Introduction›Rev. Proc. 96-3, page 82.
SEC. 8. UNDER WHAT
Internal Revenue Bulletin 1996-1 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
CIRCUMSTANCES DOES THE SERVICE HAVE DISCRETION TO ISSUE LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS?
Ordinarily not in certain areas because of factual nature of the problem
Not on alternative plans or hypothetical situations
Ordinarily not on part of an integrated transaction
.01 The Service ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling or determination letter in certain areas because of the factual nature of the problem involved or because of other reasons. The Service may decline to issue a letter ruling or a determination letter when appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration or on other grounds whenever warranted by the facts or circumstances of a particular case.
Instead of issuing a letter ruling or determination letter, the national office or a key district director may, when it is considered appropriate and in the best interests of the Service, issue an information letter calling attention to well-established principles of tax law.
.02 A letter ruling or a determination letter will not be issued on alternative plans of proposed transactions or on hypothetical situations.
.03 The national office ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling on only part of an integrated transaction.
Law requires ruling letter .04 The national office will issue rulings on prospective or future transactions if the law or regulations require a determination of the effect of a proposed transaction for tax purposes.
Issues under consideration by PBGC or DOL
.05 A ruling or determination letter relating to an issue that is being considered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) or the Department of Labor (DOL), and involves the same taxpayer, shall be issued at the discretion of the Service.
Cafeteria plans .06 The Service does not issue ruling letters or determination letters on whether a cafeteria plan satisfies the requirements of § 125 of the Code. See also Rev. Proc. 96– 3, also in this Bulletin, for areas under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Domestic) involving cafeteria plans in which advance rulings or determination letters will not be issued.
Determination letters .07 See section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 96–6 for employee plans matters on which determination letters will not be issued.
Domicile in a foreign jurisdiction .08
105
(1) The Service is ordinarily unwilling to rule in situations where a taxpayer or a related party is domiciled or organized in a foreign jurisdiction with which the United States does not have an effective mechanism for obtaining tax information with respect to civil tax examinations and criminal investigations, which would preclude the Service from obtaining information located in such jurisdiction that is relevant to the analysis or examination of the tax issues involved in the ruling request.
(2) The provisions of subsection 8.08(1) above shall not apply if the taxpayer or affected related party (a) consents to the disclosure of all relevant information requested by the Service in processing the ruling request or in the course of an examination to verify the accuracy of the representations made and to otherwise analyze or examine the tax issues involved in the ruling request, and (b) waives all claims to protection of bank or commercial secrecy laws in the foreign jurisdiction with respect to the information requested by the Service. In the event the taxpayer’s or related party’s consent to disclose relevant information or to waive protection of bank or commercial secrecy is determined by the Service to be ineffective or of no force and effect, then the Service may retroactively rescind any ruling rendered in reliance on such consent.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code