Skip to content

Title 22 — Development Agreements

Chapter 22.06 — HEARING PROCEDURES

Stanislaus County Planning Code · 2026-07 edition · updated 2026-07-25 · Stanislaus County

§ 22.06.010. Notice.

The planning director shall give all notices of the county's intention to consider adoption of a development agreement and of any other public hearing required by law or this title. (Ord. CS 370 §1, 1990)

§ 22.06.020. Failure to receive notice.

The failure of any person to receive notice shall not prevent the county from entering into nor shall it invalidate a development agreement entered into by the county under this title. (Ord. CS 370 §1, 1990)

§ 22.06.030. Rules governing conduct of hearings.

All the public hearings under this chapter shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures and the time limits specified for the conduct of zoning hearings in accordance with the Stanislaus County ordinance. A copy of any proposed development agreement shall be made available for public

review at the department of planning and community development prior to the date of any hearing thereon. (Ord. CS 370 §1, 1990)

§ 22.06.040. Irregularity in proceeding.

Formal rules of evidence or procedure which must be followed in a court of law shall not be applied in the consideration of a proposed development agreement under this title and the provisions of this chapter shall provide the procedure for such consideration. No action, inaction or recommendation regarding the proposed development agreement shall be held void or invalid or be set aside by a court on the ground of improper admission or rejection of evidence or by reason of any error, irregularity, informality, neglect or omission ("error") as to any matter pertaining to petition application, notice, finding, record, hearing, report, recommendation or any matters of procedure whatever; unless after an examination of the entire case, including the evidence, the court finds that the error complained of was prejudicial and that by reason of the error, the complaining party sustained and suffered substantial injury, and that a different result would have been probable if the error had not occurred or existed. There is no presumption that error is prejudicial or that injury resulted if error is shown.

(Ord. CS 370 §1, 1990)

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
Contents — Stanislaus County Planning Code

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.