Labor and Employment Code›Division II — CITY CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEE PROVISIONS›Article 102 — MISCELLANEOUS PREVAILING WAGE
San Francisco County Municipal Code § 102.11 Security Guard Services in City Contracts and for
San Francisco County Municipal Code · 2026-09 edition · updated 2026-10-22 · San Francisco County
Cite as: San Francisco County Municipal Code § 102.11 · Text as of 2026-10-22
EVENTS ON CITY PROPERTY. 1 (a) Definitions. For purposes of this Section 102.11, the following definitions shall apply: “Event” means any organized gathering of people, including but not limited to a live performance, dance, convention, conference, parade, or exposition on City property. “Security Guard Services” means services to protect persons or property or prevent theft, performed by nonsupervisory employees who are licensed by the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (BSIS) or a successor agency to provide security guard or proprietary security guard service, including but not limited to men and women serving as security guards, watchmen, patrolmen, and security officers. (b) City Contracts. (1) Prevailing Wage Requirement. Every Contract issued by the City must require that any individual performing Security Guard Services thereunder at any facility or on any property owned or leased by the City be paid not less than the Prevailing Rate of Wages. All Contracts subject to this Section 102.11 shall include a provision in which the Contractor agrees to comply with, and to require Subcontractors to comply with, the obligations imposed by this Section. (2) Exclusions. For purposes of this subsection (b), “Contract” shall mean an agreement to be performed at the expense of the City or to be paid out of moneys deposited in the City treasury or out of trust moneys under the control of or collected by the City, but shall not include the following: (A) Contracts issued by the Airport Commission or to be performed at any facility owned, leased, or otherwise under the jurisdiction of the Airport Commission. (B) Contracts for a cumulative amount of $10,000 or less per Security Guard Services provider in each fiscal year. Contracts may not be split for purposes of evading the requirements of this Section 102.11. (c) Events on City Property. (1) Prevailing Wage Requirement. Every Contract, Lease, Franchise, Permit, or Agreement awarded, let, issued, or granted by the City for the use of property owned by the City must require that any Individual engaged in Security Guard Services for an Event on City property be paid not less than the Prevailing Rate of Wages. All Contracts, Leases, Franchises, Permits, or Agreements subject to this Section 102.11 shall include a provision in which the Contractor (including a lessee, franchisee, permittee, or other party to an Agreement) agrees to comply with, and to require Subcontractors to comply with, the obligations imposed by this Section. (2) Exclusions. For purposes of this subsection (c), “Contract, Lease, Franchise, Permit, or Agreement” shall mean an agreement with the City for the use of property owned by the City, but shall not include any contract, lease, franchise, permit, or agreement for: (A) Celebration of a marriage, domestic partnership, or similar civil union; (B) The presentation of an Event to which the public has free access when the Event is in a public park, on a public street, or on property under the jurisdiction of the Port Commission, and the advertising and promotion for the Event is less than $10,000; (C) Any permit or agreement to engage in film production pursuant to Chapter 57 of the Administrative Code or under the circumstances set forth in Section 57.7 of the Administrative Code, (D) In any circumstance where application of this Section 102.11 would be preempted by federal or State law; or (E) Any Event for which the total number of employees providing Security Guard Services for the Event is less than 15 persons. (d) Preemption. Nothing in this Section 102.11 shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any right, power, or duty in conflict with any federal or State law. (e) Prospective Effect. This Section 102.11 is intended to have prospective effect only, and shall not be interpreted to impair the obligations of any pre-existing Contract, Lease, Franchise, Permit, or Agreement”2 issued or entered into by the City, unless such pre-existing agreement is amended after the effective date of this Section and such amendment extends the term of the pre-existing agreement. (f) Severability. If any part or provision of this Section 102.11, or the application thereof to any Person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Section, including the application of such part or provisions to other Persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Section are severable. (Added as Administrative Code Sec. 21C.11 by Ord. 211-16, File No. 160891, App. 10/28/2016, Eff. 11/27/2016; redesignated by Ord. 221-23, File No. 230835, App. 11/3/2023, Eff. 12/4/2023, Oper. 1/4/2024; amended by Ord. 296-24, File No. 240985, App. 12/19/2024, Eff. 1/19/2025, Oper. 2/19/2025)
CODIFICATION NOTES
- Ord. 211-16, Section 4, states: “as indicated in Administrative Code Section 21 C.11(e) (now in Labor and Employment Code Section 102.11(e)), Section 21 C.11 (now at Section 102.11) shall become operative only upon the initial setting by the Board of Supervisors of a Prevailing Rate of Wages for the categories of work covered by that section.”
- So in Ord. 211-16.
Continue researching
San Francisco County sources →San Francisco County local, state and federal sources. Edit the document title or filters, then run your search.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code