ARTICLE 29
U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Denmark Technical Explanation - 2000 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
Entry into Force
This Article contains the rules for bringing the Convention into force and giving effect to its provisions.
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1 provides that each State shall notify the other as soon as its requirements for
entry into force have been complied with.
In the United States, the process leading to ratification and entry into force is as follows: Once a treaty has been signed by authorized representatives of the two Contracting States, the Department of State sends the treaty to the President who formally transmits it to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification, which requires approval by two-thirds of the Senators present and voting. Prior to this vote, however, it generally has been the practice for the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations to hold hearings on the treaty and make a recommendation regarding its approval to the full Senate. Both Government and private sector witnesses may testify at these hearings. After receiving the Senate’s advice and consent to ratification, the treaty is returned to the President for his signature on the ratification document. The President's signature on the document completes the process in the United States.
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2 provides that the Convention will enter into force on the date on which the second of the two notifications of the completion of requirements for the entry into force of the Convention has been received. The date on which a treaty enters into force is not necessarily the date on which its provisions take effect. Paragraph 2, therefore, also contains rules that determine when the provisions of the treaty will have effect. Under paragraph 2(a), the Convention will have effect with respect to taxes withheld at source (principally dividends, interest and royalties) for amounts paid or credited on or after the first day of the second month following the date on which the Convention enters into force. For example, if the second notification is received on April 25 of a given year, the withholding rates specified in paragraph 2 of Article 10 (Dividends) would be applicable to any dividends paid or credited on or after June 1 of that year. This rule allows the benefits of the withholding reductions to be put into effect without waiting until the following year. The delay of one to two months is required to allow sufficient time for withholding agents to be informed about the change in withholding rates. If for some reason a withholding agent withholds at a higher rate than that provided by the Convention (perhaps because it was not able to re-program its computers before the payment is made), a beneficial owner of the income that is a resident of the other Contracting State may make a claim for refund pursuant to section 1464 of the Code.
For all other taxes, paragraph 2(b) specifies that the Convention will have effect for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1 of the year following entry into force.
As discussed under Articles 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure), 26 (Exchange of Information) and 27 (Administrative Assistance), the powers afforded the competent authority under these articles apply retroactively to taxable periods preceding entry into force.
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3 provides that the prior Convention will cease to have effect at the time this Convention takes effect under the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 4 of this Article. The prior Convention shall terminate on the last date on which it has effect in accordance with the
foregoing provisions of this Article.
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4 provides a general exception to the effective date rules of paragraph 2. Under this paragraph, if the prior Convention would have afforded any greater relief from tax than this Convention, the prior Convention shall, at the election of any person that was entitled to benefits under the prior Convention, continue to have effect in its entirety for one year after the date on which the provisions of this Convention would otherwise first have had effect under the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article.
Thus, a taxpayer may elect to extend the benefits of the prior Convention for one year from the date on which the relevant provision of the new Convention would first take effect. For example, suppose the instruments of ratification are exchanged on February 1, 2000 and the Convention thus enters into force on that date. The new Convention would take effect with respect to taxes withheld at source for amounts paid or credited on or after April 1, 2000. If the election is made, the provisions of the prior Convention regarding withholding would continue to have effect for amounts paid or credited at any time prior to April 1, 2001. With regard to assessed taxes, the new Convention would be applicable for fiscal periods beginning on or after January 1, 2001. Therefore, with respect to the branch tax, which is imposed on an assessment basis, an election would allow the prior Convention to continue, thus preventing the imposition of the branch tax until the first taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2002.
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5 provides that the prior Convention terminates on the last date on which it has effect in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Article.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code