Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2012-51 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
Treatment of Certain Amounts Paid to Section 170(c) Organizations Under Certain Employer Leave-Based Donation Programs to Aid Victims of Hurricane Sandy
Notice 2012–69
In view of the extreme need for charitable relief in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, employers may have adopted or may be considering adopting leave-based donation programs to aid victims of this hurricane. Under these programs employees elect to forgo vacation, sick, or personal leave in exchange for cash payments an employer makes to organizations described in § 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (§ 170(c) organizations) for the relief of victims of Hurricane Sandy. This notice provides guidance on the treatment of these payments for income and employment tax purposes.
Notice 2005–68, 2005–2 C.B. 622, provided similar guidance in view of the extreme need for charitable relief following Hurricane Katrina. See also Notice 2001–69, 2001–2 C.B. 491, as modified and superseded by Notice 2003–1, 2003–1 C.B. 257, regarding charitable relief following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. This guidance is provided in view of the extraordinary damage and destruction caused by Hurricane Sandy.
The Service will not assert that cash payments an employer makes to § 170(c) organizations in exchange for vacation, sick, or personal leave that its employees elect to forgo constitute gross income or wages of the employees if the payments are: (1) made to the § 170(c) organizations for the relief of victims of Hurricane Sandy; and (2) paid to the § 170(c) organizations before January 1, 2014.
Similarly, the Service will not assert that the opportunity to make such an election results in constructive receipt of gross income or wages for employees. Electing employees may not claim a charitable contribution deduction under § 170 with respect to the value of forgone leave excluded from compensation and wages.
The Service will not assert that an employer will be only permitted to deduct
these cash payments under the rules of § 170 rather than the rules of § 162. Cash payments to which this guidance applies need not be included in Box 1, 3 (if applicable), or 5 of an employee’s Form W–2, Wage and Tax Statement .
For further information, please contact Sheldon A. Iskow of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting) at (202) 622–4920 (not a tollfree call).
Notice 2012–70
I. Purpose
This notice extends the deadline, as set forth in Notice 2011–96, 2011–52 I.R.B. 915, to amend a defined benefit plan to satisfy the requirements of § 436 of the Internal Revenue Code and provides associated relief from the requirements of § 411(d)(6).
II. Background
Section 401(b) provides a period during which a plan may be amended retroactively to comply with the Code’s qualification requirements. Section 1.401(b)–1 and Rev. Proc. 2007–44, 2007–2 C.B. 54, describe the disqualifying provisions that may be amended retroactively and the remedial amendment period during which retroactive amendments may be adopted. The regulations also grant the Commissioner the discretion to extend the remedial amendment period.
Section 5.05 of Rev. Proc. 2007–44 provides that when there are statutory or regulatory changes to the plan qualification requirements that will impact provisions of the written plan document, the adoption of an interim amendment will generally be required by the later of the end of the plan year in which the change is first effective or the due date of the employer’s tax return for the tax year that includes the date the change is first effective. Pursuant to section 5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–44, an interim amendment is an amendment with respect to a plan provision that is a disqualifying provision because the provision (1) causes the plan to fail to satisfy the qualification requirements of the Code by reason of a change in those require
ments, or (2) is integral to a changed qualification requirement, but only if the provision is also integral to a plan provision that is a disqualifying provision under (1). A change in a qualification requirement includes a statutory change or a change in the requirements provided in regulations or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. A disqualifying provision includes the absence from a plan of a provision required by or, if applicable, integral to the applicable change in the qualification requirements of the Code.
The filing of a determination letter application for an individually designed plan generally requires the plan to be restated to take into account changes in qualification requirements and guidance that are listed in the Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements in effect at the time the application is filed. (See sections 4 and 12.03 of Rev. Proc. 2007–44.) Section 411(d)(6) provides, generally, that a plan will not satisfy § 401(a) if an amendment to the plan decreases a participant’s accrued benefit. For this purpose, a plan amendment that has the effect of eliminating or reducing an early retirement benefit or a retirement-type subsidy or eliminating an optional form of benefit with respect to benefits attributable to service before the amendment is treated as reducing accrued benefits. Section 401(b) does not relieve a plan of the requirement to satisfy § 411(d)(6) with respect to any amendment.
Section 1.411(d)–4, A–2(b)(2)(i), provides that a plan may be amended to eliminate or reduce a § 411(d)(6) protected benefit, within the meaning of § 1.411(d)–4, A–1, if the following requirements are met: the amendment constitutes timely compliance with a change in law affecting plan qualification; there is an exercise of § 7805(b) relief by the Commissioner; and the elimination or reduction is made only to the extent necessary to enable the plan to continue to satisfy the requirements for qualified plans.
Notice 2011–96 provides a sample plan amendment that a sponsor of a single employer defined benefit plan may adopt to amend the terms of the plan to satisfy the requirements of § 436, relating to benefit restrictions that apply to underfunded
2012–51 I.R.B. 712 December 17, 2012
In addition, pursuant to § 7805(b) and § 1.411(d)–4, A–2(b)(2)(i), this notice also provides that a plan amendment adopted with respect to § 436 that eliminates or reduces a § 411(d)(6) protected benefit does not cause the plan to fail to meet the anticutback requirements of § 411(d)(6) if the amendment is adopted by the deadline described above and the elimination or reduction is made only to the extent necessary to enable the plan to meet the requirements of § 436.
IV. Effect on Other Documents
Notice 2011–96 is modified.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this notice is Angelique Carrington of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. Questions regarding this revenue procedure may be sent via e-mail to retirementplanquestions@irs.gov .
Guidance on Regulations to be Issued Regarding the Deduction and Capitalization of Expenditures Related to Tangible Property
Notice 2012–73
PURPOSE
This notice alerts taxpayers that the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department expect to issue final regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property in 2013, and that the Service and the Treasury Department anticipate that the final regulations will contain changes from the temporary regulations (T.D. 9564, 76 Fed. Reg. 81060–01 [2012–14 I.R.B. 614]). The Service and the Treasury Department anticipate that the final regulations will apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, and will permit taxpayers to apply the final regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012. This notice also advises taxpayers that shortly after publication of this notice the Service and the Treasury Department will publish in the Federal Register a Treasury Decision
plans. Notice 2011–96 also provides that the deadline to adopt an interim amendment for § 436 is the latest of:
(1) the last day of the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2012,
(2) the last day of the plan year for which § 436 is first effective for the plan, or
(3) the due date (including extensions) of the employer’s tax return for the tax year (determined in accordance with section 5.06(2) of Rev. Proc. 2007–44, in the case of a tax-exempt employer) that contains the first day of the plan year for which § 436 is first effective for the plan.
However, if an application for a determination letter for an individually designed plan is filed on or after February 1, 2012 (or, in the case of an eligible cooperative, charity, or PBGC settlement plan described in section 104 or 105 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA ’06), Pub. L. 109–280, as amended, the first day of the plan year for which § 436 is first effective for the plan, if later), Notice 2011–96 requires the restated plan submitted with the application to incorporate an interim amendment with respect to § 436.
Pursuant to § 7805(b) and § 1.411(d)–4, A–2(b)(2)(i), Notice 2011–96 also provides that a plan amendment adopted with respect to § 436 that eliminates or reduces a § 411(d)(6) protected benefit does not cause a plan to fail to meet the anti-cutback requirements of § 411(d)(6) if the amendment is adopted by the deadline described above and the elimination or reduction is made only to the extent necessary to enable the plan to meet the requirements of § 436.
Notice 2011–97, 2011–52 I.R.B. 923, contains the Cumulative List of Changes in Plan Qualification Requirements, as described in section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2007–44, for 2011 (the “2011 Cumulative List”). The 2011 Cumulative List is to be used by plan sponsors and practitioners submitting determination letter applications for plans during the period beginning February 1, 2012, and ending January 31, 2013. The Service’s review of plans submitted during this period will take into account the changes in law and guidance on the 2011 Cumulative List. Footnote 2 of Notice 2011–97 provides that the Service will not consider the requirements of § 436 in its review of any determination letter application submitted
during the period beginning February 1, 2012, and ending January 31, 2013.
III. Extension of Amendment Deadline and Associated Relief under § 411(d)(6)
As noted in section II of this notice, pursuant to Notice 2011–96, an interim amendment to satisfy the requirements of § 436 would generally be required to be adopted by the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2012. If an application for a determination letter for the plan were filed on or after February 1, 2012, an amendment for § 436 generally would need to be incorporated in the restated plan that is submitted with the application. However, an application for a determination letter that is filed during the 12-month submission period beginning on February 1, 2012, would not be reviewed with respect to the requirements of § 436.
To ensure that a plan amendment for § 436 is not required to be included in a plan that is filed for a determination letter with the Service when the Service will not consider such an amendment in its review of the determination letter application, Notice 2011–96 is modified. In particular, the deadline to adopt an interim amendment for § 436 is extended to the latest of:
(a) the last day of the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2013,
(b) the last day of the plan year for which § 436 is first effective for the plan, or
(c) the due date (including extensions) of the employer’s tax return for the tax year (determined in accordance with section 5.06(2) of Rev. Proc. 2007–44, in the case of a tax-exempt employer) that contains the first day of the plan year for which § 436 is first effective for the plan.
However, if an application for a determination letter for an individually designed plan is filed on or after February 1, 2013 (or, in the case of a plan described in section 104 or 105 of PPA ’06, as amended, the first day of the plan year for which § 436 is first effective for the plan, if later), the restated plan submitted with the application must incorporate an amendment with respect to § 436. As noted in section 12.03 of Rev. Proc. 2007–44, the filing of a determination letter application may accelerate the time by which the plan must be amended to satisfy the requirements of § 436.
December 17, 2012 713 2012–51 I.R.B.
CONTACT INFORMATION
For further information concerning this notice, contact Merrill D. Feldstein or Alan S. Williams, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting), (202) 622–4950 (not a toll-free call).
Branded Prescription Drug Fee; Guidance for the 2013 Fee Year
Notice 2012–74
Purpose
This notice provides guidance on the branded prescription drug fee for the 2013 fee year related to (1) the submission of Form 8947, “ Report of Branded Prescrip- tion Drug Information,” (2) the time and manner for notifying covered entities of their preliminary fee calculation, (3) the time and manner for submitting error reports for the dispute resolution process, and (4) the time for notifying covered entities of their final fee calculation.
Background
An annual fee on covered entities engaged in the business of manufacturing or importing branded prescription drugs is imposed by section 9008 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111–148 (124 Stat. 119 (2010)), as amended by section 1404 of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111–152 (124 Stat. 1029 (2010)).
The Branded Prescription Drug Fee Regulations in 26 C.F.R. Part 51, which were published on August 18, 2011 (76 FR 51245), provide the method by which each covered entity’s annual fee is calculated. These regulations also define terms for the administration of the fee. As relevant for this notice, § 51.2T(g) defines fee year as the calendar year in which the fee for a particular sales year must be paid and § 51.2T(m) defines sales year as the second calendar year preceding the fee year.
Section 51.3T provides that annually, each covered entity may submit a completed Form 8947, “ Report of Branded Prescription Drug Information,” in accordance with the instructions for the form.
amending the temporary regulations to apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, while permitting taxpayers to apply the temporary regulations for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and before the applicability date of the final regulations.
BACKGROUND
On March 10, 2008, the Service and the Treasury Department issued proposed regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property (2008 proposed regulations) in the Federal Reg- ister (REG–168745–03, 73 Fed. Reg. 12838–01 [2008–18 I.R.B. 871]). The Service and the Treasury Department received numerous written comments on the 2008 proposed regulations and held a public hearing on June 24, 2008.
On December 27, 2011, after considering the written comments and the statements at the public hearing, the Service and the Treasury Department published temporary regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property in the Federal Register (T.D. 9564). The Service and the Treasury Department also withdrew the 2008 proposed regulations and published proposed regulations (REG–168745–03, 76 FR 81128–01 [2012–14 I.R.B. 718]) (the 2011 proposed regulations), which cross-referenced the text of the temporary regulations. The temporary regulations generally apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.
The Service and the Treasury Department received numerous written comments on the 2011 proposed regulations and held a public hearing on May 9, 2012. The Service and the Treasury Department are considering the written comments received as well as the statements from the public hearing.
DISCUSSION
In 2013, the Service and the Treasury Department expect to publish final regulations on the tax treatment of amounts paid to acquire, produce, or improve tangible property under sections 162 and 263(a), and on the accounting for, and disposition of, property subject to section 168. The Service and the Treasury Department expect the final regulations to apply to tax
able years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, and to permit taxpayers to apply the provisions of the final regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012. Recognizing that taxpayers are expending resources to comply with the temporary regulations, the Service and the Treasury Department are notifying taxpayers that certain sections of the temporary regulations, including the sections listed below, may be revised in a manner that might affect, and in certain cases simplify, taxpayers’ implementation of the rules when the regulations are issued in final form.
• De Minimis Rule: § 1.263(a)–2T(g); • Dispositions: §§ 1.168(i)–1T and¶
• Safe Harbor for Routine Maintenance:¶
§ 1.263(a)–3T(g).
The revisions being contemplated by the Service and the Treasury Department take into consideration all comments received, including comments requesting relief for small businesses.
Shortly after publication of this notice, the Service and the Treasury Department will publish in the Federal Register a Treasury Decision amending the temporary regulations to apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, while permitting taxpayers to choose to apply the temporary regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and before the applicability date of the final regulations.
Taxpayers choosing to apply the provisions of the temporary regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and before the applicability date of the final regulations may continue to obtain the automatic consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to change their methods of accounting under Revenue Procedures 2012–19, 2012–14 I.R.B. 689, and 2012–20, 2012–14 I.R.B. 700. For taxpayers choosing to apply the provisions of the final regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, the Service and the Treasury Department expect to publish procedures for obtaining automatic consent to change a method of accounting when the final regulations are published.
2012–51 I.R.B. 714 December 17, 2012
& Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Celia Gabrysh at (202) 622–3130 (not a toll-free call).
Application of the General Welfare Exclusion to Indian Tribal Government Programs That Provide Benefits to Tribal Members
Notice 2012–75
PURPOSE
This notice proposes a revenue procedure that would describe general principles for the general welfare exclusion and provide safe harbors under which the Internal Revenue Service would presume that the individual need requirement of the general welfare exclusion is met for benefits provided under Indian tribal governmental programs described in sections 5.02 and 5.03 of the proposed revenue procedure, and would not assert that benefits provided under programs described in section 5.03 represent compensation for services. The proposed revenue procedure provides certainty that the value of the benefits described will be excluded from gross income under the general welfare exclusion, but does not limit the applicability to Indian tribes of existing guidance holding that certain benefits are excluded from gross income under the general welfare exclusion.
Under the general welfare exclusion, the Service has consistently concluded that certain payments made to or on behalf of individuals by governmental units under legislatively provided social benefit programs for the promotion of the general welfare are not included in a recipient’s gross income. Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, representatives of the Service and the Treasury Department consulted with tribal leaders and members of Indian tribes concerning the application of the general welfare exclusion to programs of Indian tribal governments. In Notice 2011–94, 2011–49 I.R.B. 834, the Service invited comments concerning the application of the general welfare exclusion to Indian tribal government programs that provide benefits to tribal members.
Generally, the form solicits information from covered entities on National Drug Codes, orphan drugs, designated entities, rebates, and other information specified by the form or its instructions. The form is to be filed by the date prescribed in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Section 51.6T provides that for each sales year the IRS will make a preliminary fee calculation for each covered entity and will notify each covered entity of this calculation by the date prescribed in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. This notification will also include additional prescribed information. As used in this notice, “notice of preliminary fee calculation” includes the additional prescribed information.
Section 51.7T provides that upon receipt of its preliminary fee calculation, each covered entity will have an opportunity to dispute this calculation by submitting to the IRS an error report with prescribed information. Sections 51.7T(b) and (c) set out the information that a covered entity must submit to support each asserted error. Section 51.7T(d) provides that each covered entity must submit its error report(s) in the form and manner that is prescribed in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. This guidance will also prescribe the date by which each covered entity must submit its report(s).
Section 51.8T provides that the IRS will send each covered entity its final fee calculation no later than August 31 st of each fee year and also provides that covered entities must pay their fee by September 30 th of the fee year.
Submission of Form 8947
For the 2013 fee year, a covered entity that chooses to submit Form 8947 must file the form by December 17, 2012.
Time and manner for notifying covered entities of their preliminary fee calculation
For the 2013 fee year, the IRS will mail each covered entity a paper notice of its preliminary fee calculation by April 1, 2013. This mailing will include a National Drug Code (NDC) attachment (NDC attachment) that lists the covered entity’s NDCs and the sales data reported to the IRS by each government program pursuant to § 51.4T.
A covered entity may request that the IRS send a CD-ROM with the NDC attachment in Microsoft Excel format. The covered entity must make this request by March 15, 2013. This request must be made either by telephone to Ingrid Taylor at (908) 301–2118 or Mi Lim at (312) 292–3775 (not toll-free calls) or by email to it.bpd.fee@irs.gov . If a covered entity makes this request timely, the IRS will mail the covered entity its notice of preliminary fee calculation on paper and the NDC attachment on paper and CD-ROM by April 1, 2013.
Time and manner for submitting error reports for the dispute resolution process
For the 2013 fee year, a covered entity that chooses to submit an error report regarding its preliminary fee calculation must mail the error report by May 16, 2013. When the IRS mails each covered entity a notice of its preliminary fee calculation by April 1, 2013, the IRS will also send each covered entity a template on a CD-ROM that the covered entity must use to prepare its error report. All completed templates and the supporting documentation must be submitted on a CD-ROM and sent by mail to:
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service — Branded
Prescription Drug Fee 1973 N. Rulon White Boulevard, Mail Stop 4916 Ogden, UT 84404
Notification of Final Fee Calculation
In accordance with § 51.8T(a), the IRS will notify each covered entity of its final fee calculation for 2013 by August 31, 2013. In accordance with § 51.8T(c), each covered entity must pay this fee by September 30, 2013.
Effect on Other Documents
Notice 2011–92, 2011–48 I.R.B. 809, which provides guidance for the 2012 fee year, is obsoleted.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this notice is Celia Gabrysh of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs
December 17, 2012 715 2012–51 I.R.B.
programs are included within the broad definition of gross income under § 61 unless an exclusion applies. See Notice 2003–18, 2003–1 C.B. 699; Rev. Rul. 79–356, 1979–2 C.B. 28. The Service has consistently concluded, however, that certain payments made to or on behalf of individuals by governmental units under legislatively provided social benefit programs for the promotion of the general welfare are not included in a recipient’s gross income (general welfare exclusion). See, for example, Rev. Rul. 98–19, 1998–1 C.B. 840 (relocation payment authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act and made by a local jurisdiction to an individual moving from a flood-damaged residence to another residence is not includible in the individual’s gross income); Rev. Rul. 74–205, 1974–1 C.B. 20 (replacement housing payments to aid individuals displaced from their homes in acquiring decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings of modest standards are not includible in gross income).
To qualify under the general welfare exclusion, the payments must (1) be made pursuant to a governmental program, (2) be for the promotion of the general welfare (that is, based on need), and (3) not represent compensation for services. Rev. Rul. 2005–46, 2005–2 C.B. 120; Rev. Rul. 82–106, 1982–1 C.B. 16; Rev. Rul. 75–246, 1975–1 C.B. 24. Thus, the general welfare exclusion applies if “the grant
[is] received under a program requiring the individual recipient to establish need. [Internal citations omitted.] Grants received under social welfare programs that [do] not require recipients to establish individual need” do not qualify under the general welfare exclusion. Bailey v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 1293, 1300 (1987), acq., 1989–2 C.B. 1.
Whether a payment qualifies under the general welfare exclusion is determined under the federal income tax laws (including provisions not in the Internal Revenue Code), not under the laws of state, local, sovereign tribal, or foreign governments, or other federal laws. Thus, an incentive payment that a United States citizen received from the City of Berlin, Germany under a program to encourage spending and consumption was not excludable from the recipient’s gross income simply because it was a program of a sovereign government when the program did not meet
The Service received over 85 comments from Indian tribal governments and other individuals and groups describing various Indian tribal government programs for tribal members and how the general welfare exclusion should apply to those programs.
The proposed revenue procedure responds to the issues addressed in the written comments and discussed as part of the consultation process, including the requirement under the general welfare exclusion to establish individual need. Under the proposed revenue procedure, the Service would conclusively presume that the individual need requirement is met for each tribal member, spouse, or dependent receiving a benefit under the housing programs, educational programs, elder and disabled programs, other qualifying assistance programs, and cultural and religious programs described in sections 5.02 and 5.03 of the proposed revenue procedure. For tribal members receiving a benefit described in section 5.03, the Service also would conclusively presume that the benefit does not represent compensation for services.
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, the Service and Treasury Department are issuing this proposed revenue procedure to allow Indian tribes to review the guidance and provide comments prior to the issuance of final guidance.
Accordingly, the Service and Treasury Department request comments on the proposed revenue procedure. Comments may be submitted in writing on or before June 4, 2013. Comments should be submitted to Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2012–75), Room 5203, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044, or electronically to Notice.Comments@irscounsel.treas.gov . Please include “Notice 2012–75” in the subject line of any electronic communications. Alternatively, comments may be hand delivered between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday to CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2012–75), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. All comments will be available for public inspection and copying.
Although the revenue procedure is in proposed form, until additional guidance is published taxpayers may apply the pro
posed revenue procedure in taxable years for which the period of limitation on refund or credit under § 6511 has not expired.
PROPOSED REVENUE PROCEDURE
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code