Skip to content

9-18. OWNER APPEALS

HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook · 2026 edition · updated 2026-07-29 · United States

An Owner may appeal HUD’s Decision Letter by following the steps provided below. The Owner may not make changes to an RCS following the issuance of a Decision Letter, as the purpose of an appeal is to provide support for the conclusions reached in the original study. The HUD-commissioned RCS is not appealable following the process set out in this section, but an Owner may bring factual discrepancies or errors to HUD’s attention for possible correction as described under Section 9-14.F. All appeals of HUD’s Decision Letter, when eligible, are reviewed and decided by HUD staff at the appropriate Regional Center rather than HUD headquarters. The appeal process is as follows:

Chapter Nine – Published March 2023

32

  • A. Owner prepares written statement. Subsequent to submitting the Owner’s letter indicating an appeal of HUD’s decision, the Owner must submit a written statement of his/her reasons for appeal and any data that supports his/her objections. This written statement must be delivered via email to the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director within 20 calendar days after the date of HUD/CA’s initial decision as provided by Section 9-17 above. The Owner may submit one revised version of the RCS alongside the written statement.

  • B. Owner may request meeting. In addition to providing a written statement, the Owner may request a meeting or a conference call with the RCS review appraiser. If such a request is made, a meeting or a conference call must be held within 15 calendar days of the date of the Owner’s appeal. The Owner, the RCS appraiser, the RCS review appraiser, and the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director/designee must participate. The Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director and RCS review appraiser must consider if a field visit is needed to process the appeal as discussed in Section 9-16-C, above. In some instances, the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director and RCS review appraiser may ask for additional information from the Owner and the RCS appraiser. This information must be submitted by the Owner within 10 calendar days after the date of the meeting or conference call.

  • C. HUD reviews Owner’s request. The RCS review appraiser and the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director will review the Owner’s appeal, including any supplemental information submitted by the Owner, and issue a letter reporting the results of the review within 15 calendar days after the latest of the date the Owner submitted the basis for the first appeal; the date of any meeting/conference call conducted per paragraph B.; or the date by which the Owner submits additional information requested by HUD per paragraph B. HUD’s letter in response to the Owner’s first appeal must be signed by the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director, and it may accept the RCS with supplemental information submitted by the Owner, reject the Owner’s first appeal and require resubmission of a new RCS study, or propose HUD’s alternate rents for the project.

information requested by HUD per paragraph B. HUD’s letter in response to the Owner’s first appeal must be signed by the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director, and it may accept the RCS with supplemental information submitted by the Owner, reject the Owner’s first appeal and require resubmission of a new RCS study, or propose HUD’s alternate rents for the project.

  • E. The Owner may either accept HUD’s decision, submit a second level appeal, or withdraw the renewal request.

  • D. Second Level Appeal. If the Owner chooses to pursue a second level appeal, the Owner must submit a written statement of his/her reasons for a second appeal and any data that supports his/her objections to the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director’s Decision Letter in response to the Owner’s first appeal. The submission must be received within 15 calendar days after the date of the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director’s Decision Letter on the first appeal, and must be addressed to the Regional Center Office Director and must copy the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director. The Owner may also request a short-term renewal at current rents if the contract has expired or if expiration is imminent.

    1. The Regional Center Director will determine if the appeal has potential merit and, if so, issue a short-term renewal at then-current rents, to allow time to process the

Chapter Nine – Published March 2023

33

appeal. Any rent increases as a result of the second appeal will be made retroactively.

  1. The Regional Center or Satellite Office Director may contact the Owner, the RCS appraiser, or the Regional Center or Satellite Office Asset Management Division Director and/or the RCS review appraiser for clarification or additional information.

  2. The Regional Center Director must issue a Decision Letter to the Owner within 15 calendar days after the date of the Owner’s second appeal. The letter must clearly state the basis for HUD’s decision.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
Contents — HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
  1. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
  2. SPECIAL ATTENTION OF
  3. TRANSMITTAL
  4. A. Purpose
  5. Explanation of Changes
  6. Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
  7. Office of Multifamily Housing
  8. Table of Contents
  9. Chapter One
  10. Introduction
  11. Chapter 1: Introduction
  12. Chapter 2: Section 8 Renewals
  13. Chapter 3: Option One: Mark-Up-To-Market
  14. Chapter 4: Option Two: Contract Renewals For Other Projects wi…
  15. Chapter 5: Option Three: Referral to Recap
  16. Chapter 6: Option Four: Renewal of Projects Exempt from or not…
  17. Chapter 7: Option Five: Renewal of Portfolio Reengineering Dem…
  18. Chapter 8: Option Six: Opt-Outs
  19. Chapter 9: Rent Comparability Studies
  20. Chapter 10: Residual Receipts
  21. Chapter 11: Tenant Issues
  22. Chapter 12: Physical Condition of the Project
  23. Chapter 13: HUD’s Refusal to Renew Section 8 Contracts
  24. Chapter 14: Rural Housing Service (RHS) Section 515/8
  25. Chapter 15: Section 8 Preservation Efforts
  26. — Chapter 16: “Old Regulation” State Housing Finance Agency Pr…
  27. 1-2. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
  28. 1-3. RULEMAKING
  29. 1-4. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
  30. 1-5. APPLICABILITY
  31. 1-6. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
  32. Chapter Two
  33. Section 8 Renewals
  34. 2-1. INTRODUCTION
  35. 2-2. OWNER OPTIONS
  36. 2-3. TYPES OF RENEWALS
  37. 2-4. EARLY TERMINATION OF A CONTRACT
  38. 2-5. RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY (RCS)
  39. Note: The AE/CA shall not lower the comparable market rents in…
  40. Note: A RCS is not required at any subsequent renewal of an EL…
  41. 2-6. CONTRACTS
  42. 2-8. SHORT-TERM CONTRACT RENEWALS
  43. 2-10. COMBINING CONTRACTS
  44. 2-11. REQUEST FOR A CONTRACT EXTENSION
  45. 2-12. DISTRIBUTIONS
  46. Note: The conditions listed above for receiving access to incr…
  47. 2-13. RENT ADJUSTMENTS
  48. 2-14. OPERATING COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (OCAF)
  49. 2-15. BUDGET-BASED RENT ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS
  50. 2-16. INCREASES IN DEPOSITS TO THE RESERVE FOR REPLACEMENT
  51. 2-17. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  52. Note: If the project has a budget approved by the AE/CA less t…
  53. Note: HUD does not accept the RHS utility analysis. The owner …
  54. 2-18. WAIVERS
  55. 2-19. DUNS NUMBER
  56. Chapter Three
  57. 3-1. OVERVIEW
  58. 3-3. OPTION ONE-A ENTITLEMENT MARK-UP-TO-MARKET ELIGIBILITY
  59. Note: Nonprofit controlled for profit entities as described in…
  60. 3-4. 150 PERCENT RENT CAP FOR OPTION ONE-A
  61. 3-5. EXCEEDING THE 150 PERCENT OF FMR CAP
  62. 3-6. OPTION ONE-B DISCRETIONARY MUTM ELIGIBILITY
  63. Note: Non-profit owned projects that meet one of the three cri…
  64. 3-7. RENEWAL REQUESTS
  65. 3-8. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  66. 3-9. ANNUAL RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT
  67. Chapter Four
  68. 4-1. ELIGIBILITY
  69. Note: Projects currently renewed under either Option Two or Op…
  70. 4-2. CONTRACT RENEWAL
  71. 4-3. ANNUAL RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT
  72. 4-4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  73. Chapter Five
  74. Note: WAIVERS TO CHAPTER FIVE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECAP…
  75. Note: Risk Sharing Projects do not meet the definition of “eli…
  76. 5-2. BINDING COMMITMENT
  77. 5-3. ENTRY INTO RECAP
  78. Note: In cases where a CA makes the determination that contrac…
  79. 5-4. CONTRACT RENEWALS — RENT OR DEBT RESTRUCTURING
  80. 5-5. SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS
  81. 5-6. “WATCH LIST” MTM PROJECTS
  82. 5-7. GENERAL INFORMATION
  83. Chapter Six
  84. 6-1. ELIGIBILITY
  85. Note: State and local government financed projects that are no…
  86. Note: In cases where referral to Recap is necessary, CAs must …
  87. Note: Section 202 and 811 Capital Advance projects are not eli…
  88. Note: Projects financed under the risk-sharing loan programs u…
  89. 6-2. RENEWALS
  90. Reminder: For projects (including 202 projects) that are being…
  91. 6-3. RENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR MULTI-YEAR CONTRACTS
  92. 6-4. SECTION 202 REFINANCINGS
  93. Chapter Seven
  94. 7-1. ELIGIBILITY
  95. Portfolio Reengineering Demonstration Program Projects
  96. 7-2. RENEWAL OF PORTFOLIO REENGINEERING DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
  97. FIVE
  98. Note: Owners can request that the existing Demo Program Use Ag…
  99. 7-4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
  100. 7-5. PRESERVATION PROJECTS (LIHPRHA AND ELIHPA)
  101. 7-6. OWNER’S SUBMISSION FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS
  102. Note: Owners can request that the existing Preservation Use Ag…
  103. 7-7. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS
  104. 7-8. PROJECT SPECIFIC RENTS (PSRS)
  105. Chapter Eight
  106. 8-1. OVERVIEW
  107. 8-2. OWNER REQUIREMENTS FOR TENANT NOTIFICATION
  108. 8-3. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  109. Note: If proper notification was not provided, the owner must …
  110. Chapter Nine
  111. 9-1. BACKGROUND
  112. 9-2. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER NINE
  113. 9-3. ROAD MAP TO CHAPTER NINE
  114. 9-4. ALTERNATIVES TO RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
  115. 9-6. METHOD TWO: COMPARING PROPOSED SECTION 8 RENTS WITH RENTS…
  116. 9-7. PREPARING A RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
  117. 9-8. APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS
  118. 9-9. ANALYZING THE SUBJECT PROJECT
  119. Note: Appraisers should not take into consideration demographi…
  120. Note: Government boundaries like state or county lines often d…
  121. 9-10. SELECTING COMPARABLE UNITS
  122. 9-11. COLLECTING AND DOCUMENTING DATA ON COMPARABLE UNITS
  123. 9-12. COMPUTING ADJUSTED RENTS FOR COMPARABLE UNITS
  124. 9-13. DERIVING ESTIMATED MARKET RENTS
  125. 9-14. PROCEDURE FOR MANDATORY MARKET RENT THRESHOLD
  126. Example Project in ZIP code 76469
  127. 9-15. HUD REVIEW OF RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
  128. 9-16. INITIAL AND SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW OF OWNER’S RCS
  129. 9-17. COMMUNICATING RESULTS OF HUD/CA REVIEWS
  130. 9-18. OWNER APPEALS
  131. 9-19. IMPOSING SANCTIONS ON APPRAISERS
  132. APPENDICES
  133. - Instructions for Completing the HUD Form 92273 S8
  134. Part A: Rents Charged (lines 1 through 5)
  135. Part B. Design, Location, Condition (lines 6 through 10)
  136. Part C. Unit Equipment/Amenities (lines 11 through 23)
  137. Part D. Site Equipment/Amenities (lines 24 through 32)
  138. Part E. Utilities (lines 33 through 39)
  139. Part F. Adjustments Recap (lines 40 through 43)
  140. Part G. Adjusted Rents (lines 44 through 45)
  141. Required Contents of a Rent Comparability Study
  142. Comparable Project Profile

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.