Skip to content

ARTICLE 16

U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Denmark Technical Explanation - 2000 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

Directors' Fees

This Article follows the OECD Model and provides that fees and other payments derived by a resident of a Contracting State in his capacity as a member of the board of directors of a company that is a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State. This rule is an exception to the more general rules of Articles 14 (Independent Personal Services) and 15 (Dependent Personal Services). Thus, for example, in determining whether a director’s fee paid to a non-employee director is subject to tax in the country of residence of the corporation, it is not relevant to establish whether the fee is attributable to a fixed base in that State.

The provision in the Convention is identical to the analogous provision in the OECD Model. The U.S. Model reached a different result, providing that the State of residence of the company may tax nonresident directors with no time or dollar threshold, but only with respect to remuneration for services performed in that State.

Because this Article does not restrict taxation by either Contracting State, the saving clause of paragraph 4 of Article 1 (General Scope) is irrelevant. If a U.S. citizen who is a Danish resident is a director of a Danish corporation, the United States may tax his full remuneration for those services, subject, however, to the special provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 23 (Relief from Double Taxation).

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Denmark Technical Explanation - 2000

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.