CEBC · California Existing Building Code

What structural design loads and evaluation procedures govern existing building work?

If your alteration does not increase the design live load, you can evaluate gravity members using the previously approved live load (but must placard any area where that prior load is below CBC §1607). If the work increases live load, use the CBC §1607 live-load values. If the work changes potential snow-drift on an adjacent building, the code official may require compliance with ASCE 7 §7.12. See **§ 304**, **§ 304.1**, **§ 304.2**.

Last reviewed: July 6, 2026

What the code requires — 2–4 sentences

The California Existing Building Code requires that existing-structure work follow the structural-load rules in § 304 and the specific live-load and snow-drift provisions in § 304.1 and § 304.2. In plain English: if an addition or alteration does not increase the required design live load, existing gravity elements may be evaluated using the approved prior live load; if the work does increase the design live load, the live loads specified in Section 1607 of the California Building Code must be used (see § 304.1). If an alteration or addition changes potential snow-drift effects on an adjacent building, the code official may require compliance with Section 7.12 of ASCE 7 (see § 304.2) .

The single most important rule: If your work increases the design live load, use the current CBC live-load requirements (Section 1607); if it does not, you may use the previously approved live load — but you must post a placard where the older (nonconforming) live load is less than CBC requirements. See § 304.1.

Requirements in detail

1) Live loads (what to use and when)

  • Key points:
    • If an addition/alteration does not increase the design live load, existing gravity load–carrying elements may be evaluated and designed for the approved prior live load. § 304.1 is the controlling provision.
    • If the previously approved live load is less than the live load required by Section 1607 of the California Building Code, the area with the lower, nonconforming live load must be posted with approved placards showing the approved live load. § 304.1.
    • If the addition/alteration results in increased design live load, you must use the live load values in Section 1607 (CBC) for the affected elements. § 304.1.

2) Snow loads and drift effects on adjacent buildings

  • Key points:
    • Where an alteration or addition changes the potential snow drift effects on an adjacent building, the code official is authorized to enforce Section 7.12 of ASCE 7 to address snow drift/accumulation impacts. See § 304.2.

3) How § 304 fits with seismic and other evaluation procedures

  • § 304 is the header for the structural-load and evaluation procedures section of Chapter 3; it points to the live-load and snow-load rules above and sits with the CEBC’s seismic evaluation/design procedures found nearby (for example, see CEBC seismic provisions such as § 304.3 and the seismic criteria sections in Chapter 3). Use the live-load rules in § 304.1 and the snow-drift authority in § 304.2 together with the applicable evaluation method when structural evaluation is required. See § 304.

Decision table — when to use prior approved loads vs. new CBC values

Decision criterion Required action Code Reference
Addition/alteration does not increase design live load Existing gravity elements may be evaluated/designed using the approved prior live load § 304.1
Previously approved live load is less than CBC §1607 required live load The area with the nonconforming live load must be posted with placards showing the approved live load § 304.1
Addition/alteration increases design live load Use live loads required by Section 1607 of the California Building Code for design § 304.1
Alteration/addition changes potential snow-drift effects on an adjacent building Code official may require compliance with ASCE 7 Section 7.12 to address snow drift § 304.2

Exceptions & special cases

  • The CEBC text in § 304.1 already provides the special case where existing approved live loads may continue to be used when an alteration does not increase design live load; the only additional action required is posting a placard when the approved live load is lower than the CBC requirement. See § 304.1.
  • For snow drift effects, enforcement is discretionary in the sense that the code official is authorized to enforce ASCE 7 drift provisions when the alteration affects adjacent buildings; the CEBC does not give an automatic numeric trigger in § 304.2 — the code official applies Section 7.12 of ASCE 7 as needed. See § 304.2.
  • Note: Other CEBC sections (for example, CEBC seismic chapters and the seismic criteria selection rules) control when a full structural evaluation or retrofit is required; those sections may impose further load/evaluation obligations beyond the live-load and snow-drift rules cited here. See Related Provisions below.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming the previously-approved live load is always acceptable. If the renovation increases the required live load, you must use CBC §1607 values — you cannot rely on the old approval. See § 304.1.
  • Failing to post a placard when the area remains at a nonconforming live load that is less than CBC §1607; the code requires placarding in that situation. See § 304.1.
  • Ignoring snow-drift effects on neighboring buildings when adding or altering roof geometry; consult the code official and ASCE 7 Section 7.12 if drift may change. See § 304.2.
  • Treating § 304.1 as the only structural-evaluation rule. When structural evaluation or seismic retrofit is triggered, you must follow the CEBC seismic evaluation procedures (see CEBC seismic chapters) in addition to § 304.1/§ 304.2. See § 304.

Worked example — concrete scenario

Scenario (illustrative numbers only): an existing office floor was originally approved for a uniformly distributed floor live load of 40 psf. The owner proposes an alteration that leaves occupant layout similar and does not add heavier equipment, so the alteration does not increase the design live load for the gravity system.

  • Application of CEBC:
    • Because the alteration does not increase design live load, the structural engineer may evaluate the existing gravity members using the approved prior live load (40 psf) rather than recalculating to the CBC §1607 requirement, provided no other triggers (seismic, substantial alteration, etc.) apply — this follows § 304.1.
    • If the current CBC §1607 required live load for that occupancy were 50 psf (actual CBC values must be taken from CBC §1607), then the area where 40 psf is used would be a nonconforming live load area and must be posted with an approved placard stating the 40 psf allowable live load, per § 304.1.
    • If, instead, the owner added a heavy equipment area causing a new required floor live load >40 psf, the design would have to use the CBC §1607 live load values for that area (see § 304.1).

Note: the numeric values in this worked example are illustrative. The CEBC refers to Section 1607 of the California Building Code for the actual live-load magnitudes — consult CBC §1607 for occupancyspecific live-load values.

Related provisions

  • § 304.3 — Seismic evaluation and design procedures for existing buildings (scope and methodologies).
  • § 317 — Minimum seismic design performance levels, applicability and evaluation triggers for alterations/repairs.
  • § 319 — Seismic criteria selection for existing buildings (Method A, Method B, specific procedures).
  • § 320 / § 321 — Method A and Method B seismic evaluation/retrofit procedures (ASCE 41 referenced).
  • § 322 — Peer review requirements when Method B is used.
  • CBC Section 1607 — Governs required live-load values to be used when the CEBC requires use of the current CBC live loads (CBC text not reproduced here; see CBC).

Code references

Grounded in the retrieved California Existing Building Code — click a citation to read the verbatim passage:

  • CEBC § 7.12 High relevance — show source text

    SECTION 303 A RESERVED

    SECTION 304 A —STRUCTURAL DESIGN LOADS AND EVALUATION AND DESIGN PROCEDURES

    304 A .1 Live loads. Where an addition or alteration does not result in increased design live load, existing gravity load-carrying structural elements shall be permitted to be evaluated and designed for live loads approved prior to the addition or alteration. If the approved live load is less than that required by Section 1607 A of the California Building Code, the area designated for the nonconforming live load shall be posted with placards of approved design indicating the approved live load. Where the addition or alteration results in increased design live load, the live load required by Section 1607 A of the California Building Code shall be used.

    304 A .2 Snow loads on adjacent buildings. Where an alteration or addition changes the potential snow drift effects on an adjacent building, the code official is authorized to enforce Section 7.12 of ASCE 7.

    304 A .3 Additions, alterations, repairs and seismic retrofit to existing buildings or structures.

    304 A .3.1 Structures designed in accordance with pre-1973 building code. Provisions of this section shall apply to hospital build- ings which were originally designed to pre-1973 building codes and not designated as SPC 3 or higher in accordance with Chapter 6 of the California Administrative Code.

    304A.3.1.1 Incidental and minor structural alteration, additions, or repairs. Incidental and minor structural additions shall be permitted, provided the additions meet the California Building Code for new construction using importance factor, I e , equal to or greater than 1.0. Alterations or repair to existing gravity and lateral force-resisting systems shall be made to conform to the requirements of Section 503A or Chapter 4A, respectively, using importance factor, I e , equal to or greater than 1.0. 1. Nonstructural components. Component importance factor, I p , shall be permitted to be 1.0.

    Exception: Components required for life-safety purposes after an earthquake, including emergency and standby power systems, mechanical smoke removal systems, fire protection sprinkler systems, fire alarm control panels and egress stairways shall have a component importance factor (I p ) of 1.5.

    304A.3.1.2 Major structural alteration, additions or repairs. Major structural alterations, additions or repairs shall be in accor- dance with Section 304A.3.4.1 or 304A.3.4.3 as applicable.

    304A.3.2 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of general acute care hospitals for compliance with the California Administrative Code, Chapter 6. Notwithstanding any other requirements of this code, existing general acute care hospitals shall comply with the seismic evaluation requirements specified in Chapter 6, of the California Administrative Code, when applicable. Seismic retrofit to comply with requirements specified in Chapter 6 of the California Administrative Code shall be permitted to be in accordance with these provisions. When load combinations which do not include seismic forces are required, the new building provisions of this code shall be applicable.

  • CEBC § 906.2 High relevance — show source text

    [BS] 906.2 Existing structural elements resisting lateral loads. Where work involves a substantial structural alteration,the lateral load-resisting system of the altered building shall be shown to satisfy the requirements of Section 1609 of the California Building Code and Section 304.3.2 of this code. Where the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category D or F, supports and attachments for nonstructural components required to serve any portion of the building with a use included in Risk Category IV shall comply with Section 1613 of the California Building Code or shall comply with ASCE 41 using an objective of Position Retention nonstructural performance with the BSE-1E earthquake hazard level.

    Exceptions:

    1. Buildings of Group R occupancy with not more than five dwelling or sleeping units used solely for residential purposes that are altered based on the conventional light-frame construction methods of the California Building Code or in compliance with the provisions of the California Residential Code .
    2. Where the intended alteration involves only the lowest story of a building, structural components of the lateral load resisting system above that story need not comply with this section.

    [BS] 906.3 Seismic Design Category F. Where the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category F, the lateral force-resisting system of the altered building shall meet the requirements of Section 1609 of the California Building Code and Section 304.3.2 of this code. Supports and attachments for nonstructural components serving any portion of the building with a use included in Risk Cate- gory IV shall comply with Section 1613 of the California Building Code or shall comply with ASCE 41 using an objective of Position Retention nonstructural performance with the BSE-1E earthquake hazard level.

    [BS] 906.4 Anchorage for concrete and masonry buildings. For any building assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E or F with a structural system that includes concrete or reinforced masonry walls with a flexible roof diaphragm, the alteration shall comply with Section 304.3.2 by evaluation of the existing condition or by installation of wall anchors at the roof line of all subject buildings and at the floor lines of unreinforced masonry.

    [BS] 906.5 Anchorage for unreinforced masonry walls. For any building assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F with a structural system that includes unreinforced masonry bearing walls, the alteration shall comply with Section 304.3.2 by evaluation of the existing condition or by installation of wall anchors at the roof line.

    [BS] 906.6 Bracing for unreinforced masonry parapets. Parapets constructed of unreinforced masonry in buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F shall comply with Section 304.3.2 by evaluation of the existing condition or by installation of parapet bracing.

    [BS] 906.7 Anchorage of unreinforced masonry partitions. Where the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F, unreinforced masonry partitions and nonstructural walls within the work area and adjacent to egress paths from the work area shall have their existing conditions evaluated or shall be anchored, removed or altered to resist out-of-plane seismic forces to comply with Section 304.3.2.

    SECTION 907—ENERGY CONSERVATION

    907.1 Minimum requirements. Level 3 alterations to existing buildings or structures shall comply with applicable provisions of the California Energy Code (Part 6, Title 24, C.C.R).

  • CEBC § 503.7 High relevance — show source text

    [BS] 503.7 Anchorage for concrete and reinforced masonry walls. Where the work area exceeds 50 percent of the building area, the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F and the building’s structural system includes concrete or reinforced masonry walls with a flexible roof diaphragm, the alteration shall comply with Section 304.3.2 by evaluation of the existing condition or by installation of wall anchors at the roof line.

    [BS] 503.8 Anchorage for unreinforced masonry walls in major alterations. Where the work area exceeds 50 percent of the building area, the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F and the building’s structural system includes unreinforced masonry bearing walls, the alteration shall comply with Section 304.3.2 by evaluation of the existing condition or by installation of wall anchors at the floor and roof lines.

    [BS] 503.9 Bracing for unreinforced masonry parapets in major alterations. Where the work area exceeds 50 percent of the building area, and where the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F, and the building has parapets constructed of unreinforced masonry, the alteration shall comply with Section 304.3.2 by evaluation of the existing condition or by installation of parapet bracing to resist out-of-plane seismic forces.

    [BS] 503.10 Anchorage of unreinforced masonry partitions in major alterations. Where the work area exceeds 50 percent of the building area, or where the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F, and the building has unreinforced masonry partitions and nonstructural walls, the alteration work shall include evaluation of the existing condition or removal, anchoring or alteration of any such partitions or walls within the work area and adjacent to egress paths from the work area, to comply with Section 304.3.2.

    [BS] 503.11 Substantial structural alteration. Where the work area exceeds 50 percent of the building area and where work involves a substantial structural alteration, the lateral load-resisting system of the altered building shall satisfy the requirements of Section 1609 of the California Building Code and Section 304.3.2 of this code. Where the building is assigned to Seismic Design Category D or F, supports and attachments for nonstructural components required to serve any portion of the building with a use included in Risk Category IV shall comply with Section 1613 of the California Building Code or shall comply with ASCE 41 using an objective of Position Retention nonstructural performance with the BSE-1E earthquake hazard level.

    Exceptions:

    1. Buildings of Group R occupancy with not more than five dwelling or sleeping units used solely for residential purposes that are altered based on the conventional light-frame construction methods of the California Building Code or in compliance with the provisions of the California Residential Code .
    2. Where the intended alteration involves structural components of the lowest story of a building, only the lateral loadresisting system above that story need not comply with this section.

    [BS] 503.12 Roof diaphragms resisting wind loads in high-wind regions. Where the intended alteration requires a permit for reroofing and involves removal of roofing materials from more than 50 percent of the roof diaphragm of a building or section of a building located where the basic wind speed, V, is greater than 130 mph (58 m/s) in accordance with Figure 1609.3(2) of the California

  • CEBC § 303.3 High relevance — show source text

    Exceptions:

    1. Where an addition is being added on an existing Group E site, and where the addition is not of sufficient size to accommodate the required occupant capacity of the storm shelter for all of the buildings on-site, the storm shelter shall at a minimum accommodate the required capacity for the addition.
    2. Where approved by the code official, the required design occupant capacity of the shelter shall be permitted to be reduced by the design occupant capacity of any existing storm shelters on the site.

    303.3 Occupancy classification. The occupancy classification for storm shelters shall be determined in accordance with Section 423.3 of the California Building Code .

    SECTION 304—STRUCTURAL DESIGN LOADS AND EVALUATION AND DESIGN PROCEDURES

    [BS] 304.1 Live loads. Where an addition or alteration does not result in increased design live load, existing gravity load-carrying structural elements shall be permitted to be evaluated and designed for live loads approved prior to the addition or alteration. If the approved live load is less than that required by Section 1607 of the California Building Code, the area designated for the nonconforming live load shall be posted with placards of approved design indicating the approved live load. Where the addition or alteration results in increased design live load, the live load required by Section 1607 of the California Building Code shall be used.

    [BS] 304.2 Snow loads on adjacent buildings. Where an alteration or addition changes the potential snow drift effects on an adjacent building, the code official is authorized to enforce Section 7.12 of ASCE 7.

    [BS] 304.3 Seismic evaluation and design procedures. Where required, seismic evaluation or design shall comply with the procedures and criteria in this section, regardless of which compliance method is used. The scope of the required evaluation or design shall be as indicated in applicable provisions of Chapters 4 through 11 .

    [BS] 304.3.1 Full seismic criteria. Where required, seismic evaluation or design shall comply with one of the following methodologies, which shall not be applied in combination with each other:

    1. Section 1613 of the California Building Code . Where the existing seismic force-resisting system is a type that can be designated as “Ordinary,” values of R, Ω 0 and C d used for analysis in accordance with Chapter 16 of the California Building Code shall be those specified for structural systems classified as “Ordinary” in accordance with Table 12.2-1 of ASCE 7, unless it can be demonstrated that the structural system will provide performance equivalent to that of a “Detailed,” “Intermediate” or “Special” system.
    2. ASCE 41, using a Tier 3 procedure and both levels of the two-level performance objective in Table 304.3.1 for the applicable risk category.
  • CEBC § 319.8. High relevance — show source text

    unless it can be demonstrated that_ reduced capacity meets the requirements of Section 319.8. 2. The lateral loading to or strength requirement of existing structural components is not increased beyond their capacity. 3. New structural components are detailed and connected to the existing structural components as required by the California Building Code. 4. New or relocated nonstructural components are detailed and connected to existing or new structural components as required by the California Building Code. 5. A dangerous condition is not created.

    Use of ASCE 41 Tier 1 and Tier 2 deficiency only retrofit procedures are pre-approved for use where Section 317.3 does not require an

    assessment.

    319.12.1 State-owned buildings. [BSC] Voluntary modifications to lateral force-resisting systems conducted in accordance with Appendix A of this code and the referenced standards of the California Building Code shall be permitted.

    319.12.1.1 Design documents. [BSC] When Section 319.12 is the basis for structural modifications, the approved design documents must clearly state the scope of the seismic modifications and the accepted criteria for the design. The approved design documents must clearly have the phrase “The seismic requirements of the California Existing Building Code have not been checked to determine if these structural modifications meet the full seismic evaluation and strengthening requirements of Sections 317-322: the modifications proposed are to a different seismic performance standard than would be required in Section 319 if they were not voluntary as allowed in Section 319.12.”

    3-20 2025 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE

    on Jul 18, 2025 11:14 AM (CDT) THEREUNDER.

    PROVISIONS FOR ALL COMPLIANCE METHODS

    319.12.2 Public schools and community colleges. [DSA-SS, DSA-SS/CC] When Section 319.12 is the basis for structural modifications, the approved design documents must clearly indicate the scope of modifications and the acceptance criteria for the design.

    SECTION 320 [BSC, DSA-SS & DSA-SS/CC]—METHOD A

    320.1 General. The retrofit design shall employ the Linear Static or Linear Dynamic Procedures of ASCE 41, Section 7.4.1 or 7.4.2, and comply with the applicable general requirements of ASCE 41, Chapters 6 and 7. The earthquake hazard level and performance level given specified in Section 317.5 for the building’s risk category shall be used. Structures shall be designed for seismic forces coming from any horizontal direction.

    SECTION 321 [BSC, DSA-SS & DSA-SS/CC]—METHOD B

    321.1 The existing or retrofitted structure shall be demonstrated to have the capability to sustain the deformation response due to the specified earthquake ground motions and meet the seismic performance requirements of Section 317. The registered design professional shall provide an evaluation of the response of the existing structure in its modified configuration and condition to the ground motions specified. If the building’s seismic performance is evaluated as satisfactory and the peer reviewer(s) and the enforcement agency concurs, then no further structural retrofit and/or repair of the lateral load-resisting system is required.

  • CEBC § 317.3.2 High relevance — show source text

    2. There are changes in risk category. 3. The modification to the structural components increases the seismic forces in or strength requirements of any structural component of the existing structure by more than 10 percent cumulative since the original construction, unless the component has the capacity to resist the increased forces determined in accordance with Section 319. If the building’s seismic base shear capacity has been increased since the original construction, the percent change in base shear may be calculated relative to the increased value.

    4. Structural elements need repair where the damage has reduced the lateral-load-resisting capacity of the structural system by more than 10 percent. 5. Changes in live or dead load increase story shear by more than 10 percent.

    317.3.2 Public school buildings. [DSA-SS] For public schools, the provisions of Section 317 apply when required in accordance with Sections 4-307 and 4-309(c) of the California Administrative Code.

    317.3.3 Community college buildings. [DSA-SS/CC] For community colleges, the provisions of Section 317 apply when required in accordance with Sections 4-307 and 4-309(c) of the California Administrative Code.

    317.4 Evaluation required. If the criteria in Section 317.3 apply to the project under consideration, the design professional of record shall provide an evaluation in accordance with Section 317 to determine the seismic performance of the building in its current configuration and condition. If the structure's seismic performance as required by Section 317.5 is evaluated as satisfactory and the peer reviewer(s), when Method B of Section 321 is used, concur, then no structural retrofit is required.

    317.5 Minimum seismic design performance levels for structural and nonstructural components. Following the notations of ASCE 41, the seismic requirements for design and assessment are based upon a prescribed Seismic Hazard Level (BSE-1N, BSE-2N, BSE-1E, BSE-R or BSE-C), a specified structural performance level (S-1 through S-5) and a nonstructural performance level (N-A through N-E). The minimum seismic performance criteria are given in Table 317.5 according to the Building Regulatory Authority and the Risk Category as determined in Chapter 16 of the California Building Code or by the regulatory authority. The building shall be evaluated in accordance with a Tier 3 Systematic Evaluation and Retrofit per ASCE 41 Chapter 6 for both the Level 1 and Level 2 performance levels, and the more restrictive requirements shall apply.

    Exception: If the floor area of an addition is greater than the larger of 50 percent of the floor area of the original building or 1,000 square feet (93 m [2] ), then the Table 317.5 entries for BSE-R (or BSE-1E) and BSE-C are replaced by BSE-1N and BSE-2N, respectively.

    |TABLE 317.5—SEISMIC PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS2,

  • CEBC § 3-20 High relevance — show source text

    3-20 2025 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE

    on Jul 18, 2025 11:14 AM (CDT) THEREUNDER.

    PROVISIONS FOR ALL COMPLIANCE METHODS

    319.12.2 Public schools and community colleges. [DSA-SS, DSA-SS/CC] When Section 319.12 is the basis for structural modifications, the approved design documents must clearly indicate the scope of modifications and the acceptance criteria for the design.

    SECTION 320 [BSC, DSA-SS & DSA-SS/CC]—METHOD A

    320.1 General. The retrofit design shall employ the Linear Static or Linear Dynamic Procedures of ASCE 41, Section 7.4.1 or 7.4.2, and comply with the applicable general requirements of ASCE 41, Chapters 6 and 7. The earthquake hazard level and performance level given specified in Section 317.5 for the building’s risk category shall be used. Structures shall be designed for seismic forces coming from any horizontal direction.

    SECTION 321 [BSC, DSA-SS & DSA-SS/CC]—METHOD B

    321.1 The existing or retrofitted structure shall be demonstrated to have the capability to sustain the deformation response due to the specified earthquake ground motions and meet the seismic performance requirements of Section 317. The registered design professional shall provide an evaluation of the response of the existing structure in its modified configuration and condition to the ground motions specified. If the building’s seismic performance is evaluated as satisfactory and the peer reviewer(s) and the enforcement agency concurs, then no further structural retrofit and/or repair of the lateral load-resisting system is required.

    When the evaluation indicates the building does not meet the required performance levels given in Table 317.5 for the risk category, then a retrofit and/or repair design shall be prepared that provides a structure that meets these performance objectives and reflects the appropriate consideration of existing conditions. Any approach to analysis and design is permitted to be used, provided that the approach shall be rational, shall be consistent with the established principals of mechanics and shall use the known performance characteristics of materials and assemblages under reversing loads typical of severe earthquake ground motions.

    Exception: Further consideration of the structure’s seismic performance may be waived by the enforcement agency if both the registered design professional and peer reviewer(s) conclude that the structural system can be expected to perform at least as well as required by the provisions of this section without completing an analysis of the structure’s compliance with these requirements. A detailed report shall be submitted to the responsible building official that presents the reasons and basis for this conclusion. This report shall be prepared by the registered design professional. The peer reviewer(s) shall concur in this conclusion and affirm to it in writing. The building official shall either approve this decision or require completion of the indicated work specified in this section prior to approval.

    321.2 The approach, models, analysis procedures, assumptions on material and system behavior and conclusions shall be peer reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Section 322 and accepted by the peer reviewer(s).

    Exceptions: 1. The enforcement agency may perform the work of peer review when qualified staff is available within the jurisdiction. 2. The enforcement agency may modify or waive the requirements for peer review when appropriate.

  • CEBC § 319.3 High relevance — show source text

    Where original building plans and specifications are not available, “as-built” plans shall be prepared that depict the existing vertical and lateral structural systems, exterior elements, foundations and nonstructural systems in sufficient detail to complete the design.

    Data collection shall be directed and observed by the project structural engineer or design professional in charge of the design.

    319.3 Site geology and soil characteristics. Soil profile shall be assigned in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18 of the California Building Code.

    319.4 Risk categories. Each structure shall be placed in one of the Risk Categories in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code.

    319.5 Configuration requirements. Each structure shall be designated structurally regular or irregular. If the evaluation and retrofit is in accordance with Table 317.5, Footnote 2 or 3, the building shall be classified by application of ASCE 7, Section 12.3.2. If the evaluation and retrofit is in accordance with ASCE 41, the building shall be classified as irregular when an irregularity defined in ASCE 41, Sections 7.3.1.1.1 through 7.3.1.1.4 exists.

    319.6 General selection of the design method. The requirements of Method B (Section 321) may be used for any existing building.

    319.7 Prescriptive selection of the design method. The requirements of Method A per Section 320 or the specific procedures for applicable building types given in Section 319.1.1 are permitted to be used except if the building has one or more characteristics described in Sections 319.7.1 through 319.7.7, in which case Method B shall be used.

    319.7.1 A building with prestressed or post- tensioned structural components (beams, columns, walls or slabs) or precast structural components (beams, columns, walls or flooring systems).

    319.7.2 A building classified as irregular per Section 319.5.

    Exceptions: 1. The retrofit design removes the configurational attributes that caused the building to be classified as irregular. 2. The irregularity is demonstrated not to affect the seismic performance of the building.

    319.7.3 A building assigned to Risk Category IV per Section 319.4.

    319.7.4 A building with an undefined or hybrid structural system.

    2025 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE 3-19

    on Jul 18, 2025 11:14 AM (CDT) THEREUNDER.

    PROVISIONS FOR ALL COMPLIANCE METHODS

    319.7.5 A building with a seismic isolation or energy dissipation system, either as part of the existing structure or as part of the retrofit.

    319.7.6 A building greater than 240 feet (73 m) in height.

    319.7.7 A building evaluated per ASCE 41 and its application requires the use of a nonlinear analysis procedure.

  • CEBC § 0.7 High relevance — show source text

    For steel structural members, the deflection due to creep component of long-term dead load shall be permitted to be taken as zero.
    h. For aluminum structural members or aluminum panels used in skylights and sloped glazing framing, roofs or walls of sunroom additions or patio covers not supporting edge
    of glass or aluminum sandwich panels, the total load deflection shall not exceed_l_/60. For continuous aluminum structural members supporting edge of glass, the total load
    deflection shall not exceed_l_/175 for each glass lite or_l_/60 for the entire length of the member, whichever is more stringent. For aluminum sandwich panels used in roofs or
    walls of sunroom additions or patio covers, the total load deflection shall not exceed_l_/120.
    i._ l_ = Length of the member between supports. For cantilever members,l shall be taken as twice the length of the cantilever.
    j. The snow load shall be permitted to be taken as 0.7 times the design snow load determined in accordance with Section 1608_A_.1 for the purpose of determining deflection
    limits in Table 1604_A_.3.|For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm.
    a. For structural roofing and siding made of formed metal sheets, the total load deflection shall not exceed_l_/60. For secondary roof structural members supporting formed
    metal roofing, the live load deflection shall not exceed_l_/150. For secondary wall members supporting formed metal siding, the design wind load deflection shall not exceed
    l/90. For roofs, this exception only applies when the metal sheets have no roof covering.
    b. Flexible, folding and portable partitions are not governed by the provisions of this section. The deflection criterion for interior partitions is based on the horizontal load
    defined in Section 1607_A_.16.
    c. See Section 2403 for glass supports.
    d. The deflection limit for the_D_ + (L or_Lr_) load combination only applies to the deflection due to the creep component of long-term dead load deflection plus the short-term live load
    deflection. For lumber, structural glued laminated timber, prefabricated wood I-joists and structural composite lumber members that are dry at time of installation and used under
    dry conditions in accordance with the ANSI/AWC NDS, the creep component of the long-term deflection shall be permitted to be estimated as the immediate dead load deflection
    resulting from 0.5_D_. For lumber and glued laminated timber members installed or used at all other moisture conditions or cross laminated timber and wood structural panels that
    are dry at time of installation and used under dry conditions in accordance with the ANSI/AWC NDS, the creep component of the long-term deflection is permitted to be estimated
    as the immediate dead load deflection resulting from_D_. The value of 0.5_D_ shall not be used in combination with ANSI/AWC NDS provisions for long-term loading.
    e. The preceding deflections do not ensure against ponding. Roofs that do not have sufficient slope or camber to ensure adequate drainage shall be investigated for ponding.
    See Chapter 8 of ASCE 7.
    f. The wind load shall be permitted to be taken as 0.42 times the “component and cladding” loads or directly calculated using the 10-year mean return interval basic wind
    speed,V, for the purpose of determining deflection limits in Table 1604_A_.3. Where framing members support glass, the deflection limit therein shall not exceed that specified
    in Section 1604_A_.3.7
    g.

  • CEBC § 3.3. High relevance — show source text

    BSE-C RESPONSE ACCELERATION PARAMETERS [BSC] are the parameters (S XS and S X1 ) taken from 5-percent/50-year maximum direction spectral response acceleration curves or by a Site Specific Response Spectrum developed in accordance with ASCE 41, Section 2.3.3.

    BSE-R RESPONSE ACCELERATION PARAMETERS [BSC] are the parameters (S XS and S X1 ) taken from 20-percent /50-year maximum direction spectral response acceleration curves or by a Site Specific Response Spectrum developed in accordance with ASCE 41, Section 2.3.3.

    SECTION 319 [BSC, DSA-SS & DSA-SS/CC]—SEISMIC CRITERIA SELECTION FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS

    319.1 Basis for evaluation and design. This section determines what technical approach is to be used for the seismic evaluation and design for existing buildings. For those buildings or portions of buildings for which Section 317 requires action, the procedures and limitations for the evaluation of existing buildings and design of retrofit systems and/or repair thereof shall be implemented in accordance with this section.

    One of the following approaches must be used: 1. Method A of Section 320;

    2. Method B of Section 321, with independent review of a peer reviewer as required in Section 322; or 3. For state-owned buildings only, the use of one of the specific procedures listed in Section 319.1.1.

    When Method B is chosen it must be approved by the building official, and, where applicable, by the peer reviewer. All referenced standards in ASCE 41 shall be replaced by referenced standards listed in Chapter 35 of the California Building Code.

    Exceptions: 1. [BSC] For buildings constructed to the requirements of California Building Code, 2019 or later edition, as adopted by the governing jurisdiction, that code is permitted to be used in place of those specified in Section 319.1. 2. [DSA-SS & DSA-SS/CC] For the conversion of nonconforming buildings to conforming school buildings in accordance with Section 4-307 of the California Administrative Code, nonconforming buildings constructed to the requirements of California Building Code, 2019 or later edition, that code as it was adopted by the governing jurisdiction is permitted to be used in place of those specified in Section 319.1 provided the building complies with Seismic Design Category D or higher.

    319.1.1 Specific procedures. [BSC] For state-owned buildings, the following specific procedures located in Appendix A may be used, without peer review, for their respective types of construction to comply with the seismic performance requirements for Risk Category I, II or III buildings: 1. Seismic Strengthening Provisions for Unreinforced Masonry Bearing Wall Buildings (Chapter A1). 2. Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Reinforced Concrete and Reinforced Masonry Wall Buildings with Flexible Diaphragms (Chapter A2).

    319.1.2 When a design project is begun under Method B the selection of the peer reviewer is subject to the approval of the building official. Following approval by the peer reviewer, the seismic criteria for the project and the planned evaluation provisions must be approved by the building official. The approved seismic criteria and evaluation provisions shall apply. Upon approval of the building official these are permitted to be modified.

  • CEBC § 3.1 High relevance — show source text

    Exception: Construction documents for buildings constructed in accordance with the conventional light-frame construction provisions of Section 2308 shall indicate the following structural design information:

    1. Floor and roof dead and live loads.

    2. Ground snow load, p g, and allowable stress design ground snow load, p g(asd) .

    3. Basic wind speed, V, mph (m/s), and allowable stress design wind speed, V asd , as determined in accordance with Section 1609 A .3.1 and wind exposure.

    4. Seismic design category and site class.

    5. Flood design data, if located in flood hazard areas established in Section 1612 A .3.

    6. Design load-bearing values of soils.

    7. Rain load data.

    [DSA-SS] Additional requirements are included in Section 4-210 and 4-317 of the California Administrative Code (Part 1, Title 24, C.C.R).

    [OSHPD 1] Additional requirements are included in Section 7-115 and 7-125 of the California Administrative Code.

    1603 A .1.1 Floor live load. The uniformly distributed, concentrated and impact floor live load used in the design shall be indicated for floor areas. Use of live load reduction in accordance with Section 1607 A .13 shall be indicated for each type of live load used in the design.

    1603 A .1.2 Roof live load. The roof live load used in the design shall be indicated for roof areas. 1603 A .1.3 Roof snow load data. The ground snow load, p g, shall be indicated. In areas where the ground snow load, p g , exceeds 15 pounds per square foot (psf) (0.72 kN/m [2] ), the following additional information shall also be provided, regardless of whether snow loads govern the design of the roof:

    1. Flat-roof snow load, p f .
    2. Snow exposure factor, C e .
    3. Risk category.
    4. Thermal factor, C t .
    5. Slope factor(s), C s .
    6. Drift surcharge load(s), p d , where the sum of p d and p f exceeds 30 psf (1.44 kN/m [2] ) .
    7. Width of snow drift(s), w .
    8. Winter wind parameter for snow drift, W 2 .

    1603 A .1.4 Wind and tornado design data. The following information related to wind loads and, where required by Section 1609 A .5, tornado loads shall be shown, regardless of whether wind or tornado loads govern the design of the lateral force-resisting system of the structure:

    1. Basic wind speed, V, mph (m/s), tornado speed, V T, mph (m/s), and allowable stress design wind speed, V asd, mph (m/s), as determined in accordance with Section 1609 A .3.1.
  • CEBC § 302A.6 High relevance — show source text

    Exception: Where alternative design criteria are specifically permitted.

    302 A .5 Occupancy and use. Where determining the appropriate application of the referenced sections of this code, the occupancy and use of a building shall be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the California Building Code .

    302A.6 Maintenance. Buildings and structures, and parts thereof, shall be maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. Devices or safe- guards which are required by this code shall be maintained in conformance with the code edition under which they were installed. The owner or the owner’s designated agent shall be responsible for the maintenance of buildings and structures. To determine compliance with this subsection, the building official shall have the authority to require a building or structure to be re-inspected. The requirements of this chapter shall not provide the basis for removal or abrogation of fire protection and safety systems and devices in existing structures.

    302A.7 Construction documents for retrofit or rehabilitation. The design loads and other information pertinent to the structural design required by California Building Code Section 1603A shall be included in the drawings. In addition to the information required by California Building Code Section 1603A.1.5, the drawings shall show the ground motion hazard used for the retrofit or rehabilitation as either a percentage of the California Building Code prescribed ground motion for new hospital buildings, or ASCE 41 seismic hazard designation, or a probability of exceedance in a specified time period, or a return period for exceedance of the specified ground motion.

    SECTION 303 A RESERVED

    SECTION 304 A —STRUCTURAL DESIGN LOADS AND EVALUATION AND DESIGN PROCEDURES

    304 A .1 Live loads. Where an addition or alteration does not result in increased design live load, existing gravity load-carrying structural elements shall be permitted to be evaluated and designed for live loads approved prior to the addition or alteration. If the approved live load is less than that required by Section 1607 A of the California Building Code, the area designated for the nonconforming live load shall be posted with placards of approved design indicating the approved live load. Where the addition or alteration results in increased design live load, the live load required by Section 1607 A of the California Building Code shall be used.

    304 A .2 Snow loads on adjacent buildings. Where an alteration or addition changes the potential snow drift effects on an adjacent building, the code official is authorized to enforce Section 7.12 of ASCE 7.

    304 A .3 Additions, alterations, repairs and seismic retrofit to existing buildings or structures.

    304 A .3.1 Structures designed in accordance with pre-1973 building code. Provisions of this section shall apply to hospital build- ings which were originally designed to pre-1973 building codes and not designated as SPC 3 or higher in accordance with Chapter 6 of the California Administrative Code.

Frequently asked questions

When can I keep the old live load for an existing floor?

You may keep the approved prior live load for existing gravity elements only when an addition or alteration does not increase the design live load. If it does increase, the live loads in CBC §1607 must be used. See § 304.1.

Do I have to notify occupants when an area is allowed a lower live load than the CBC requires?

Yes — when the approved live load is less than CBC §1607, the area must be posted with placards of approved design showing the approved (nonconforming) live load. See § 304.1.

What if my roof addition changes snow drift onto my neighbor’s building?

If the alteration or addition changes potential snow drift effects on an adjacent building, the code official may enforce Section 7.12 of ASCE 7 to address drift; coordinate with the code official and your engineer. See § 304.2.

Does § 304 override seismic retrofit requirements?

No. § 304 sets the structural-load and evaluation context (including live load and snow-drift rules). When seismic evaluation or retrofit is required, follow the CEBC seismic chapters and methods (for example, §§ 317–321) in addition to § 304 provisions.

Who enforces compliance with ASCE 7 snow-drift provisions?

The code official is authorized to enforce ASCE 7 Section 7.12 when an alteration or addition changes potential snow-drift effects on adjacent structures, per § 304.2.

More in California Existing Building Code

Ask about the CEBC

Get cited, plain-English answers on the California Existing Building Code for your project — any code section, any scenario.

Start Free Trial

Related in the CEBC