Skip to content

ARTICLE 27

U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Denmark Technical Explanation - 2000 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

Administrative Assistance

Paragraph 1

This Article obligates the Contracting States to undertake to lend assistance to each other in the collection of taxes referred to in Article 2 (Taxes Covered), together with interest, costs, additions to such taxes, and civil penalties, which are referred to in the Article as a “revenue claim.” This provision is similar in scope to Article XVIII (Administrative Assistance) of the income tax treaty between the United States and Denmark signed on May 6, 1948. The differences between that treaty and the text of this Convention reflect changes incorporated into the administrative assistance provisions of newer U.S. tax treaties, such as with the Netherlands and with Canada.

Paragraph 2

Paragraph 2 requires a Contracting State applying for collection assistance (the “applicant State”) to certify that the revenue claim for which collection assistance is sought has been “finally determined.” Under paragraph 2 a revenue claim has been finally determined when the applicant State has the right under its internal law to collect the revenue claim and all administrative and judicial rights of the taxpayer to restrain collection in the applicant State have lapsed or been

exhausted.

Paragraph 3

Paragraph 3 of the Article clarifies that the Contracting State from which assistance was requested (the “requested State”) has discretion as to whether to accept a particular application for collection assistance. However, if the application for assistance is accepted, paragraph 3 requires that the requested State grant assistance under its existing procedures as though the claim were the requested State’s own revenue claim finally determined under the laws of that State. This obligation under paragraph 3 is limited by paragraph 7 of the Article, which provides that, although generally treated as a revenue claim of the requested State, a claim for which collection assistance is granted shall not have any priority accorded to the revenue claim of the requested State.

Paragraph 4

Paragraph 4 provides that, when the United States accepts a request for assistance in collection, the claim will be treated by the United States as an assessment as of the time the application was received. Similarly, when Denmark accepts a request, a revenue claim shall be treated by Denmark as an assessment under Danish laws against the taxpayer as of the time the application is received.

Paragraph 5

Paragraph 5 provides that nothing in the Article shall be construed as creating in the requested State any rights of administrative or judicial review of the applicant State’s finally determined revenue claim. Thus, when an application for collection assistance has been accepted, the substantive validity of the applicant State’s revenue claim cannot be challenged in an action in the requested State. Paragraph 5 further provides that, if the applicant’s State’s revenue claim ceases to be finally determined, the applicant State is obligated to withdraw promptly any request that had been based on that claim.

Paragraph 6

Paragraph 6 provides that, as a general rule, the requested State is to forward the entire amount collected to the competent authority of the applicant State. The ordinary costs incurred in providing collection assistance will normally be borne by the requested State and only extraordinary costs will be borne by the applicant State. The application of this paragraph, including rules specifying which collection costs are to be borne by each State and the time and manner of payment of the amounts collected, will be agreed upon by the competent authorities, as provided for in paragraph 11.

Paragraph 7

Paragraph 7 provides that a revenue claim of the applicant State accepted for collection shall not have in the requested State any priority accorded to the revenue claims of the requested

State. Thus, in bankruptcy proceedings, such claim would be treated in the same way as the claim of any other unsecured creditor.

Paragraph 8

Paragraph 8 provides that no assistance is to be given under this Article for a claim in respect of an individual taxpayer, to the extent that the taxpayer can demonstrate that he was a citizen of the requested State during the taxable period to which the revenue claim relates. Similarly, in the case of a company, estate, or trust, no assistance is to be given to the extent that the entity can demonstrate that it derived its status as such under the laws in force in the requested State during the taxable period to which the claim relates.

Paragraph 9

Paragraph 9 provides that each of the Contracting States shall endeavor to collect on behalf of the other Contracting State such amounts as may be necessary to ensure that relief granted by the Convention from taxation imposed by that other State does not inure to the benefit of persons not entitled thereto. For example, if a U.S. source dividend is paid to an addressee in a treaty partner, the withholding agent probably will withhold at the treaty’s portfolio dividend rate of 15 percent. If, however, the addressee is merely acting as a nominee on behalf of a thirdcountry resident, paragraph 9 would obligate the other Contracting State to withhold and remit to the United States the additional tax that should have been collected by the U.S. withholding agent.

Paragraph 10

Paragraph 10 makes clear that the Contracting State asked to collect the tax is not obligated, in the process of providing collection assistance, to carry out administrative measures that are different from those used in the collection of its own taxes, or that would be contrary to its public policy (ordre public).

Paragraph 11

Paragraph 11 requires the competent authorities to agree upon the mode of application of this Article, including agreement to ensure comparable levels of assistance to each of the Contracting States.

Paragraph 12

Paragraph 12 provides that the Contracting State asked to collect the tax is not obligated to accede to the request of the applicant State if the applicant State has not pursued all appropriate collection in its own jurisdiction or in those cases where the administrative burden for the requested State is disproportionate to the benefit to be derived by the applicant State.

Treaty Effective Dates and Termination in Relation to Administrative Assistance

A tax administration may request administrative assistance with respect to a year for

which a treaty was in force after the treaty has been terminated. In such a case the ability of the other tax administration to act is limited. The treaty no longer provides authority for the tax administrations to provide administrative assistance. They may only provide such assistance pursuant to domestic law.

The competent authority also may seek administrative assistance information under the Convention, but with respect to a year in which the prior Convention was in force. The scope of the competent authorities to address such a case is not constrained by the fact that the prior Convention was in force when the transactions at issue occurred, and the competent authorities have available to them the full range of administrative assistance provisions afforded under this Article to the extent they exceed those under the prior Convention.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Denmark Technical Explanation - 2000

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.