Skip to content

Chapter 29B — CHILD CARE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CITY AND CITYFUNDED PROJECTS

San Francisco Administrative Code · 2026-08 edition · updated 2026-09-09 · San Francisco

CHAPTER 29B: CHILD CARE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CITY AND CITY-FUNDED PROJECTS

Sec. 29B.1. Applicability.
Sec. 29B.2. Definitions.
Sec. 29B.3. Purpose.
Sec. 29B.4. Child Care Feasibility Study.
Sec. 29B.5. Annual Report by City Administrator.
Sec. 29B.6. Severability.

SEC. 29B.1. APPLICABILITY.

(a) This Chapter shall be applicable to:

(1) a City development project of 50,000 gross square feet or more ; and

(2) a privately-sponsored development project of 50,000 gross square feet or more receiving any funds controlled by the City and County of San Francisco unless the developer is required to comply with Planning Code Section 414 et seq.

(Added by Ord. 1-11, File No. 101094, App. 1/6/2011)

SEC. 29B.2. DEFINITIONS.

(1) "Child Care Feasibility Study" or "Feasibility Study." A study described in Section 29B.4.

(2) "City agency." An Office, Board, Department, Commission, or other unit of government of the City and County of San Francisco.

(3) "Development project" or "project." A project to (a) construct a new building, (b) purchase an existing building, (c) perform alterations to more than 50 percent of the gross square footage of an existing building, or (d) lease more than 50 percent of the space in a privately-owned building for an initial term of more than one year. It shall not include a building that will not be used primarily for human occupancy.

(4) "Project sponsor." The City agency or private developer of a project subject to this Chapter. (Added by Ord. 1-11, File No. 101094, App. 1/6/2011)

SEC. 29B.3. PURPOSE.

The purpose of this Chapter is to ensure that San Francisco is a leader in the provision of child care, that City agencies understand their employee's child care needs, and that any new demand for child care services that a proposed development project would generate is considered early in the project development process and included as part of the total project budget. This will enhance the performance and morale of City employees by offering the opportunity for quality child care in a City-owned or controlled space, and increase the availability of quality child care options in the City and County of San Francisco.

(Added by Ord. 1-11, File No. 101094, App. 1/6/2011)

SEC. 29B.4. CHILD CARE FEASIBILITY STUDY.

(a) Preparation of Study. A City agency or private developer that is subject to the requirements of this Chapter 29B shall prepare a Child Care Feasibility Study that considers the build out and tenant improvements of a child care center on the project site that contains the information required in subsection (d) below and has the minimum features described in subsection (e). The Feasibility Study shall be prepared at an early stage in the project design when budgeting and other planning decisions are made and must be completed and submitted as required by subsection (b) (2) below prior to any funding approvals.

The sponsor of a development project subject to this Article shall consult with the Department of Early Childhood (the “Department”) in preparing the Child Care Feasibility Study. The Department shall be responsible for providing all of the necessary data on the child care needs generated by a specific project, or otherwise related to a specific project. The Department would provide the child care data for demographics, existing area deficiencies, availability, and pricing. The Department would also provide a list of appropriate consultants that have the expertise to conduct a child care feasibility study, as well as any technical assistance related to the understanding and effective use of the child care data required in the feasibility study. This would also ensure that the sponsoring department discusses the project with the Department staff and would ensure that the Department can educate the sponsoring department and/or their hired consultants about how to successfully implement child care services where a need is identified.

(b) Submission to the City Administrator, the Child Care Facilities Interagency Committee, Funding Entities, and Board of Supervisors.

(1)1 The Feasibility Study shall be submitted to the City Administrator by the City agency involved in either proposing or funding the development project prior to either (A) the purchase or lease of the building or (B) the submission of an environmental evaluation application, application for a building permit, or application for other project approvals by the City, whichever is applicable.

(2) Prior to the City's approval of funding for the development project, the sponsor shall submit the Child Care Feasibility Study to the funding entity for its consideration, including the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, and any applicable agencies or commissions, including the Child Care Facilities Interagency Committee.

(3) If the project is subject to the Fiscal Responsibility and Feasibility requirements of Chapter 29 of this Code, the Child Care Feasibility Study shall be presented to the Board of Supervisors at the same time the information required by Chapter 29 is required to be presented.

(c) Waiver of Requirement. The City Administrator is authorized to waive the requirement to prepare a Child Care Feasibility Study under the following circumstances. Any waiver granted by the City Administrator must be in writing and shall set forth the specific reason or reasons why the waiver has been granted.

(1) The City Administrator shall waive the requirement if:

(A) the project sponsor has made a determination that the proposed development project will include an on-site child care center, or

(B) the proposed development project is under the jurisdiction of the Port of San Francisco, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, or other City agency where the agency contends, and the City Attorney agrees, that the use of agency funds to support the establishment or operation of a child care center as described in this Chapter is prohibited by State law, the San Francisco Charter, or other local law.

(2) The City Administrator may waive the requirement if:

(A) The project sponsor has documented that including an on-site child care center in the project is infeasible because the site cannot meet, or be remodeled to meet, the State of California child care licensing requirements.

(B) The project sponsor has provided evidence sufficient to establish that including a child care center on site is infeasible without the necessity of preparing a Feasibility Study. Such reasons include, but are not limited to space or legal constraints. In the case of legal constraints, the City Attorney must agree that they apply.

(d) Required Information. The Feasibility Study shall include and document the following information, in addition to any other information that the City Administrator requires or that the City agency proposing and/or funding the project deems relevant:

  • (1) Project Description:

  • (A) a description of the proposed development project;

  • (B) the estimated total cost of the project.

  • (2) Population and Need:

  • (A) the total number of City employees within a two-to-three mile radius of the project location (the "target area");

  • (B) the number of City employees who have indicated they would use the child care center; and

(C) the number and ages of children 3 months to five years old in the target area.

  • (3) Community Impact:

  • (A) the number of existing child care centers serving the general public that are in the target area;

(B) the licensed capacity of existing child care centers in the target area and the number of vacant spaces;

  • (4) Cost:

  • (A) the estimated start-up cost for construction or renovation of space for an on-site child care facility and identification of any source of funding;

(B) the estimated cost of appliances, permanent fixtures, furnishings and equipment to appropriately furnish the child care center; and

  • (C) the estimated annual cost of providing the space for the child care center.

(e) Minimum Requirements. In preparing the Feasibility Study required by this Chapter, the following assumptions shall be made:

  • (1) The child care center shall be a licensed facility.

(2) The child care center shall have a minimum gross floor area of 3,000 square feet of usable interior space and access to dedicated exterior space of at least 1,500 square feet.

(3) The space for the child care center shall be provided to a nonprofit child care provider without charge for rent, utilities, property taxes, building services, repairs, or other charges of any nature.

(4) Unless otherwise indicated in the Feasibility Study (with reasons supporting the proposed alternative priorities), the child care center shall provide for the following priority of enrollment:

(A) City employees working in the building shall have first priority for child care space;

(B) If space is available, all City employees shall have the second priority for child care space; and

(C) If space is available, San Francisco residents shall have the third priority for child care space.

(f) Approval by the Department. The consultant that prepares the Child Care Feasibility Study required by this Chapter 29B shall be on the list of consultants approved by the San Francisco2 Department as qualified to prepare the Feasibility Study. If the City agency or private sponsor of a development project subject to this Chapter wishes to use either its own staff or a consultant that is not on the Department list, it must obtain the prior written approval of that Office.

(g) If a City agency proposes an office development project, as defined in Section 401 of the San Francisco Planning Code, that creates a need for additional child care services and has decided not to provide new child care services as part of the proposed project, the sponsoring agency shall provide evidence to the agencies approving the

project that the sponsor fairly considered providing child care services early in project development and why such services would not be provided.

(Added by Ord. 1-11, File No. 101094, App. 1/6/2011; amended by Ord. 156-13 , File No. 130300, App. 7/25/2013, Eff. 8/24/2013; Ord. 189-22, File No. 220808, App. 9/8/2022, Eff. 10/9/2022) CODIFICATION NOTES

  1. For clarity and consistency, the codifier has adjusted the designation of the subdivisions of division (b) of this section.

  2. So in Ord. 189-22.

SEC. 29B.5. ANNUAL REPORT BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR.

One year after the effective date of this Chapter 29B, and every year thereafter, the City Administrator shall prepare and submit to the Board of Supervisors a report that summarizes any waivers that have been granted pursuant to subsection (c) of this Chapter.1 A copy of the Annual Report shall also be provided to the San Francisco Child Care Planning and Advisory Council, the Child Care Facilities Interagency Committee, and the Department. (Added by Ord. 1-11, File No. 101094, App. 1/6/2011; amended by Ord. 156-13 , File No. 130300, App. 7/25/2013, Eff. 8/24/2013; Ord. 189-22, File No. 220808, App. 9/8/2022, Eff. 10/9/2022)

CODIFICATION NOTE

  1. So in Ord. 1-11.

SEC. 29B.6. SEVERABILITY.

If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Chapter 29B is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Chapter 29B. The Board of Supervisors declares that it would have passed each section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Chapter 29B irrespective of the fact that any portion of this Chapter 29B could be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. (Added by Ord. 1-11, File No. 101094, App. 1/6/2011)

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
Contents — San Francisco Administrative Code
San Francisco Administrative Code
  1. Chapter 1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
  2. Chapter 2 — BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
  3. Chapter 2A — EXECUTIVE BRANCH
  4. Chapter 2B — ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARDS (TAX APPEAL BOARDS)
  5. Chapter 3 — BUDGET PROCEDURES
  6. Chapter 4 — CITY BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT, AND VEHICLES
  7. Chapter 5 — ADVISORY BODIES AND COMMISSIONS
  8. Chapter 6 — PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
  9. Chapter 7 — DISASTER COUNCIL
  10. Chapter 8 — DOCUMENTS, RECORDS AND PUBLICATIONS
  11. Chapter 9A — FARMERS' MARKET
  12. Chapter 9B — FLEA MARKET
  13. Chapter 10 — FINANCE, TAXATION, AND OTHER FISCAL MATTERS
  14. Chapter 10A — [REQUEST FOR SHERIFF’S SERVICES]
  15. Chapter 10B — SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES
  16. Chapter 10C — REIMBURSEMENT FOR TOWING AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES
  17. Chapter 10E — PLANNING MONITORING
  18. Chapter 10F — 1660 MISSION STREET SURCHARGE
  19. Chapter 10G — BOARD OF APPEALS SURCHARGE FOR PERMITS AND FEES
  20. Chapter 10H — RECOVERY OF COSTS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE
  21. Chapter 11 — FRANCHISES
  22. Chapter 12 — HOUSING AUTHORITY
  23. Chapter 12A — HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
  24. Chapter 12D — MINORITY/WOMEN/LOCAL BUSINESS UTILIZATION
  25. Chapter 12E — BAN ON CITY USE OF GAS-POWERED LANDSCAPING EQUIP…
  26. Chapter 12F — IMPLEMENTING THE MACBRIDE PRINCIPLES - NORTHERN …
  27. Chapter 12H — IMMIGRATION STATUS
  28. Chapter 12I — CIVIL IMMIGRATION DETAINERS
  29. Chapter 12L — PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS AND MEETINGS OF NONPROF…
  30. Chapter 12M — PROTECTION OF PRIVATE INFORMATION
  31. Chapter 12N — LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, QUEER, AND …
  32. Chapter 12S — WORKING FAMILIES CREDIT PROGRAM
  33. Chapter 12Y — SAN FRANCISCO SLAVERY DISCLOSURE ORDINANCE
  34. Chapter 13 — JAILS AND PRISONERS
  35. Chapter 14A — DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM
  36. Chapter 14B — LOCAL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE UTILIZATION AND NONDIS…
  37. Chapter 14C — [EXPIRED]
  38. Chapter 15 — MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE
  39. Chapter 16 — OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES GENERALLY
  40. Chapter 17 — PUBLIC OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES
  41. Chapter 18 — PAYROLL PROCEDURE
  42. Chapter 19 — PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA ORDINANCE
  43. Chapter 19A — PUBLIC HEALTH
  44. Chapter 19B — ACQUISITION OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
  45. Chapter 20 — SOCIAL SERVICES
  46. Chapter 21 — ACQUISITION OF COMMODITIES AND SERVICES
  47. Chapter 21A — HEALTH-RELATED COMMODITIES AND SERVICES
  48. Chapter 21B — CORE INITIATIVES ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS, DRUG O…
  49. Chapter 21D — FOOD PURCHASES AT HOSPITALS OPERATED BY THE DEPA…
  50. Chapter 21E — GOODS OR SERVICES CONTRACTS FOR INCARCERATED PER…
  51. Chapter 21F — SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SOCIAL…
  52. Chapter 21G — GRANTS
  53. Chapter 21H — PROCUREMENT OF FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
  54. Chapter 22 — RADIO COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
  55. Chapter 22A — INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
  56. Chapter 22B — TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
  57. Chapter 22C — PUBLIC INTERNET ACCESS
  58. Chapter 22D — OPEN DATA POLICY
  59. Chapter 22E — CITY-OWNED FIBER-OPTIC FACILITIES
  60. Chapter 22G — OFFICE OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGY
  61. Chapter 22H — DESIGNATION UNDER HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY A…
  62. Chapter 22I — OFFICE OF CYBER SECURITY AND DUTIES OF THE CHIEF…
  63. Chapter 22J — ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS
  64. Chapter 23 — REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS
  65. Chapter 23A — SURPLUS PUBLIC LANDS ORDINANCE
  66. Chapter 24 — REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
  67. Chapter 24A — ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE LOCAL RENT SUPPLEMENT P…
  68. Chapter 25 — STREET LIGHTING
  69. Chapter 26 — [RESERVED]
  70. Chapter 27 — HEALTHY NAIL SALON RECOGNITION PROGRAM
  71. Chapter 28 — ADMINISTRATIVE DEBARMENT PROCEDURE
  72. Chapter 29 — FINDINGS OF FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FEASIBILITY
  73. Chapter 29A — APPROVAL OF POWER PLANT; PLANNING CODE SEC. 303(q)
  74. Chapter 29B — CHILD CARE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR CITY AND CITYFU…
  75. Chapter 30 — CENTRALIZATION OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
  76. Chapter 31 — CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PROCEDURES A…
  77. Chapter 32 — RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM
  78. Chapter 33 — COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN
  79. Chapter 33A — LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVE…
  80. Chapter 34 — NOTIFICATION TO ASSESSOR CONCERNING ZONING RECLAS…
  81. Chapter 35 — RESIDENTIAL, HOTEL, AND PDR COMPATIBILITY AND PRO…
  82. Chapter 36 — COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS AREA PLANS AND PROGRAMS
  83. Chapter 37 — RESIDENTIAL RENT STABILIZATION AND ARBITRATION OR…
  84. Chapter 37A — RENT STABILIZATION AND ARBITRATION FEE
  85. Chapter 37B — MIDTOWN PARK APARTMENTS
  86. Chapter 38 — COMMERCIAL LANDLORDS; ACCESS IMPROVEMENT OBLIGATI…
  87. Chapter 39 — [RIGHT TO RETURN TO REVITALIZED PUBLIC HOUSING]
  88. Chapter 40 — HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT LOAN PROGRAM
  89. Chapter 41 — RESIDENTIAL HOTEL UNIT CONVERSION AND DEMOLITION
  90. Chapter 41A — RESIDENTIAL UNIT CONVERSION AND DEMOLITION
  91. Chapter 41B — COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE ACT
  92. Chapter 41C — TIME-SHARE CONVERSION ORDINANCE
  93. Chapter 41D — RESIDENTIAL HOTEL VISITOR POLICIES
  94. Chapter 41E — RESIDENTIAL HOTEL MAIL RECEPTACLE ORDINANCE
  95. Chapter 41F — TOURIST HOTEL CONVERSION
  96. Chapter 41G — RESIDENTIAL HOTEL COVID-19 PROTECTIONS
  97. Chapter 42 — [RESERVED]
  98. Chapter 43 — MUNICIPAL FINANCE LAW
  99. Title 1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
  100. Title 2 — FINANCING RESIDENCES
  101. Title 3 — BONDS
  102. Title 4 — SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
  103. Title 1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
  104. Title 2 — FINANCING FACILITIES
  105. Title 3 — BONDS
  106. Title 4 — SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
  107. Title 1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
  108. Title 2 — PROVISIONS RELATING TO FORMATION OF DISTRICTS
  109. Title 3 — PROVISIONS RELATING TO BONDS
  110. Title 4 — SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
  111. Title 5 — CHANGE PROCEEDINGS
  112. Title 1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS
  113. Title 2 — RESIDENCES
  114. Title 3 — BONDS
  115. Title 4 — SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.