Skip to content

9-15. HUD REVIEW OF RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY

HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook · 2026 edition · updated 2026-07-29 · United States

This Section provides guidance to HUD/CAs on how to review an Owner’s RCS prepared and submitted in accordance with Sections 9-7 through 9-14. When referring to a particular staff position, this Section uses titles typically used at HUD. CAs should translate those to their own position titles.

This Section also defines categories of reviewers. Initial reviewers are HUD/CA staff. Substantive reviewers are required to be state-certified appraisers for all reviews conducted by CAs, or HUD appraisers for those completed by HUD’s Multifamily Regional Centers and Satellite Offices (such substantive reviewers are also referred to as RCS review appraisers). For instance, where HUD’s staffing does not permit the availability of a HUD appraiser, a nonappraiser HUD staff person can complete the substantive review, subject to the minimum requirements and process outlined below.

  • A. Minimum qualifications for reviewers. Each RCS must be reviewed by staff members who possess the requisite knowledge needed for the level of review being performed. Section 9-16 provides guidance on the level of reviews.

    1. Initial Screening. An initial review for timeliness and completeness shall be completed by a HUD/CA initial reviewer using the checklist provided under Appendix 9-5. While completing this review, the HUD/CA initial reviewer must adhere to the policies and timeframes set forth in this Chapter’s guidance. The HUD/CA initial reviewer must also have read this Chapter and Appendices within the preceding 12 months of performing their first initial screening review.

    2. Substantive Review. All substantive reviews conducted by CAs must be completed by a state-certified general appraiser. Substantive reviews completed by HUD staff should ideally be completed by HUD appraisers. However, a non-appraiser

Chapter Nine – Published March 2023

28

substantive reviewer from HUD staff may complete the substantive review if they meet the following minimum qualifications:

  - a. Have a minimum of two years’ direct multifamily experience. Besides direct experience in HUD multifamily review, other acceptable qualifying experience would be two years’ employment in multifamily project management or leasing, multifamily loan or acquisition underwriting, or multifamily development. This background is necessary to effectively review the RCS facts, reasoning, and conclusions; and 

  - b. Have read this Chapter and Appendices within the preceding 12 months of performing their first substantive review. 
  • B. Process for approving non-appraiser substantive reviewers. The Regional Center Director must authorize all non-appraiser substantive reviewers performing substantive reviews on RCSs within their region.

  • C. Timing requirements. An initial screening review using the checklist in Appendix 9-5 must be completed within 10 calendar days of the date of receipt of an RCS from the Owner. The HUD/CA initial reviewer may contact the RCS appraiser directly unless the Owner has specifically objected to that in the Owner’s cover letter (as required under Section 9-7). The HUD/CA initial reviewer must follow up with the Owner or RCS appraiser, by email or other form of written correspondence, if:

    1. The Owner’s submission is incomplete. The RCS appraiser or the Owner must submit the missing items within 10 calendar days of the HUD/CA initial reviewer’s request. If the materials are not submitted, the renewal process is considered abandoned and the Owner must make a complete submission to initiate the process again. The Owner may request an extension to this deadline in writing, and HUD shall grant it for good cause.

    2. More than 90 calendar days elapsed between the RCS appraiser’s transmittal letter and the date the Owner first submitted the RCS to either HUD or the CA. Under this scenario, the HUD/CA initial reviewer must return the RCS and ask the Owner to have the RCS appraiser update the data to comply with Section 9-8.

  • D. Recordkeeping. All categories of reviewers must retain the RCS submission, subsequent correspondence with the Owner, and all materials and documentation for 3 years from the date of the Owner’s RCS submission. This retention requirement applies equally to RCS materials that were deemed inadequate and/or incomplete.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
Contents — HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
HUD Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
  1. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
  2. SPECIAL ATTENTION OF
  3. TRANSMITTAL
  4. A. Purpose
  5. Explanation of Changes
  6. Section 8 Renewal Policy Guidebook
  7. Office of Multifamily Housing
  8. Table of Contents
  9. Chapter One
  10. Introduction
  11. Chapter 1: Introduction
  12. Chapter 2: Section 8 Renewals
  13. Chapter 3: Option One: Mark-Up-To-Market
  14. Chapter 4: Option Two: Contract Renewals For Other Projects wi…
  15. Chapter 5: Option Three: Referral to Recap
  16. Chapter 6: Option Four: Renewal of Projects Exempt from or not…
  17. Chapter 7: Option Five: Renewal of Portfolio Reengineering Dem…
  18. Chapter 8: Option Six: Opt-Outs
  19. Chapter 9: Rent Comparability Studies
  20. Chapter 10: Residual Receipts
  21. Chapter 11: Tenant Issues
  22. Chapter 12: Physical Condition of the Project
  23. Chapter 13: HUD’s Refusal to Renew Section 8 Contracts
  24. Chapter 14: Rural Housing Service (RHS) Section 515/8
  25. Chapter 15: Section 8 Preservation Efforts
  26. — Chapter 16: “Old Regulation” State Housing Finance Agency Pr…
  27. 1-2. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
  28. 1-3. RULEMAKING
  29. 1-4. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
  30. 1-5. APPLICABILITY
  31. 1-6. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
  32. Chapter Two
  33. Section 8 Renewals
  34. 2-1. INTRODUCTION
  35. 2-2. OWNER OPTIONS
  36. 2-3. TYPES OF RENEWALS
  37. 2-4. EARLY TERMINATION OF A CONTRACT
  38. 2-5. RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY (RCS)
  39. Note: The AE/CA shall not lower the comparable market rents in…
  40. Note: A RCS is not required at any subsequent renewal of an EL…
  41. 2-6. CONTRACTS
  42. 2-8. SHORT-TERM CONTRACT RENEWALS
  43. 2-10. COMBINING CONTRACTS
  44. 2-11. REQUEST FOR A CONTRACT EXTENSION
  45. 2-12. DISTRIBUTIONS
  46. Note: The conditions listed above for receiving access to incr…
  47. 2-13. RENT ADJUSTMENTS
  48. 2-14. OPERATING COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (OCAF)
  49. 2-15. BUDGET-BASED RENT ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS
  50. 2-16. INCREASES IN DEPOSITS TO THE RESERVE FOR REPLACEMENT
  51. 2-17. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  52. Note: If the project has a budget approved by the AE/CA less t…
  53. Note: HUD does not accept the RHS utility analysis. The owner …
  54. 2-18. WAIVERS
  55. 2-19. DUNS NUMBER
  56. Chapter Three
  57. 3-1. OVERVIEW
  58. 3-3. OPTION ONE-A ENTITLEMENT MARK-UP-TO-MARKET ELIGIBILITY
  59. Note: Nonprofit controlled for profit entities as described in…
  60. 3-4. 150 PERCENT RENT CAP FOR OPTION ONE-A
  61. 3-5. EXCEEDING THE 150 PERCENT OF FMR CAP
  62. 3-6. OPTION ONE-B DISCRETIONARY MUTM ELIGIBILITY
  63. Note: Non-profit owned projects that meet one of the three cri…
  64. 3-7. RENEWAL REQUESTS
  65. 3-8. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  66. 3-9. ANNUAL RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT
  67. Chapter Four
  68. 4-1. ELIGIBILITY
  69. Note: Projects currently renewed under either Option Two or Op…
  70. 4-2. CONTRACT RENEWAL
  71. 4-3. ANNUAL RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING A MULTIYEAR CONTRACT
  72. 4-4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  73. Chapter Five
  74. Note: WAIVERS TO CHAPTER FIVE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECAP…
  75. Note: Risk Sharing Projects do not meet the definition of “eli…
  76. 5-2. BINDING COMMITMENT
  77. 5-3. ENTRY INTO RECAP
  78. Note: In cases where a CA makes the determination that contrac…
  79. 5-4. CONTRACT RENEWALS — RENT OR DEBT RESTRUCTURING
  80. 5-5. SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS
  81. 5-6. “WATCH LIST” MTM PROJECTS
  82. 5-7. GENERAL INFORMATION
  83. Chapter Six
  84. 6-1. ELIGIBILITY
  85. Note: State and local government financed projects that are no…
  86. Note: In cases where referral to Recap is necessary, CAs must …
  87. Note: Section 202 and 811 Capital Advance projects are not eli…
  88. Note: Projects financed under the risk-sharing loan programs u…
  89. 6-2. RENEWALS
  90. Reminder: For projects (including 202 projects) that are being…
  91. 6-3. RENT ADJUSTMENTS FOR MULTI-YEAR CONTRACTS
  92. 6-4. SECTION 202 REFINANCINGS
  93. Chapter Seven
  94. 7-1. ELIGIBILITY
  95. Portfolio Reengineering Demonstration Program Projects
  96. 7-2. RENEWAL OF PORTFOLIO REENGINEERING DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
  97. FIVE
  98. Note: Owners can request that the existing Demo Program Use Ag…
  99. 7-4. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
  100. 7-5. PRESERVATION PROJECTS (LIHPRHA AND ELIHPA)
  101. 7-6. OWNER’S SUBMISSION FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS
  102. Note: Owners can request that the existing Preservation Use Ag…
  103. 7-7. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS
  104. 7-8. PROJECT SPECIFIC RENTS (PSRS)
  105. Chapter Eight
  106. 8-1. OVERVIEW
  107. 8-2. OWNER REQUIREMENTS FOR TENANT NOTIFICATION
  108. 8-3. PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS
  109. Note: If proper notification was not provided, the owner must …
  110. Chapter Nine
  111. 9-1. BACKGROUND
  112. 9-2. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER NINE
  113. 9-3. ROAD MAP TO CHAPTER NINE
  114. 9-4. ALTERNATIVES TO RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
  115. 9-6. METHOD TWO: COMPARING PROPOSED SECTION 8 RENTS WITH RENTS…
  116. 9-7. PREPARING A RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
  117. 9-8. APPRAISER QUALIFICATIONS
  118. 9-9. ANALYZING THE SUBJECT PROJECT
  119. Note: Appraisers should not take into consideration demographi…
  120. Note: Government boundaries like state or county lines often d…
  121. 9-10. SELECTING COMPARABLE UNITS
  122. 9-11. COLLECTING AND DOCUMENTING DATA ON COMPARABLE UNITS
  123. 9-12. COMPUTING ADJUSTED RENTS FOR COMPARABLE UNITS
  124. 9-13. DERIVING ESTIMATED MARKET RENTS
  125. 9-14. PROCEDURE FOR MANDATORY MARKET RENT THRESHOLD
  126. Example Project in ZIP code 76469
  127. 9-15. HUD REVIEW OF RENT COMPARABILITY STUDY
  128. 9-16. INITIAL AND SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW OF OWNER’S RCS
  129. 9-17. COMMUNICATING RESULTS OF HUD/CA REVIEWS
  130. 9-18. OWNER APPEALS
  131. 9-19. IMPOSING SANCTIONS ON APPRAISERS
  132. APPENDICES
  133. - Instructions for Completing the HUD Form 92273 S8
  134. Part A: Rents Charged (lines 1 through 5)
  135. Part B. Design, Location, Condition (lines 6 through 10)
  136. Part C. Unit Equipment/Amenities (lines 11 through 23)
  137. Part D. Site Equipment/Amenities (lines 24 through 32)
  138. Part E. Utilities (lines 33 through 39)
  139. Part F. Adjustments Recap (lines 40 through 43)
  140. Part G. Adjusted Rents (lines 44 through 45)
  141. Required Contents of a Rent Comparability Study
  142. Comparable Project Profile

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.