Part XVI›Article 11 — PRESERVATION OF BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS OF ARCHITECTURAL, HISTORICAL, AND AESTHETIC IMPORTANCE IN THE C-3 DI›SEC. 1125. SEVERABILITY.
APPENDIX J TO ARTICLE 11
San Francisco Planning Code · 2026-08 edition · updated 2026-09-09 · San Francisco
PINE-SANSOME CONSERVATION DISTRICT
SEC. 1. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
It is hereby found that the area known and described in this Appendix as the "Pine-Sansome Street area" is a Subarea within the C-3 District that possesses concentrations of buildings that together create a Subarea of architectural quality and importance which contributes to the beauty and attractiveness of the City. It is further found that the area meets the
standards for designation of a Conservation District as set forth in Section 1103 of Article 11 and that the designation of said area as a Conservation District will be in furtherance of and in conformance with the purposes of Article 11 of the City Planning Code.
This designation is intended to promote the health, safety, prosperity and welfare of the people of the City through the effectuation of the purposes set forth in Section 1101 of Article 11 and the maintenance of the scale and character of the Pine-Sansome area by:
(a) The protection and preservation of the basic characteristics and salient architectural details of structures insofar as these characteristics and details are compatible with the Conservation District;
(b) Providing scope for the continuing vitality of the District through private renewal and architectural creativity, within appropriate controls and standards;
(c) Encouragement of the continued intensive use of the District for financial and business office activities. (Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION.
Pursuant to Section 1103.1 of Article 11, of the City Planning Code (Part II, Chapter XI of the San Francisco Municipal Code), the Pine-Sansome area is hereby designated as a Conservation District. (Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 3. LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES.
The location and boundaries of the Pine-Sansome Conservation District shall be as designated on the Pine-Sansome Conservation District Map, the original of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors under File No. 22384-4, which Map is hereby incorporated herein as though fully set forth, and a facsimile of which is reproduced hereinbelow.
(Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 4. RELATION TO CITY PLANNING CODE.
(a) Article 11 of the City Planning Code is the basic law governing preservation of buildings and districts of architectural importance in the C-3 District of the City and County of San Francisco. This Appendix is subject to and in addition to the provisions thereof.
(b) Except as may be specifically provided to the contrary in this Code, nothing in this Appendix shall supercede, impair or modify any City Planning Code provisions applicable to property in the Pine-Sansome Conservation District, including, but not limited to, regulations controlling uses, height, bulk, coverage, floor area ratio, required open space, offstreet parking and signs.
(Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 5. JUSTIFICATION.
The characteristics of the Conservation District justifying its designation are as follows:
(a) History of the District. The flat land-filled area east of Montgomery Street became an early center of household furnishings on Pine Street and hotels on Sansome Street. The block of Leidesdorff Street near Pine was once known as Pauper's Alley. By 1875, financial offices from nearby Montgomery Street had located in the area. A stock exchange subdistrict, established in the late 1870's, included the Stock and Exchange Board, the Pacific Exchange and the California Stock Exchange. This District remained largely intact until the Earthquake and Fire of 1906 when two of the exchanges
located elsewhere. In the 1920's, as banks moved their offices north along Montgomery Street, some banks and more insurance companies located on Pine Street near Sansome.
When the U.S. Subtreasury Building added its 12-story office extension in the late 1920's, the district largely assumed its present architectural character. The replacement of the Subtreasury by the Pacific Coast Stock Exchange in the 1930's, one of the most important financial institutions in the Western United States, was an important factor in solidifying the District's status as a financial center. Ever since then the area has played an important role in the financial life of the City.
(b) Basic Nature of the District. The distinguishing characteristic of the District is the relationship between the street and alley network and the series of distinguished office and financial buildings from the early part of the twentieth century. Buildings are defined and set off from each other by an intricate network of public and private alleys. Although most buildings are built to the property lines, in several cases alleys divide their facades. The network of alleys creates open spaces between buildings which distinguishes the District from other parts of the downtown. The rhythm of buildings and street spaces establishes a human scale in the District. Another definitive feature is the Pacific Coast Stock Exchange, set back from the street upon a base of broad steps. Since the building's forecourt provides an intimate open space with adequate sunshine, it is a popular daytime gathering place.
(c) Architectural Character. The buildings in the District are of high design quality, executed in a variety of ornamental styles. Examples of Classical Moderne, Skyscraper Gothic, Gothic, Georgian Revival, as well as the more familiar buildings derived from Renaissance sources, create a rich mix of twentieth century styles.
(d) Uniqueness and Location. Near the western edge of the financial district, the District is a large intact example of early twentieth century office architecture in the financial district. Aside from other assemblages of historic office buildings on California and Montgomery Streets, the Pine Sansome district is one of the only remaining areas where an entire pre-World War II streetscape is intact.
iqueness and Location.** Near the western edge of the financial district, the District is a large intact example of early twentieth century office architecture in the financial district. Aside from other assemblages of historic office buildings on California and Montgomery Streets, the Pine Sansome district is one of the only remaining areas where an entire pre-World War II streetscape is intact.
(e) Visual and Functional Unity. The area has a coherent character created by similar small to moderate scale buildings executed in like materials and colors, and situated on interconnected alleys and small lots. The series of buildings on the south side of Pine Street is constructed out of grey granite, or terra cotta fired to resemble granite. (f) Dynamic Continuity. The District has been and continues to be an active part of the financial district. It contains a variety of uses, including offices, banks, services, retail establishments and small restaurants.
(g) Benefits to the City and its Residents. The District provides a variety of benefits to the City and its residents. A range of commercial services are located within the District, including the City's stock exchange, and a number of examples of pre-1930 office development.
(Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 6. FEATURES.
The exterior architectural features of the Pine-Sansome Conservation District are as follows:
(a) Massing and Composition. For the most part, the buildings are two- or three-part vertical compositions. In more elaborate designs transitional stories create a stacked composition, but the design effect is similar. In addition, buildings are often divided through fenestration or other detailing into bays to express their internal structure. A common compositional device in the District is the emphasis placed upon the central bays.
The massing of the structures is usually a simple vertically oriented rectangle with a ratio of width to height generally from 1:2 to 1:6, an important characteristic of the District. The building heights range from 45 feet to 200 feet. Building frontages are relatively consistent, generally ranging from 40 feet to 75 feet. In addition, continuous streetwall heights are a characteristic of the west side of Pine Street. The heights of the buildings step down towards the west. With the exception of the Pacific Coast Stock Exchange, the buildings in the Pine-Sansome Conservation District are built to the front property line and occupy the entire site.
(b) Scale. The buildings are of small to moderate scale with bay widths generally from 20 feet to 30 feet. Wider frontages are often broken up by articulation of the facade, making the buildings appear narrower. The street frontages are
broken up by the aforementioned alleys, further limiting the scale of the District. The base is generally delineated from the rest of the building, giving the District an intimate scale at the street.
(c) Materials and Colors. Buildings are constructed of masonry or terra cotta, or various shades of brick. The buildings are light-colored grays or cream colors, with some red brick buildings. Through the use of rich detailing, often executed in deep relief, textural facades are emphasized.
(d) Detail and Ornamentation. The buildings in the District are richly detailed in a wide variety of styles for such a small area. Ornamental types include rich sculptural groups in the Moderne style, bas reliefs, rusticated bases, colonades, pointed and round headed arches, bracketed cornices, belt courses, and decorative keystones. (Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 7. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW OF NEW CONSTRUCTION AND CERTAIN ALTERATIONS.
(a) Standards. Within Conservation Districts, all construction of new buildings and all major alterations, which are subject to the provisions of Sections 1110, 1111 through 1111.6 and 1113, shall be compatible with the District in general with respect to the building's composition and massing, scale, materials and colors, and detailing and ornamentation, including those features described in Section 6 of this Appendix. Emphasis shall be placed on compatibility with those buildings in the area in which the new or altered building is located. In the case of major alterations, only those building characteristics that are affected by the proposed alteration shall be considered in assessing compatibility. Signs on buildings in Conservation Districts are subject to the provisions of Section 1111.7.
The foregoing standards do not require, or even encourage, new buildings to imitate the styles of the past. Rather, they require the new to be compatible with the old. The determination of compatibility shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 309.
(b) Guidelines. The guidelines in this Subsection are to be used in assessing compatibility.
(1) Composition and Massing. New construction should maintain the character of the District by relating to the prevailing height, mass, proportions, rhythm and composition of existing historic buildings.
The height and massing of new buildings should not alter the traditional scale of existing buildings, streets and open spaces. Existing streetwall heights should be maintained. An appropriate streetwall height is established by reference to the prevailing building height on the block and especially to that of adjacent buildings. If the adjacent buildings are of a significantly different height than the rest of the buildings on the block, then the prevailing height of buildings on the block should be used as a guide. A setback at the streetwall height can permit additional height above the setback without breaking the continuity of the streetwall.
Most existing buildings are built to the street or alley line. This pattern should not be broken since it could damage the continuity of building rhythms and the definition of streets.
The standard proportions for new buildings should be established by the prevailing streetwall height and width of lots. Lot assembly should be discouraged to maintain the existing lot pattern. In cases where lots are combined, facades of new buildings should be broken into discrete elements that relate to prevailing building proportions. The use of smaller bays can be used to relate the proportions of a new building with those of historic buildings.
The design of a new structure should repeat the prevailing pattern of two- and three-part vertical compositions. (2) Scale. A major influence on scale is the degree to which the total facade plane is broken into smaller parts which relate to human scale. The existing scale of the immediate area and the Conservation District should be maintained by a consistent use of size and complexity of detailing with regard to surrounding buildings, and the continuance of existing bay widths. Base elements (of similar height to existing bases) should be used to maintain a sense of human scale on streets and sidewalks. Large wall surfaces, which increase a building's scale, should be broken up through the use of detailing and textural variation to reduce the scale.
Existing fenestration (windows, entrances) rhythms and proportions which have been established by lot width or bay width should be repeated in new structures. The spacing and size of window openings should follow the sequence set by
existing structures. Large glass areas should be broken up by mullions so that the scale of glazed areas is compatible with that of neighboring buildings.
(3) Materials and Colors. The use of like materials can relate two buildings of obviously different eras and styles. The use of materials that appear similar (such as substituting concrete for terra cotta) can link two disparate structures, or harmonize the appearance of a new structure with the architectural character of a Conservation District.
The preferred surface materials for this District are brick, terra cotta, stone, and concrete (simulated to look like terra cotta or stone). New buildings should use more than one facade material to repeat the pattern prevalent in existing structures. Since the common colors of the District are those of red brick and grey stone, these colors as well as earth tones should be used in new construction.
(4) Detailing and Ornamentation. A new building should relate to the surrounding area by picking up elements from surrounding buildings and repeating them or developing them for new purposes. Ornamental details, such as columns, lintels and arches, can be taken from an adjacent building and used in a new building to relate the latter to the surrounding area. Similarly shaped forms can be used without directly copying historical ornament. The new structure should incorporate prevailing cornice lines, belt courses or rusticated bases and may use a modern vernacular instead of that of the original model.
(Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
SEC. 8. TDR; ELIGIBILITY OF CATEGORY V BUILDINGS.
Category V Buildings in the Pine-Sansome District are eligible for the transfer of TDR as provided in Section 1109(c). (Added Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85)
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code▸Contents — San Francisco Planning Code
- Article 1 — GENERAL ZONING PROVISIONS
- Article 1.2 — DIMENSIONS, AREAS, AND OPEN SPACES
- Article 1.5 — TRANSPORTATION, OFF-STREET PARKING, AND LOADING
- Article 1.7 — COMPLIANCE
- Article 2 — USE DISTRICTS
- Article 6
- Article 2.5 — HEIGHT AND BULK DISTRICTS
- Article 3 — ZONING PROCEDURES
- Article 3.5 — FEES
- Article 4 — DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS T…
- Article 6 — SIGNS
- Article 7 — NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
- Article 8 — MIXED USE DISTRICTS
- Article 9 — MISSION BAY DISTRICTS
- Part I
- Part II
- Part III
- Part IV
- Part V
- Part VI
- Part VII
- Part VIII
- Part IX
- Part X
- Part XI
- Part XII
- Part XIII
- Part XIV
- Part XV
▸Part XVI
Overview- Article 10 — PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL ARCHITECTURAL AND AEST…
▸Article 11 — PRESERVATION OF BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS OF ARCHIT…
- Article 12 — [RESERVED]