Local zoning · Kerman

Kerman — Historic Preservation

Q: Is there a Kerman process for designating local landmarks or a historic district?

Not in the retrieved Title 17. Chapter 17.32 (Historic Preservation) is listed as (Reserved) , and no local landmark/district procedure appears in the retrieved materials. To pursue designation you would need to ask planning staff or seek an ordinance amendment. § 17.32 — (Reserved) .

Q: How does the code define a historic or “significant” building?

A “significant building” is defined to include buildings at least 50 years old , buildings listed on the National or California Registers, or buildings the council determines are notably associated with local historic persons/events. See the definitions under § 17.120 (Definitions). § 17.120 .

Q: Will an ADU on an older property be treated differently if the house is “significant”?

ADUs are governed by the ADU chapter ( § 17.40.010 ) and state ADU law; the zoning code does not show a separate historic exemption for ADUs in retrieved materials. If the project triggers site plan review for design or expansion, that review will apply. Verify historic‑resource treatment with planning staff. § 17.40.010 .

Q: Do I need design review for exterior work on an old building?

If the work is within the categories that require site plan review or development plan review (new construction, more than a threshold increase, or located in a combined zone), then design elements will be examined under those review processes; see § 17.80 and § 17.96 . Minor repairs to single‑unit dwellings in R‑1 are often exempt per § 17.80.020(B)(1) . §§ 17.80, 17.96 .

Historic Preservation under the Kerman local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.

Ask a question free See coverage

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026

Overview

Kerman’s zoning code currently contains a placeholder chapter for local preservation but no active local preservation program: Chapter 17.32 (Historic Preservation) is shown as (Reserved) in the City’s Title 17 zoning code. The code does, however, contain a definition for “significant building” and an express sign-regulation exception that treats historically‑significant signs differently. Where preservation matters intersect development review (setbacks, design review, parking, etc.), applicants follow the city’s normal zoning and design-review procedures. Verify parcel-specific historic status with the city; the zoning code does not establish a local landmark designation or local historic‑district map in the materials retrieved.

What the code actually says (deep synthesis, grounded)

Local preservation chapter status — reserved
- Chapter 17.32 (Historic Preservation) is currently (Reserved); there are no active local procedures, review standards, or a local landmark/district designation spelled out in that chapter in the retrieved code. § 17.32 (Historic Preservation) — (Reserved).
Definitions and what qualifies as historically important
- The code defines a “significant building” (building at least 50 years old, or listed on the National or California registers, or recognized by the council for local historic association). See § 17.120 (definitions under the S‑block for “significant building”). § 17.120 (Definitions) — definition of “Significant building.”
Signage special rule for historic signs
- The sign chapter allows a narrow exception for historical/significant signs (for signs within areas listed or eligible for the National Register, or in an historical landmark/zone) — see § 17.30.120(B)(2) for the “historical significance” exception (treatment of historic signs). § 17.30.120 (Nonconforming signs / historical sign exception).
How preservation issues are handled practically today
- Because the preservation chapter is reserved, any work that affects an older or potentially historic building is regulated through the normal planning/permit pathways: zoning clearance, site plan review, development plan review, administrative or conditional use permits, and variances/minor deviations where relevant. Key review authorities (director, planning commission, city council) and appeal routes are in the code. See § 17.74 (Zoning clearance), § 17.80 (Site plan review), § 17.96 (Development plan review), § 17.82 (Administrative use permits), and § 17.88 (Variances).
If you seek formal local protections (landmark/district), the code as retrieved does not provide them — you would need a code amendment, an ordinance, or separate historic‑preservation regulations adopted by council. Not found in retrieved materials: any local landmark/district designation procedure, design standards for historic preservation, Mills Act program language, or local historic inventory. Verify with the jurisdiction. Not found in retrieved materials.

District-by-district (how preservation issues map to Kerman’s zones)

Below are the zoning districts and the relevant places a preservation or historic‑property application will encounter the code (purpose, typical permitted uses, key dimensional standards, where it applies). This is not a preservation program — it is how the zoning framework treats development that may affect historic resources.

Notes:

For citywide permit pathways see the zoning overview at /us/california/kerman/zoning (first natural link to the city zoning page).
Where I mention setbacks or dimensional rules, those are enforced under the city’s development standards at /us/california/kerman/development-standards.

R‑1‑7 and R‑1‑12 (Single‑family residential)

Purpose: single‑unit residential neighborhoods; architectural standards for smaller‑lot single‑family dwellings. See § 17.10 and § 17.10.100.
Typical permitted uses: single‑unit dwellings, accessory structures, home occupations (table of uses in Division 2). See Division 2 use tables.
Key dimensional standards (examples pulled from Table 17.10 series): front yard 35 ft, side 5 ft, rear 15–25 ft depending on parcel; main structure height 35 ft. See Table/Chapter 17.10 and § 17.10.100 for architectural standards (R‑1‑7 and R‑1‑12). § 17.10.100, § 17.10.
Where preservation intersects: alterations to older single‑family buildings require the usual zoning clearance and may be subject to site plan review if they involve expansion beyond exempted activities. See § 17.80.

R‑2 and R‑3 (Multi‑unit residential)

Purpose: medium to higher density residential uses; multi‑unit design standards apply. See Chapter 17.46 and § 17.10.
Typical permitted uses: duplexes, small multi‑unit dwellings, supportive housing where allowed; accessory dwelling units per ADU regulations. See Division 2 and § 17.40.010 (ADUs).
Key dimensional standards: main structure height generally 35 ft (with some variation), side setbacks 5 ft, front setbacks in table; site plan review required for new construction or expansions in R‑2/R‑3. See § 17.10 and § 17.10.090.
Where preservation intersects: multi‑unit projects with historic fabric will be reviewed through site plan review and development plan review; design guidelines (if any) would be applied via those processes. See § 17.80 and § 17.96.

CG / CN / CS (Commercial zones)

Purpose: general commercial (CG), neighborhood commercial (CN), heavy commercial (CS). See Chapter 17.12.
Typical uses: retail, offices, eating/drinking establishments, some mixed uses; ADUs not applicable here except where mixed‑use (MU) rules apply. See Division 2 use tables.
Key standards: front setbacks can vary (some corridors require 10–20 ft front yards); floor area ratio and specific rear-yard rules are in § 17.12; sign standards in Chapter 17.30 apply to commercial zones — historic sign exceptions are in § 17.30.120(B)(2).
Where preservation intersects: historic commercial storefronts are altered under the usual site plan review / development plan review pathways and sign rules (special allowance for historic signs). See § 17.80, § 17.96, § 17.30.120.

MU (Mixed‑Use), PA (Professional/Administrative), M‑U and Industrial zones

Purpose & uses: mixed‑use corridors and employment areas with specific standards (see Chapters 17.12, 17.14, 17.16).
Key standards: varied setbacks; in the MU zone, where a lot abuts residential the code requires compatible setbacks; building heights up to 60 ft with CUP in some zones. See § 17.12 and associated tables.
Where preservation intersects: adaptive reuse in MU or industrial zones follows the same discretionary permit routes; if a site contains a building listed on a register, signage and interpretive elements may be negotiated through the permit conditions. See § 17.96 and § 17.80.

Combining zones / overlays

The code uses combining zones (PD, SD, IBA) to alter standards at project level — see Chapter 17.18 (Combining Zones). Preservation approaches (if adopted in future) would typically be implemented via an overlay or a combining zone or by amending Chapter 17.32. See § 17.18. Link: /us/california/kerman/overlay-districts.

Key decision‑relevant standards (quick table)

Topic	What the code says	Code reference
Local historic chapter status	Chapter 17.32 is (Reserved) — no active local preservation procedures present in retrieved materials.	§ 17.32
Definition of historic resource	“Significant building” defined (≥50 years old, listed on state/national registers, or council‑designated).	§ 17.120 (Definitions — “Significant building”)
Historic signage exception	Signs of historical significance may be treated specially (exception noted for areas on/eligible for National/California Register or registered local historic areas).	§ 17.30.120(B)(2)
Design and review pathways	Alterations are reviewed via zoning clearance, site plan review, development plan review, AUP/CUP, variances, etc.; director/commission/council roles defined.	§§ 17.74, 17.80, 17.96, 17.82, 17.88
Residential dimensional standards (examples)	R‑1 front setback 35 ft; side 5 ft; height 35 ft; accessory heights and encroachments noted in § 17.10 tables.	§ 17.10 and § 17.10.100; Table 17.10 series.

Checklist (what an applicant who owns an older/“historic” building in Kerman must satisfy)

Confirm whether the building is listed at state/federal level or flagged by the City (no local landmark list found in retrieved materials). Verify with city planning staff. Verify with the jurisdiction.
Determine permit path: zoning clearance, site plan review, or development plan review depending on scope — submit complete site plans and elevations. See § 17.80 and § 17.96.
If sign changes are proposed, prepare sign submittal and reference historical sign exception where applicable (see § 17.30.120). Link: /us/california/kerman/signage.
Show compliance with applicable development standards (setbacks, heights, lot coverage) and submit documentation for any requested deviations (variance or minor deviation). Link: /us/california/kerman/development-standards.
Prepare materials relevant to design review (elevations, materials, colors board); development plan review may require findings showing community benefit. Link: /us/california/kerman/design-review.
If the project increases density or changes use (e.g., conversion to multi‑unit), confirm ADU or multi‑unit rules (ADUs are addressed in § 17.40.010). Link: /us/california/kerman/adu.
Check sign, parking, landscaping, and nonconforming use rules as they could apply to older buildings. Links: /us/california/kerman/parking, /us/california/kerman/nonconforming-uses, /us/california/kerman/landscaping-and-screening.

Risks & Ambiguities

Issue	Why it matters	What to verify
No local landmark/district procedure in code	Without a local designation the City has no built‑in process to protect or incentivize historic resources.	Confirm with planning staff whether a separate historic‑preservation ordinance or inventory exists outside Title 17. Verify with the jurisdiction.
“Significant building” vs. local listing	The code’s definition identifies candidates but does not create protections or review rules.	Ask planning whether the council has identified any Significant buildings or maintains an inventory. Verify with the jurisdiction.
Signage rule scope	The sign code references historic/NR areas — but what areas are “eligible” or “registered” locally is not listed.	Confirm which areas (if any) are considered “historical zones” or eligible for register treatment. Verify with the jurisdiction.
Overlap of building code vs. zoning	Preservation work often needs both planning approvals and building permits; structural/safety requirements are in Title 24/state codes.	Planning will route you to building official for Title 24 compliance; refer to California Building Standards Code for structural rules. Link: /us/california/building-codes.
Parcel‑specific applicability	Whether a specific parcel qualifies for any historic treatment is not in Title 17.	Ask city for parcel history or records; consider contacting the county historical society or SHPO. Verify with the jurisdiction. Not found in retrieved materials.

Plain‑English summary

Kerman’s zoning code does not currently contain a functioning local historic‑preservation program — Chapter 17.32 is reserved — but it does define what a “significant building” is and gives a limited sign exception for historically significant signs. In practice, changes to older buildings are handled through the normal zoning and design‑review processes (zoning clearance, site plan review, development plan review, permits and variances). If you want legal local landmark status or preservation incentives, you will need to ask the City whether a separate ordinance or inventory exists or pursue a code amendment.

Source References

Chapter 17.32 — Chapter title and status (Reserved) — § 17.32.
Definitions including “Significant building” — § 17.120 (Definitions).
Sign regulations and historic‑sign exception — § 17.30.120(B)(2).
Residential district dimensional tables and § 17.10 family (R‑1‑7, R‑1‑12, R‑2, R‑3 standards) — § 17.10 and § 17.10.100.
Site Plan Review & application contents — § 17.80.
Development Plan Review Permit (combined zones & design findings) — § 17.96.
Permit types, variances, and administrative review authorities — § 17.70, § 17.82, § 17.88.
Combining zones (PD, SD, IBA) — Chapter 17.18.
California Building Standards Code / Title 24 (state code referenced for building work) — city code references state law; consult California Building Standards Code for construction compliance. Link for reference: /us/california/building-codes.

Information Gaps

No procedure or section in the retrieved Title 17 establishes a local landmark designation, local historic district map, or historic design review board. Not found in retrieved materials.
No local incentives (Mills Act, local grants, property‑tax incentives) or economic‑incentive language found in the provided zoning text. Not found in retrieved materials.
No local preservation design standards or rehabilitation guidelines are present in the retrieved code. Not found in retrieved materials.

Sources

Retrieved passages

Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.116) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Section 17.04.030) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.30) Medium relevance
CBC § 2 (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (title is) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (title or) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (chapter is) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.02) Medium relevance
CBC § 2 (Section 17.20.030) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.30) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance
CBC § 2 (§2) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.30) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.28) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (Chapter 17.46) Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code Medium relevance
Kerman Zoning Code (§2) Medium relevance

Cited sections

Chapter 17.32 — Chapter title and status **(Reserved)** — **§ 17.32**. (Chapter 17.32)
Definitions including **“Significant building”** — **§ 17.120** (Definitions). (§ 17.120)
Sign regulations and historic‑sign exception — **§ 17.30.120(B)(2)**. (§ 17.30.120)
Residential district dimensional tables and **§ 17.10** family (R‑1‑7, R‑1‑12, R‑2, R‑3 standards) — **§ 17.10** and **§ 17.10.100**. (§ 17.10)
Site Plan Review & application contents — **§ 17.80**. (§ 17.80)
Development Plan Review Permit (combined zones & design findings) — **§ 17.96**. (§ 17.96)
Permit types, variances, and administrative review authorities — **§ 17.70**, **§ 17.82**, **§ 17.88**. (§ 17.70)
Combining zones (PD, SD, IBA) — **Chapter 17.18**. (Chapter 17.18)
California Building Standards Code / Title 24 (state code referenced for building work) — city code references state law; consult California Building Standards Code for construction compliance. Link for reference: /us/california/building-codes. (Title 24)
Kerman_ZoningCode.md
2025 California Building Code.md

Frequently asked questions

What does Kerman’s zoning code require to alter an older house?

You follow the normal planning pathways: determine whether the work needs only a zoning clearance or triggers site plan review or development plan review (depending on scope). Prepare scaled plans, elevations, materials/colors, and any application materials required by § 17.80 and § 17.96 and consult the director for completeness. § 17.80, § 17.96.

Is there a Kerman process for designating local landmarks or a historic district?

Not in the retrieved Title 17. Chapter 17.32 (Historic Preservation) is listed as (Reserved), and no local landmark/district procedure appears in the retrieved materials. To pursue designation you would need to ask planning staff or seek an ordinance amendment. § 17.32 — (Reserved).

Does Kerman treat historic signs differently?

Yes — the sign chapter includes a specific allowance/exception for signs of historical significance located in areas listed or eligible for listing on the National Register, or registered as an historical landmark/point of interest, or within an historical zone; see § 17.30.120(B)(2) for the historic‑sign language. § 17.30.120.

How does the code define a historic or “significant” building?

A “significant building” is defined to include buildings at least 50 years old, buildings listed on the National or California Registers, or buildings the council determines are notably associated with local historic persons/events. See the definitions under § 17.120 (Definitions). § 17.120.

If I want to reuse an old storefront, what standards apply?

Adaptive reuse proposals are processed through the normal commercial-zone rules and discretionary review (site plan or development plan review), must meet development standards and sign rules (Chapter 17.30) — and historic signs may be eligible for special treatment per § 17.30.120. Expect to supply elevations, materials, parking calculations, and landscaping per site‑plan/development‑plan checklists. §§ 17.80, 17.96, 17.30.120.

Will an ADU on an older property be treated differently if the house is “significant”?

ADUs are governed by the ADU chapter (§ 17.40.010) and state ADU law; the zoning code does not show a separate historic exemption for ADUs in retrieved materials. If the project triggers site plan review for design or expansion, that review will apply. Verify historic‑resource treatment with planning staff. § 17.40.010.

Do I need design review for exterior work on an old building?

If the work is within the categories that require site plan review or development plan review (new construction, more than a threshold increase, or located in a combined zone), then design elements will be examined under those review processes; see § 17.80 and § 17.96. Minor repairs to single‑unit dwellings in R‑1 are often exempt per § 17.80.020(B)(1). §§ 17.80, 17.96.

Can the City require removal of an old sign because it is historic?

No — in fact, the sign chapter contains an allowance for historically significant signs; the city’s sign rules treat historic signage specially (see § 17.30.120(B)(2)). However, other sign‑safety or nonconforming rules still apply. § 17.30.120.

Where can I find the development standards that will be enforced during review?

Development standards (setbacks, heights, lot dimensions) are in Chapter 17.10 for residential zones and the corresponding zone chapters (e.g., Chapter 17.12 for commercial); see the development‑standards tables and § 17.10.100 for R‑1 architectural standards. Link: /us/california/kerman/development-standards. § 17.10. ---

Ask about any Kerman property

Get a cited, plain-English answer on Kerman zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.

Start Free Trial