Chapter 25.07 — EXCEPTIONS
Santa Barbara Municipal Code · 2026-07 edition · updated 2026-09-27 · Santa Barbara
§ 25.07.010. Purpose.¶
This Chapter establishes procedures for allowing minor deviations from certain standards for specific situations because of the prescriptive nature of the standards and as allowed by State law. Depending on the unique characteristics and dimensions on an individual parcel, it is possible that the full development potential of the zone may not be achievable even after applying the allowed exceptions in this Chapter. (Ord. 6170, 2/25/2025)
§ 25.07.020. Exceptions to Standards.¶
A. Applicability. This Section applies to all development proposed under the ODDS. The Review Authority is allowed to grant exceptions for only the standards identified in this section.
Exceptions are applied separately for design sites with 10 percent or less slope and with over 10 percent average slope. Average slope for a lot is calculated using the methodology in Section 30.15.030 (Determining Average Slope).
(a) Lots with an averages slope of 10 percent or less may request an exception in Table 25.07.020.A (Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average Slope).
(b) Lots with an average slope over 10 percent may request an exception in Table 25.07.020.B (Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope).
B. Review Authority. The Review Authority for exception requests shall be the Community Development Director, except for standards which affect visibility at driveways and intersections, or standards in the right-of-way shall be reviewed by the Public Works Director.
C. Application Requirements. Exception requests shall be reviewed and processed as follows:
If the development for which an exception is requested is being processed consistent with this chapter, the review procedure shall be the same as for the main project application.
Exception requests shall be accompanied from a written request by the applicant explaining the need for the exception and identifying all existing site conditions or features that prevent compliance with the specific standard.
Granting of an exception does not eliminate other standards not specified in Table 25.07.020.A (Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average Slope) or Table 25.07.020.B (Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope).
D. Findings. For the Review Authority to grant an exception, findings for the exception in Table 25.07.020.A (Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average
Slope) or Table 25.07.020.B (Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope) are required.
E. Existing Site Condition. An existing site condition is a legally permitted building or structure constructed on the site with a final inspection or certificate of occupancy, or a natural feature that exists as of the date of initial application submittal.
For purposes of this chapter, existing site conditions that prevent compliance with a standard include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) A mature tree with at least one trunk measuring four inches in diameter or greater at four feet six inches above grade in height and not planned for removal or alteration with a permit per Chapter 15.24 (Preservation of Trees).
(b) Utility infrastructure that is not required to be removed, relocated, or undergrounded per Section 22.38.030 (Service Connection Requirements).
(c) A structure, site, cultural landscape, or feature designated or eligible to be designated historically significant based on the criteria in Section 30.157.025 (Significance Criteria).
(d) Retaining wall necessary to retain or support soil.
(e) A watercourse identified on City of Santa Barbara Map Analysis and Printing System or any other map as may be adopted or established by ordinance.
- The existing site condition used as a basis for requesting an exception shall not be removed or altered in their footprint.
Table 25.07.020.A: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average Slope Findings/Criteria (All that Allowed Administrative Administrative Relief Type Apply) Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard 1. Design Site Dimensions a. Depth or Width i. Existing site conditions 12" or 10% of the Chapter 25.02 (Zones), Decrease in the prevent compliance standard, whichever is Subsection B (Building minimum required with the design site greater. Types and Design Site dimension standards. Size) of the Zone ii. A non-rectangular parcel shape results in less than the required depth or width for a design site, preventing compliance with the standard. iii. Dimensions of the existing lot, subdivided prior to January 1, 2025, do not meet the minimum requirements for any building type allowed in Subsection B of the Zone.
| Table 25.07.020.A: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average Slope | |
|---|---|
| Administrative Relief Type | Findings/ Apply) Allowed Administrative Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard |
| 2. Building Setbacks |
|
| a. Front or Interior Increase or decrease in the minimum or maximum required setback for a main building or wing |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the front setback standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater. Chapter 25.02 (Zones), Subsection D (Building Placement) of the Zone ii. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the interior setback standard. |
| b. Façade within Façade Zone Reduce the minimum amount of façade required within or abutting the Façade Zone |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the Façade Zone standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater. The horizontal unbuilt area resulting from this exception is landscaped per the standards in Section 25.03.050 (Landscape). Chapter 25.02 (Zones), Subsection D (Building Placement) of the Zone |
| 3. Open Yard |
|
| a. Width and Depth Reduce minimum width or depth dimensions |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the open yard dimensions standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater, without reducing minimum area required. Chapter 25.04 (Building Types), Subsection F (Open Yard) of the Building Type i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the open yard area standard. Up to 10% of the standard. |
| b. Area Reduce minimum area |
|
| 4. Building Footprint |
|
| a. Size of Main Body or Wing Increase in the maximum width or length |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the building footprint standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater; The wing is one story less in height than the main body; and The building complies with the setbacks of the zone or as allowed to be adjusted by this section. Chapter 25.04 (Building Types), Subsection C (Building Size and Massing) of the Building Type |
| 5. Parking Standards |
|
| a. Primary and Secondary Front Setback Reduce the required parking setback |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the parking setback standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater; The driveway is in compliance with the zone standards; and Chapter 25.02 (Zones), Subsection E (Parking) of the Zone |
| Table 25.07.020.A: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average Slope | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Findings/ |
Allowed Administrative | ||||
| Administrative Relief Type | Apply) | Relief and Conditions | Reference to Standard | ||
| The ground floor space | |||||
| remains occupiable in | |||||
| compliance with the | |||||
| zone standards, as | |||||
| allowed to be adjusted | |||||
| by this section; and | |||||
| The setback reduction | |||||
| maintains visibility at | |||||
| driveways and | |||||
| intersections, and does | |||||
| not affect standards for | |||||
| the right-of-way. | |||||
| b. | Primary Front | i. | Existing site conditions | Vehicular access; from | Chapter 25.02 (Zones), |
| Vehicle Access | prevent compliance | the primary front; | Subsection E (Parking) | ||
| Allow vehicle access | with the vehicle access | The driveway is in | of the Zone | ||
| from primary front on | standard. | compliance with the | |||
| corner design sites | zone standards; and | ||||
| The ground floor space | |||||
| remains occupiable in | |||||
| compliance with the | |||||
| zone standards, as | |||||
| allowed to be adjusted | |||||
| by this section; and | |||||
| The existing lot is at | |||||
| least 50' wide; and | |||||
| The proposed driveway | |||||
| is not aligned with any | |||||
| driveway on the opposite | |||||
| side of the street | |||||
| c. | Alley Access | i. | The alley does not meet | Vehicular access from | Section 25.03.100 |
| Allow vehicle access | vehicle access | primary or secondary | (Parking Techniques) | ||
| from primary or | requirements. | front. | |||
| secondary front when | |||||
| alley access exists. | |||||
| 6. | Landscape | ||||
| a. | Front Setback Shade | i. | A certified arborist | No shade tree required. | Section 25.03.050 |
| Tree | report identifies site | (Landscape) | |||
| Minimum required in | conditions that prevent | ||||
| NM zone | compliance with the | ||||
| standard. | |||||
| 7. | Screening |
| Table 25.07.020.A: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with 10% or Less Average Slope | |
|---|---|
| Administrative Relief Type | Findings/ Apply) Allowed Administrative Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard |
| a. Roof-Mounted Equipment Screening Height Decrease the minimum height of the architectural element screening the roof- mounted mechanical equipment |
i. Height of architectural element used for screening results in exceeding maximum height limit of the building. Up to 10% lower than the object being screened. The roof-mounted equipment being screened is not publicly visible. Section 25.03.080 (Screening) |
| b. Freestanding Equipment Location Reduce minimum required setback |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the front setback standard. 12" or 10% of standard, whichever is greater. Section 25.03.080 (Screening) ii. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the interior setback standard |
| 8. Block Size |
|
| a. Block Dimensions Allow larger blocks |
i. Preservation of existing building or buildings within the boundaries of a Sustainable Neighborhood Plan prevents compliance with the standard. Maximum block length and perimeter standards to be increased to encompass the building and all setbacks required by the applicable zone. Section 25.03.160C.3 (Block and Street Standards) |
| 9. Building Type |
|
| a. Stories Allow additional story |
i. The existing site conditions or development standards of Chapter 25.04 (Building Types) prevent compliance with the minimum unit quantity required (Section 25.02.030D.1 (Minimum Unit Quantities)). One additional story, not to exceed 4 stories or the maximum height allowed in the zone, for the Side Court, Medium Courtyard, and Large Multiplex Building Types. Chapter 25.04 (Building Types) Subsection C (Building Size and Massing) of the Side Court (Section 25.04.100), Medium Courtyard (Section 25.04.110), or Large Multiplex (Section 25.04.120) |
| Table 25.07.020.B: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope | |
|---|---|
| Administrative Relief Type Additional Findings/ Criteria (All that Apply) Allowed Administrative Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard |
|
| 1. Design Site Dimensions |
|
| a. Depth Decrease in minimum design site depth |
i. Existing average slope exceeds 15%. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater. Chapter 25.02 (Zones) Subsection B (Building Types and Design Site Size) of the Zone |
| 2. Building Setbacks |
|
| a. Front and Interior Increase or decrease in the minimum or maximum required setback for a main building or wing |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the front setback standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater. Chapter 25.02 (Zones), Subsection D (Building Placement) of the Zone ii. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the interior setback standard. i. Front 50' of the design site exceeds 20% slope. Front setback reduced to 10' min. The Façade Zone is not reduced. ii. Front 25' of the design site exceeds 20% slope. Front setback reduced to 5' min. The Façade Zone is not reduced. |
| b. Front Decrease in minimum to maximum required setback areas for main building or wing |
|
| 3. Open Yard |
|
| a. Width and Depth Reduce minimum width or depth |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the open yard dimension standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater, without reducing minimum area required. Chapter 25.04 (Building Types) Subsection F (Open Yard) of the Building Type i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the open yard area standard. Up to 10% of the standard. |
| b. Area Reduce minimum area |
|
| 4. Parking Standards |
|
| a. Primary and Secondary Front Setback Reduce the required parking setback |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the parking setback standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater; The driveway is in compliance with the zone standards; and Chapter 25.02 (Zones) Subsection E (Parking) of the Zone |
| Table 25.07.020.B: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope | |
|---|---|
| Administrative Relief Type |
Additional Findings/ Criteria (All that Apply) Allowed Administrative Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard |
| The ground floor space remains occupiable in compliance with the zone standards, as allowed to be adjusted by this section; and The setback reduction maintains visibility at driveways and intersections, and does not affect standards for the right-of-way. ii. The front 50' of parcel exceeds 20% slope. Required parking is allowed to be located between the right-of- way and the building: a. 20' parking setback if street facing, 10' parking setback for non-street facing. b. Max 50% of primary or secondary front lot width. The driveway is in compliance with the zone standards; and The ground floor space is between the street and the parking, remains occupiable, and is at least 15' deep. |
|
| b. Primary Front Vehicle Access Allow vehicle access from primary front on corner design sites |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the vehicle access standard. Vehicular access from the primary front; The driveway is in compliance with the zone standards; and Chapter 25.02 (Zones), Subsection E (Parking) of the Zone |
| The ground floor space remains occupiable in compliance with the zone standards, as allowed to be adjusted by this section; and The existing lot is at least 50' wide; and |
| Table 25.07.020.B: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope | |
|---|---|
| Administrative Relief Type |
Additional Findings/ Criteria (All that Apply) Allowed Administrative Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard |
| The proposed driveway is not aligned with any driveway on the opposite side of the street; and The design site average slope along the secondary front exceeds 15%. |
|
| 5. Site Grading |
|
| a. Retaining Wall Height Increase in maximum retaining wall height or length |
i. Existing slopes average 20% slope. Increase in retaining wall height up to 10' along interior design site line. Increase in retaining wall height up to 12' within the building footprint if over all building height in compliance with zone standards; Section 25.03.120 (Retaining Walls) ii. The retaining wall is necessary to accommodate the building and required site access and parking. |
| The retaining wall or series of retaining walls are not visible from the adjacent public sidewalk or abutting lots; and Retaining walls not within the building footprint are less than 50' in total length along the interior design site line opposite the primary front or any one design site line; and The retaining wall is the result of excavation (cut). |
|
| 6. Landscape |
|
| a. Front Setback Shade Tree Minimum required in NM zone |
i. A certified arborist report identifies site conditions that prevent compliance with the standard. No shade tree required. Section 25.03.050 (Landscape) |
| Table 25.07.020.B: Exceptions to Standards for Design Sites with Over 10% Average Slope | |
|---|---|
| Administrative Relief Type |
Additional Findings/ Criteria (All that Apply) Allowed Administrative Relief and Conditions Reference to Standard |
| 7. Screening |
|
| a. Roof-Mounted Equipment Screening Height Decrease the minimum height of the architectural element screening the roof-mounted mechanical equipment |
i. Height of architectural element used for screening results in exceeding maximum height limit of the building Up to 10% lower than the object being screened. The roof-mounted equipment being screened is not publicly visible. Section 25.03.080 (Screening) |
| b. Freestanding Equipment Location Reduce minimum required setback |
i. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the front setback standard. 12" or 10% of the standard, whichever is greater. Section 25.03.080 (Screening) ii. Existing site conditions prevent compliance with the interior setback standard. |
| 8. Building Type |
|
| a. Stories Allow an additional story |
i. The existing site conditions or development standards of Chapter 25.04 (Building Types) prevent compliance with the minimum unit quantity required (Section 25.02.030D.1 (Minimum Unit Quantities)). One additional story, not to exceed 4 stories or the maximum height allowed in the zone, for the Side Court, Medium Courtyard, or Large Multiplex Building Type. Subsection C (Building Size and Massing) of the Side Court (Section 25.04.100), Medium Courtyard (Section 25.04.110), or Large Multiplex (Section 25.04.120) |
(Ord. 6170, 2/25/2025)
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code