Skip to content

Department of Housing and Community Development

Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process Guidelines (final updated) · 2026 edition · updated 2026-07-29 · California

  • (5) Timeframes for determining project eligibility for a density bonus concession, incentive, parking reduction, or waiver of development standards or protections of the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 65589.5) shall be subject to the timeframes outlined in paragraph (2) and (3) above.

==> picture [14 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

  • Modifications to the development subsequent to the approval of the ministerial review, but prior to issuance of a final building permit, shall be granted in the following circumstances:

  • (1) For modification initiated by the development proponent.

    • (A) Following approval of an application under the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Review Process, but prior to issuance of the final building permit required for construction of the development, an applicant may submit a written request to modify the development. The modification must conform with the following:

      • i. The change is consistent with the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process Guidelines.

      • ii. The change is consistent with the objective planning standards specified in subdivision (a) that were in effect when the original development application was first submitted.

      • iii. The change will not conflict with a plan, ordinance or policy addressing community health and safety.

      • iv. If the change results in modifications to the concessions, incentives or waivers to development standards approved pursuant to Density Bonus Law, then the modified concession, incentive, or waiver must continue to meet the standards of the Density Bonus Law.

      • v. The local government may apply objective planning standards adopted after the development application was first submitted to the requested modification in any of the following instances:

        • I. The development is revised such that the total number of residential units or total square footage of construction changes by 15 percent or more.

        • II. The development is revised such that the total number of residential units or total square footage of construction changes by 5 percent or more, and it is necessary to subject the development to an objective standard beyond those in effect when the development application was submitted in order to mitigate or avoid a specific, adverse impact, as that term is defined in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (j) of Section 65589.5, upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible alternative method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact.

        • III. Objective building standards contained in the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including, but not limited to, building plumbing, electrical, fire, and grading codes, may be applied to all modifications.

Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process Guidelines

Page 14

Department of Housing and Community Development

  • (B) Upon receipt of the request, the local agency shall determine if the requested modification is consistent with the local agency’s objective standards in effect when the original application for the development was submitted. The local agency shall not reconsider consistency with objective planning standards that are not affected by the proposed modification. Approval of the modification request must be completed within 60 days of submittal of the modification or 90 days if design review is required. A proposed modification shall not cause the original approval to terminate.

    • (C) The local government’s review of a modification request pursuant to this subdivision shall be strictly limited to determining whether the modification, including any modification to previously approved density bonus concessions or waivers, modify the development’s consistency with the objective planning standards and shall not reconsider prior determinations that are not affected by the modification.
  • (2) For modification initiated by the local agency.

    • (A) Following approval of an application under the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process, but prior to issuance of a building permit for the development, a local agency may require one-time changes to the development that are necessary to comply with the objective building standards contained in the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including, but not limited to, building plumbing, electrical, fire, and grading codes, or to mitigate a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without modifying the development. A “specific, adverse impact” has the meaning defined in Government Code section 65589.5(d)(2). Any local standard adopted after submission of a development application, including locally adopted construction codes, shall not be considered an "objective zoning standard," “objective subdivision standard," or "objective design review standard" that is applicable to a development application.

    • (B) A determination that a change is required is a ministerial action. If a revised application is required to address these modifications, the application shall be reviewed as a ministerial approval within 60 days of re-submittal of the application.

==> picture [15 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

  • If a local government approves a development under the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process, notwithstanding any other law, the following expiration of approval timeframes apply:

    • (1) If the project includes public investment in housing affordability, beyond tax credits, where 50 percent of the units are affordable to households making at or below 80 percent of the AMI, then that approval shall not expire.
  • (2) If the project does not include public investment in housing affordability (including local, state, or federal government assistance) beyond tax credits, and at least 50 percent of the units are not affordable to households making at or below 80 percent of the AMI, that approval shall remain valid for three years from the date of the final action establishing that approval, or if litigation is filed challenging that approval,

Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process Guidelines

Page 15

Department of Housing and Community Development

from the date of the final judgment upholding that approval. Approval shall remain valid for a project provided that vertical construction of the development has begun and is in progress. “In progress” means one of the following:

  • (A) The construction has begun and has not ceased for more than 180 days.

  • (B) If the development requires multiple building permits, an initial phase has been completed, and the project proponent has applied for and is diligently pursuing a building permit for a subsequent phase, provided that once it has been issued, the building permit for the subsequent phase does not lapse.

  • (3) The development may receive a one-time, one-year extension if the project proponent provides documentation that there has been significant progress toward getting the development construction ready, such as filing a building permit application. The local government’s action and discretion in determining whether to grant the foregoing extension shall be limited to considerations and processes set forth in this section.

==> picture [15 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

  • A local government shall issue subsequent permits as defined in Section 102(aa) required for a development approved under the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process if the application for those permits substantially complies with the development as it was approved. Upon receipt of an application for a subsequent permit, the local government shall process the permit without unreasonable delay and shall not impose any procedure or requirement that is not imposed on projects that are not approved using the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process. Issuance of subsequent permits shall implement the approved development, and review of the permit application shall not inhibit, chill, or preclude the development. For purposes of this subsection “unreasonable delay” means permit processing times that are longer than other similar permit requests for projects not approved using the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process.

NOTE: Authority cited: Government Code section 65913.4(-l). Reference cited: Government Code section 65913.4(a), (b), (c), (d), (g), (h), (j), and (m).

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
Contents — Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process Guidelines (final updated)

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.