendar days after the date of HUD/CA’s initial decision as provided by Section 9-17 above. The Owner may submit one revised version of the RCS alongside the written statement.
B. Owner may request meeting. In addition to providing a written statement, the Owner may request a meeting or a conference call with the RCS review appraiser. If such a request is made, a meeting or a conference call must be held within 15 calendar days of the date of the Owner’s appeal. The Owner, the RCS appraiser, the RCS review appraiser, and the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director/designee must participate. The Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director and RCS review appraiser must consider if a field visit is needed to process the appeal as discussed in Section 9-16-C, above. In some instances, the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director and RCS review appraiser may ask for additional information from the Owner and the RCS appraiser. This information must be submitted by the Owner within 10 calendar days after the date of the meeting or conference call.
C. HUD reviews Owner’s request. The RCS review appraiser and the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director will review the Owner’s appeal, including any supplemental information submitted by the Owner, and issue a letter reporting the results of the review within 15 calendar days after the latest of the date the Owner submitted the basis for the first appeal; the date of any meeting/conference call conducted per paragraph B.; or the date by which the Owner submits additional information requested by HUD per paragraph B. HUD’s letter in response to the Owner’s first appeal must be signed by the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director, and it may accept the RCS with supplemental information submitted by the Owner, reject the Owner’s first appeal and require resubmission of a new RCS study, or propose HUD’s alternate rents for the project.
information requested by HUD per paragraph B. HUD’s letter in response to the Owner’s first appeal must be signed by the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director, and it may accept the RCS with supplemental information submitted by the Owner, reject the Owner’s first appeal and require resubmission of a new RCS study, or propose HUD’s alternate rents for the project.
E. The Owner may either accept HUD’s decision, submit a second level appeal, or withdraw the renewal request.
D. Second Level Appeal. If the Owner chooses to pursue a second level appeal, the Owner must submit a written statement of his/her reasons for a second appeal and any data that supports his/her objections to the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director’s Decision Letter in response to the Owner’s first appeal. The submission must be received within 15 calendar days after the date of the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director’s Decision Letter on the first appeal, and must be addressed to the Regional Center Office Director and must copy the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director. The Owner may also request a short-term renewal at current rents if the contract has expired or if expiration is imminent.
- The Regional Center Director will determine if the appeal has potential merit and, if so, issue a short-term renewal at then-current rents, to allow time to process the
Chapter Nine – Published March 2023
33
appeal. Any rent increases as a result of the second appeal will be made retroactively.
The Regional Center or Satellite Office Director may contact the Owner, the RCS appraiser, or the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director and/or the RCS review appraiser for clarification or additional information.
The Regional Center Director must issue a Decision Letter to the Owner within 15 calendar days after the date of the Owner’s second appeal. The letter must clearly state the basis for HUD’s decision.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code▸ Contents — HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
- U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
- SPECIAL ATTENTION OF
- TRANSMITTAL
- A. Purpose
- Explanation of Changes
- Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
- Office of Multifamily Housing
- Table of Contents
- Chapter One
- Introduction
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- Chapter 2: Section 8 Renewals
- Chapter 3: Option One: Mark-Up-To-Market
- Chapter 4: Option Two: Contract Renewals For Other Projects wi…
- Chapter 5: Option Three: Referral to Recap
- Chapter 6: Option Four: Renewal of Projects Exempt from or not…
- Chapter 7: Option Five: Renewal of Portfolio Reengineering Dem…
- Chapter 8: Option Six: Opt-Outs
- Chapter 9: Rent Comparability Studies
- Chapter 10: Residual Receipts
- Chapter 11: Tenant Issues
- Chapter 12: Physical Condition of the Project
- Chapter 13: HUD’s Refusal to Renew Section 8 Contracts
- Chapter 14: Rural Housing Service (RHS) Section 515/8
- Chapter 15: Section 8 Preservation Efforts
- — Chapter 16: “Old Regulation” State Housing Finance Agency Pr…
- 1-2. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
- 1-3. RULEMAKING
- 1-4. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
- 1-5. APPLICABILITY
- 1-6. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
- Chapter Two
- Section 8 Renewals
- 2-1. INTRODUCTION
- 2-2. OWNER OPTIONS
- 2-3. TYPES OF RENEWALS
- 2-4. EARLY TERMINATION OF A CONTRACT
- 2-5. RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY (RCS)
- Note: The AE/CA shall not lower the comparable market rents in…
- Note: A RCS is not required at any subsequent renewal of an EL…
- 2-6. CONTRACTS
- 2-8. SHORT-TERM CONTRACT RENEWALS
- 2-10. COMBINING CONTRACTS
- 2-11. REQUEST FOR A CONTRACT EXTENSION
- 2-12. DISTRIBUTIONS
- Note: The conditions listed above for receiving access to incr…
- 2-13. RENT ADJUSTMENTS
- 2-14. OPERATING COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (OCAF)
- 2-15. BUDGET-BASED RENT ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS
- 2-16. INCREASES IN DEPOSITS TO THE RESERVE FOR REPLACEMENT
- 2-17. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
- Note: If the project has a budget approved by the AE/CA less t…
- Note: HUD does not accept the RHS utility analysis. The owner …
- 2-18. WAIVERS
- 2-19. DUNS NUMBER
- Chapter Three
- 3-1. OVERVIEW
- 3-3. OPTION ONE-A ENTITLEMENT MARK-UP-TO-MARKET ELIGIBILITY
- Note: Nonprofit controlled for profit entities as described in…
- 3-4. 150 PERCENT RENT CAP FOR OPTION ONE-A
- 3-5. EXCEEDING THE 150 PERCENT OF FMR CAP
- 3-6. OPTION ONE-B DISCRETIONARY MUTM ELIGIBILITY
- Note: Non-profit owned projects that meet one of the three cri…
- 3-7. RENEWAL REQUESTS
- 3-8. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
- 3-9. ANNUAL RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT
- Chapter Four
- 4-1. ELIGIBILITY
- Note: Projects currently renewed under either Option Two or Op…
- 4-2. CONTRACT RENEWAL
- 4-3. ANNUAL RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT
- 4-4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
- Chapter Five
- Note: WAIVERS TO CHAPTER FIVE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECAP…
- Note: Risk Sharing Projects do not meet the definition of “eli…
- 5-2. BINDING COMMITMENT
- 5-3. ENTRY INTO RECAP
- Note: In cases where a CA makes the determination that contrac…
- 5-4. CONTRACT RENEWALS — RENT OR DEBT RESTRUCTURING
- 5-5. SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS
- 5-6. “WATCH LIST” MTM PROJECTS
- 5-7. GENERAL INFORMATION
- Chapter Six
- 6-1. ELIGIBILITY
- Note: State and local government financed projects that are no…
- Note: In cases where referral to Recap is necessary, CAs must …
- Note: Section 202 and 811 Capital Advance projects are not eli…
- Note: Projects financed under the risk-sharing loan programs u…
- 6-2. RENEWALS
- Reminder: For projects (including 202 projects) that are being…
- 6-3. RENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR MULTI-YEAR CONTRACTS
- 6-4. SECTION 202 REFINANCINGS
- Chapter Seven
- 7-1. ELIGIBILITY
- Portfolio Reengineering Demonstration Program Projects
- 7-2. RENEWAL OF PORTFOLIO REENGINEERING DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
- FIVE
- Note: Owners can request that the existing Demo Program Use Ag…
- 7-4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
- 7-5. PRESERVATION PROJECTS (LIHPRHA AND ELIHPA)
- 7-6. OWNER’S SUBMISSION FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS
- Note: Owners can request that the existing Preservation Use Ag…
- 7-7. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS
- 7-8. PROJECT SPECIFIC RENTS (PSRS)
- Chapter Eight
- 8-1. OVERVIEW
- 8-2. OWNER REQUIREMENTS FOR TENANT NOTIFICATION
- 8-3. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
- Note: If proper notification was not provided, the owner must …
- Chapter Nine
- 9-1. BACKGROUND
- 9-2. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER NINE
- 9-3. ROAD MAP TO CHAPTER NINE
- 9-4. ALTERNATIVES TO RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
- 9-6. METHOD TWO: COMPARING PROPOSED SECTION 8 RENTS WITH RENTS…
- 9-7. PREPARING A RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
- 9-8. APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS
- 9-9. ANALYZING THE SUBJECT PROJECT
- Note: Appraisers should not take into consideration demographi…
- Note: Government boundaries like state or county lines often d…
- 9-10. SELECTING COMPARABLE UNITS
- 9-11. COLLECTING AND DOCUMENTING DATA ON COMPARABLE UNITS
- 9-12. COMPUTING ADJUSTED RENTS FOR COMPARABLE UNITS
- 9-13. DERIVING ESTIMATED MARKET RENTS
- 9-14. PROCEDURE FOR MANDATORY MARKET RENT THRESHOLD
- Example Project in ZIP code 76469
- 9-15. HUD REVIEW OF RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
- 9-16. INITIAL AND SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW OF OWNER’S RCS
- 9-17. COMMUNICATING RESULTS OF HUD/CA REVIEWS
- 9-18. OWNER APPEALS
- 9-19. IMPOSING SANCTIONS ON APPRAISERS
- APPENDICES
- - Instructions for Completing the HUD Form 92273 S8
- Part A: Rents Charged (lines 1 through 5)
- Part B. Design, Location, Condition (lines 6 through 10)
- Part C. Unit Equipment/Amenities (lines 11 through 23)
- Part D. Site Equipment/Amenities (lines 24 through 32)
- Part E. Utilities (lines 33 through 39)
- Part F. Adjustments Recap (lines 40 through 43)
- Part G. Adjusted Rents (lines 44 through 45)
- Required Contents of a Rent Comparability Study
- Comparable Project Profile