Skip to content

Introduction

SECTION 21. RETROACTIVE

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2013-18 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

REMEDIAL AMENDMENT

.01 Effective January 1, 2009, a contract (that is, an annuity contract, custodial account, or retirement income account) does not satisfy the requirements of § 403(b) unless the contract is maintained pursuant to a written plan that, in both form and operation, satisfies the requirements of the 2007 regulations. The transition relief in Notice 2009–3 sets forth conditions under which a § 403(b) plan will not be treated as failing to satisfy the requirements of § 403(b) during the 2009 calendar year. The relief in Notice 2009–3 applies solely with respect to the 2009 calendar year. .02 This section 21 allows an eligible employer to retroactively correct defects in the form of its written § 403(b) plan (including any defects in documents incorporated by reference into the plan) in order to satisfy the written plan requirement in the 2007 regulations by timely adopting a § 403(b) pre-approved plan or by otherwise timely amending its plan. For this purpose, a defect in the form of a plan is a provision, or the absence of a required provision, that causes the plan to fail to satisfy the requirements of § 403(b). Under this remedial amendment provision, an eligible employer must amend its plan to the extent necessary to correct any form defects retroactive to the first day of the plan’s remedial amendment period. For this purpose, “the first day of the plan’s remedial amendment period” means the later of January 1, 2010, or the effective date of the plan.

.03 The form of a plan will be treated as satisfying the requirements of the 2007 regulations as of the first day of the plan’s remedial amendment period if (1) on or before such day, the eligible employer adopts a written plan that is intended to satisfy the requirements of § 403(b), and (2) on or before the last day of the re

they cannot be reviewed in a reasonable amount of time. A plan may be considered not to be in substantial compliance if, for example, it omits an applicable Code section, contains conflicting provisions, or merely incorporates by reference an applicable Code section. The Service will not consider these plans until after they are revised, and they will be treated as new requests as of the date they are resubmitted. No additional user fee will be charged if an inadequate submission is amended to be in substantial compliance and is resubmitted to the Service within 30 days following the date the pre-approved plan sponsor is notified of the inadequacy.

.09 If the plan document submitted as part of an opinion or advisory letter request contains a provision that gives rise to an issue for which the Service determines that contrary published authority exists, failure to disclose and address the significant contrary authority may result in requests for additional information, which will delay action on the request.

.10 An opinion or advisory letter issued to a pre-approved plan sponsor is not transferable to any other entity. For this purpose, a change of employer identification number is deemed to be a change of entity.

.11 A change only in a pre-approved plan sponsor’s name is not deemed to be a change of entity. However, the pre-approved plan sponsor must notify the Service in writing of the change in name and certify that it still meets the conditions for sponsorship described in section 11. No opinion or advisory letter will be issued and no user fee will be required for a mere change in name.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2013-18

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.