Skip to content

Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service After Notice and an…

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2007-45 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 10, after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding before an adminis

trative law judge, the following individuals have been disbarred from practice before the Internal Revenue Service :

Name Address Designation Effective Date

Ruocchio, Robert Havertown, PA CPA June 11, 2007

Turner, John S. Paradise, CA Enrolled Agent June 15, 2007

Johnson, Ted R. Frankfort, IN Attorney July 30, 2007

Ayers, Dani D. Kelseyville, CA Enrolled Agent August 6, 2007

Gregory and Vickie Iverson

Charitable Supporting Organization Salt Lake City, UT The Scott Canepa Charitable

Supporting Organization Las Vegas, NV Kyle Charitable Support

Organization Trust Austin, TX Paul and Deborah Marvin

Charitable Supporting Foundation Salt Lake City, UT Malecha Family Foundation

Apple Valley, MN Shared Visions Foundation

Park City, UT Harold B Lee Foundation

Woodland, UT Missouri Basketball Club

Columbia, MO Mahisekar Charitable

Supporting Organization Orland Park, IL Georgetown Title Foundation

Sandy, UT

Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations Contributions to Which are Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code

Announcement 2007–105

The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination that the organizations listed below qualify as organizations described in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Generally, the Service will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the Service is not precluded from disallowing a deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely

filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.

If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on November 5, 2007, and would end on the date the court first determines that the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the organization that were the basis for revocation.

2007–45 I.R.B. 984 November 5, 2007

Access Home Project, Inc.

Los Angeles, CA To Life Foundation

New York, NY Miami Latin Film Festival

Miami, FL Larry and Kelli Cotton Charitable

Supporting Organization Fort Worth, TX

Buddy & Rita Gregory Charitable

Supporting Organization Lehi, UT Keith & Anna Barton Charitable

Supporting Organization Lehi, UT Asafo Global Trust Fund, Inc.

Phoenix, AZ

White Wing Educational Dev Corp

New York, NY AARO Credit Services

Costa Mesa, CA Paul and Deborah Manning

Charitable Supporting Org Salt Lake City, UT MOP Non-Profit, Inc.

Sterling Heights, MI

November 5, 2007 985 2007–45 I.R.B.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2007-45

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.