Skip to content

Chapter 3.24 — CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY

Temecula Municipal Code · 2026-07 edition · updated 2026-09-27 · Temecula

§ 3.24.010. Claims for money or damages.

As a prerequisite to bringing suit thereon against the city or any officer, employee, department, commission or board of the city, any claim for money or damages, including claims which would otherwise be excepted by Section 905 of the Government Code of California, which is not governed by any other statute or regulation expressly relating thereto, shall be presented and acted upon in accordance with Title 1, Division 3.6, Part 3, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910), of the California Government Code. This section shall relate only to the bringing of suit upon any claim, and shall not be deemed to apply to the authority of the director of finance and general services, the city council and other city officers to process and pay, in the ordinary course of business, the just obligations of the city, such as routine salaries and wages, principal and interest on bonds, payments for purchases, and other like expenditures for which there is an express budget appropriation, and in connection with which there is no dispute as to the obligation and amount being payable. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (3.16.010))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.020. Applicability of claims—Other public entities.

Pursuant to Section 935 of the Government Code, all claims against the city for money, damage, or indemnification by any public entity which is exempted by Section 905(i) of the Government Code from the provisions of Division 3.6 of the Government Code (Section 810 et seq.), including but not limited to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 900) and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 910), and is not governed by any other statutes or regulations expressly relating thereto, shall be governed by the procedure prescribed in Sections 3.24.020 through 3.24.070.

(Ord. 93-04 § 11 (3.16.012))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.030. Presentation of claim as prerequisite to suit by other public entities.

No suit for money, damages or indemnification may be brought against the city by any public entity described in Section 3.24.020 until a written claim therefor has been presented and acted upon, or has been deemed to have been rejected, in accordance with this chapter and Sections 945.4, 945.6, and 946 of the Government Code.

(Ord. 93-04 § 11 (3.16.013))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.040. Time limitation for presentation of claim by other public entities.

Any claim specified in Section 3.24.030 shall be presented in accordance with the time limitations set forth in Government Code Section 911.2. In addition, pursuant to Government Code Section 901, any claim against the city for equitable indemnity or partial equitable indemnity shall be presented not later than six months after the date upon which a defendant is served with the complaint giving rise to the defendant's claim for a cause of action for equitable indemnity or partial equitable indemnity against the city. (Ord. 93-04 § 11 (3.16.014))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.050. Late filing of claims by other public entities.

In accordance with Section 935 of the Government Code, the late filing of claims pursuant to this chapter is regulated by Sections911.4 and 911.6 through 912.2, inclusive, of the Government Code.

(Ord. 93-04 § 11 (3.16.015))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.060. Presentation and contents of claims filed by other public entities.

A signed, written claim shall be presented to the city by mailing or delivering it to the city clerk. The claim shall conform to the requirements of Section 910 of the Government Code or to a form provided by the city, if such form is provided.

(Ord. 93-04 § 11 (3.16.016))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.070. Procedures for consideration of claim filed by other public entities.

Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, the procedure for consideration and action upon all claims filed pursuant to this chapter shall be the same as the procedure provided and required by Section910.2 through 915.4, inclusive, of the Government Code, except Section 911.2. In accordance with Section 935 of the Government Code, the consideration and action upon claims presented pursuant to Section 3.24.050 of this chapter shall be the same as the procedure provided and required by Section 946.6 of the Government Code. (Ord. 93-04 § 11 (3.16.017))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.080. Auditing prerequisite to payment.

No payment shall be made from the city treasury or out of the funds of the city unless the demand which is to be paid is duly audited as prescribed herein or by other provisions of law. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (3.16.020))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.090. Forms for demands.

Claims against the city shall be paid on demands on the treasury as herein provided on forms to be prescribed by the city manager. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (3.16.030))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.100. Departmental approval of claims.

Except for tort claims, every claim and demand received against the city shall be first presented to and approve in writing by the receiving department or office, which shall certify to the actual delivery or rendition of the supplies, materials, property or service for which payment is claimed. The receiving department or office shall also certify that the quality and prices correspond with the original specifications and contracts, if any, upon which the claim is based, that the demand in all other respects is proper and valid, and shall indicate the budgetary account to which said demand is to be charged.

(Ord. 90-02 § 1 (3.16.040))

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.110. Approval of demands by director of finance.

Each demand approved by the receiving department or office shall be presented to the director of finance, who shall recommend approval or disapproval of the demand to the city manager based upon his or her determination of whether the following findings can be made with respect to each demand:

  • A. The demand is legally due and owing by the city;

  • B. There are appropriated funds available to pay the demand pursuant to the budget or other appropriation of the city council approved by resolution;

  • C. The demand conforms to a valid requisition or order;

  • D. The prices and computations shown on the demand are verified; and

  • E. The demand contains the approval of other departments and officials as required. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (3.16.050); Ord. 02-02 § 1)

Exceptions & meaning →

§ 3.24.120. Approval of warrants by city manager.

The city manager is hereby authorized to issue a check or warrant pursuant to Government Code Sections 37208 and 53911 upon completion of the review of the demands by the director of finance and the city manager's determination of whether the findings set forth in Section 3.24.110 of the Temecula Municipal Code can be made with respect to each demand. Checks issued by the city manager pursuant to this procedure must be signed by two officials of the city as designated by resolution of the city council. The register of warrants or checks so issued by the city manager shall be presented to the city council for review at a public meeting. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (3.16.060); Ord. 02-02 § 2)

CHAPTER 3.28 PURCHASING

Exceptions & meaning →

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Temecula Municipal Code

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.