Local zoning · Paramount

Paramount — Historic Preservation

Q: What does Title 17 say about historic properties and objective design standards in Paramount?

Title 17 explicitly excludes historic properties from the City's objective residential design standards; see § 17.12.080 and § 17.16.120 for the exemption language and applicability. § 17.12.080 § 17.16.120

Q: Do I need Residential Review Board approval to alter a historic single‑family house?

If the property is in R‑1, R‑2, or R‑M , the Residential Review Board must review building‑permit applications and make the findings in § 17.68.040 before issuance; that applies to projects in those residential zones even where objective standards are exempt. § 17.68.030

Q: If I add an ADU to a historic house, will I have to provide parking?

The ADU chapter states the City will not require parking for an ADU located within “an architecturally and historically significant historic district,” as listed in § 17.104.160(A)(2) . You must verify whether your property is actually inside such a formally recognized historic district. § 17.104.160

Q: If my property is in a planned development (PD‑PS), how does that affect historic review?

Where a PD‑PS applies the PD ordinance controls development standards for that specific area ( § 17.72.010 ). Any historic‑project review must follow the specific PD ordinance and Title 17 cross-references — check the PD ordinance text to see whether it contains preservation provisions. § 17.72.010

Historic Preservation under the Paramount local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.

Ask a question free See coverage

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026

Overview

This page summarizes what is contained in the City of Paramount's zoning code (Title 17) about historic preservation, how historically important properties are treated in Major zoning districts, and the local review pathways that most directly affect historic homes and districts. The Municipal Code does not contain a standalone "historic preservation" chapter or a local landmark designation procedure in the retrieved materials; instead, historic properties are handled via exemptions and administrative/review procedures scattered through Title 17. See the detailed citations below for the controlling code sections and for what the code does not say. § 17.04.030

What the Code actually says (key rules, with code grounding)

Objective-design standards exemption for historic properties. The City's objective residential design standards explicitly do not apply to historic properties; the exemption is stated in the objective-standards provisions. See § 17.12.080 and § 17.16.120 for the rule and applicability (historic properties are exempt from those objective design standards) § 17.12.080 § 17.16.120 .
Residential architectural/plan review (Residential Review Board). For building permits in the residential zones R-1, R-2, and R-M, the Residential Review Board reviews applications to determine whether the proposed work is consistent with neighborhood character (setbacks, height, parking, walls, landscaping, gross floor area, etc.). The Board must make specific findings before approval (§ 17.68.030 — § 17.68.040), and its decisions are appealable to the Planning Commission and City Council (§ 17.68.050) § 17.68.030 § 17.68.040 § 17.68.050 .
ADU parking exception when in a historic district. The ADU chapter provides that the City will not require parking for an ADU when the property is located “within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.” That explicit ADU parking exception is in § 17.104.160(A)(2) § 17.104.160 .
General zoning framework (which districts matter). Title 17 establishes the City's zone categories—R-1, R-2, R-M, C-3, C-M, M-1, M-2, and PD-PS—and the general purpose statement for the title (classification of uses and development standards) § 17.04.030 § 17.04.020 .
Site-planning, parking, and design rules remain relevant to historic projects. Although historic properties are exempt from certain objective standards, Title 17 still requires development plans, parking plans, landscaping, and attention to building placement in many chapters (see § 17.16.125 for site plan content and parking requirements for multi-family, and other chapters for parking and development standards) § 17.16.125 .
What the code does NOT provide in the retrieved materials. There is no clearly identifiable local landmark designation process, no mapped local historic overlay district procedure presented in the retrieved Title 17 excerpts, and no "certificate of appropriateness" or demolition-review procedure found in the provided files. Where those programs are important to preservation they are commonly in a separate Historic Preservation chapter or municipal code chapter — Not found in retrieved materials.

District-by-district breakdown (purpose, typical uses, historic‑project implications)

Note: the City’s zoning classifications are listed in § 17.04.030; where a district's numeric development standards appear in Title 17 excerpts those are cited; where a district‑specific historic rule is not in the retrieved materials the entry says so and recommends verification. § 17.04.030

R-1 (Single‑family residential)

Purpose / typical permitted uses: single‑family dwellings and accessory uses as described in Title 17; R‑1 is the single‑family residential classification. § 17.04.030
Historic-property implications: Projects on historic properties in R-1 are exempt from the City's objective design standards per § 17.12.080 / § 17.16.120, but the Residential Review Board reviews building-permit applications in R-1 and must find that the proposal will not be detrimental to zone character (§ 17.68.030 — § 17.68.040) § 17.12.080 § 17.68.030 .
Key dimensional standards (from Title 17 excerpts): Specific front/side/rear yard and height tables for R‑1 are scattered in Title 17; where a particular numeric standard is needed for an application, verify by referencing the applicable zone table or the City's zoning map (not reproduced here). Not found in the retrieved snippets — verify with the jurisdiction.

R-2 (Medium‑density residential)

Purpose / typical uses: two‑family / medium-density residential uses; multi‑unit where allowed. § 17.04.030
Historic-property implications: Same treatment as R‑1: historic properties are outside the objective-standards matrix; building permits in R‑2 are subject to Residential Review Board findings before issuance (§ 17.68.030) § 17.16.120 § 17.68.030 .
Key dimensional standards: Maximum height in R‑2 = 25 feet is stated in § 17.12.070(A) (example numeric standard available in Title 17) § 17.12.070 .

R‑M (Multiple‑family residential)

Purpose / typical uses: multifamily residential developments; mixed residential density where allowed. § 17.04.030
Historic-property implications: The Residential Review Board has jurisdiction over projects in R‑M and will examine architectural compatibility; objective standards exemptions for historic properties apply (see § 17.16.125 and § 17.16.120) § 17.68.030 § 17.16.125 .
Key standards: Parking minimums for R‑M are stated in § 17.16.125 (two covered spaces per unit plus guest parking rules), which a historic rehabilitation project must address unless another exemption applies § 17.16.125 .

C‑3 (General commercial) and C‑M (Commercial‑manufacturing)

Purpose / typical uses: Commercial and retail uses (C‑3), and mixed commercial/manufacturing in C‑M; see lists of conditional and permitted uses in the code. § 17.04.030
Historic-property implications: The Title 17 excerpts do not present a commercial-specific historic preservation process or designation; no local commercial historic‑district rules were identified in the retrieved materials. Not found in retrieved materials — verify with the jurisdiction.

M‑1 (Light manufacturing) and M‑2 (Heavy manufacturing)

Purpose / typical uses: Industrial/manufacturing uses; Title 17 contains specific nonconforming and operational limitations in these zones. § 17.04.030
Historic-property implications: No industry‑zone historic process identified in the retrieved files; historic‑property exemptions for objective residential design standards are not relevant here. Not found in retrieved materials — verify with the jurisdiction.

PD‑PS (Planned Development — Performance Standards)

Purpose / typical uses: Customized development regulations set by specific-plan ordinance; the PD‑PS ordinance supersedes differing provisions of Title 17 for the area it covers. § 17.72.010 explains the PD‑PS concept § 17.72.010 .
Historic‑project implications: Where a PD is in place, the PD ordinance governs standards; check the PD ordinance text for any preservation language. Not found in retrieved materials for historic-specific PD provisions — verify with the specific PD ordinance.

Decision‑relevant standards (quick table)

Topic	What matters for historic projects	Code reference
Objective-design standards exemption	Historic properties are excluded from the City's objective residential design standards (so discretionary review/other standards may control)	§ 17.12.080 and § 17.16.120
Residential review jurisdiction	Residential Review Board reviews building permits within R-1, R-2, R‑M and must make findings on neighborhood character (setbacks, height, parking, walls, landscaping)	§ 17.68.030 / § 17.68.040
Appeals	Decisions of the Residential Review Board may be appealed to the Planning Commission and City Council	§ 17.68.050
ADU parking exemption for historic districts	City will not require ADU parking where located in “an architecturally and historically significant historic district”	§ 17.104.160(A)(2)
Site-plan and parking requirements	Development plans must include parking, landscaping, and other site details; R‑M parking minimums and design dimensions are specified in the site-plan standards	§ 17.16.125

Practical guidance / synthesis (plain‑English interpretation)

If your house is in R‑1, R‑2, or R‑M and the property is considered historic, expect the City to treat your project differently than a standard objective-design project: the objective (ministerial) standards do not automatically apply (§ 17.12.080 / § 17.16.120), and instead the Residential Review Board will look at compatibility and neighborhood character and make findings before a building permit is issued (§ 17.68.030—§ 17.68.040). § 17.12.080 § 17.68.030
For ADUs, there is an explicit local parking exemption if the ADU is inside an "architecturally and historically significant historic district" — this is a narrowly worded exception in the ADU chapter, so confirm whether a formal historic district exists in the City before assuming the exemption applies (§ 17.104.160) § 17.104.160 .
The Municipal Code does not show a local process to formally designate landmarks or an explicit demolition-review program in the provided excerpts. Don’t assume the City has a local landmark register or a Certificate of Appropriateness process unless you confirm with Planning — those items are Not found in retrieved materials.
Always verify district‑specific numeric standards (setbacks, lot coverage, exact permitted uses) against the zone tables and the City’s zoning map — excerpts here give examples (e.g., R‑2 maximum height 25 ft in § 17.12.070) but not a full, parcel‑level rule set § 17.12.070 .

Checklist (what an applicant for work on a historic property should prepare)

Confirm zone of the parcel (R-1, R-2, R-M, etc.) from the City zoning map and note any PD‑PS overlays. § 17.04.030
Prepare a full site plan showing parking, setbacks, walls/fences, exterior elevations and materials, landscaping and irrigation per § 17.16.125.
Determine whether your property is within an “architecturally and historically significant historic district” (ADU parking exception) — contact Planning to confirm. § 17.104.160
If in R‑1, R‑2, or R‑M, be ready for Residential Review Board review and the findings required by § 17.68.040 (neighborhood compatibility: setbacks, height, parking, landscaping, etc.).
If a decision is adverse, note appeal timelines (10 days for RRB appeals to Planning Commission) per § 17.68.050.
If you need a formal statement of historic status (e.g., to qualify for an exemption), ask the Planning Department which local or state list (if any) the City recognizes — local designation procedure not found in retrieved materials. Not found in retrieved materials.

Risks & Ambiguities

Issue	Why it matters	What to verify
No local landmark designation language found	Without a local designation process, “historic” status used in exemptions may be unclear or administered case-by-case	Verify whether the City maintains a local historic register or recognizes state/national listings; ask Planning (Not found in retrieved materials)
“Historic district” definition / mapping	ADU parking exemption depends on being within an “architecturally and historically significant historic district.” If no district map exists, the exemption may not be available	Request the City's official map/list of historic districts or policy interpreting § 17.104.160(A)(2)
Reliance on objective‑standards exemption	Exemption from objective standards does not mean no review — Residential Review Board and other discretionary processes still apply and focus on compatibility	Verify what discretionary criteria will be applied in practice (see § 17.68.040)
Demolition-review procedures	If no demolition review or certificate-of-appropriateness rules appear in Title 17, demolition outcomes may be handled under other code chapters or building codes	Confirm whether demolition review is handled by the Planning Department, Building Division, or a separate ordinance (Not found in retrieved materials)
Parcel‑specific dimensional rules	Title 17 contains many numeric standards (heights, setbacks, parking) but the excerpts don’t show a single consolidated table for every zone	Verify exact numeric standards for your parcel and any PD‑PS that applies; see § 17.12.070 for the R‑2 height example

Plain‑English Summary

Paramount’s zoning code treats “historic properties” as exceptions to the City’s objective residential design standards and routes most residential historic projects through the Residential Review Board (R‑1, R‑2, R‑M) for compatibility findings; there is a specific ADU parking exception if a property sits inside an “architecturally and historically significant historic district,” but the code excerpts provided do not show a local landmark designation or demolition‑review chapter — verify with Planning. § 17.12.080 § 17.68.030 § 17.104.160

Information Gaps (what was not confirmed in the retrieved materials)

No local ordinance text for a landmark designation procedure or local historic register — Not found in retrieved materials.
No formal historic preservation overlay or mapped historic‑district boundaries included in the retrieved files — Not found in retrieved materials.
No explicit demolition‑review or certificate of appropriateness process for historic resources in the excerpts — Not found in retrieved materials.
No local incentives (e.g., Mills Act agreements) or tax‑abatement programs for historic properties in the retrieved materials — Not found in retrieved materials.

Source References

City of Paramount, Title 17 (Zoning) — zoning classifications and general purposes: § 17.04.020; § 17.04.030
Objective design standards and historic‑property exclusion: § 17.12.080; § 17.16.120
Site plan and parking requirements affecting historic projects: § 17.16.125
Residential Review Board jurisdiction and findings: § 17.68.030; § 17.68.040; § 17.68.050
ADU parking exception for historic districts: § 17.104.160(A)(2)
PD‑PS planned development explanation: § 17.72.010
California Historical Building Code (context for “qualified historical building or property” definitions — state code, not a local ordinance): 2025 California Historical Building Code
For the City zoning overview, visit Paramount Zoning & Planning overview: Paramount zoning & planning overview (internal site navigation)
For related local topics referenced above, see: Paramount Zoning, Paramount Development Standards, Paramount Parking, Paramount Design Review, Paramount Overlay Districts, Paramount ADUs, California Building Standards Code

Sources

Retrieved passages

Paramount Zoning Code (§ 44-227) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (§ 44-155) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (title as) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (§ 44-49) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (§ 44-34) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (§ 44-225) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code Medium relevance
CBC § 4 (chapter will) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (section shall) Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code Medium relevance
Paramount Zoning Code (§ 44-75.5) Medium relevance

Cited sections

Official Paramount code library

Frequently asked questions

What does Title 17 say about historic properties and objective design standards in Paramount?

Title 17 explicitly excludes historic properties from the City's objective residential design standards; see § 17.12.080 and § 17.16.120 for the exemption language and applicability. § 17.12.080 § 17.16.120

Do I need Residential Review Board approval to alter a historic single‑family house?

If the property is in R‑1, R‑2, or R‑M, the Residential Review Board must review building‑permit applications and make the findings in § 17.68.040 before issuance; that applies to projects in those residential zones even where objective standards are exempt. § 17.68.030

Is there a local landmark or historic‑district designation process in Paramount’s zoning code?

A local landmark designation procedure or a mapped historic‑district ordinance is not found in the retrieved Title 17 materials. Confirm with the Planning Department whether a separate local ordinance or a registry exists (Not found in retrieved materials).

If I add an ADU to a historic house, will I have to provide parking?

The ADU chapter states the City will not require parking for an ADU located within “an architecturally and historically significant historic district,” as listed in § 17.104.160(A)(2). You must verify whether your property is actually inside such a formally recognized historic district. § 17.104.160

Are there demolition‑review or certificates‑of‑appropriateness for historic buildings in Title 17?

No demolition‑review or certificate‑of‑appropriateness rules were identified in the provided Title 17 excerpts — Not found in retrieved materials. Ask the Planning Department whether demolition review is handled under a separate ordinance or administrative process.

What standards will the Residential Review Board use to judge compatibility?

The Board must find the proposal will not be detrimental to zone character and must consider setbacks, building height, parking and ingress/egress, walls, landscaping, and gross floor area among other factors per § 17.68.040. § 17.68.040

Where is “historic property” defined for local purposes?

A local definition for "historic property" or a local register definition was not located in the retrieved Title 17 excerpts. For a commonly used definition and designations used at the state level, consult the California Historical Building Code definition of a “qualified historical building or property” (state code) — see California Historical Building Code (2025) for context. Not found in retrieved materials; see California Historical Building Code for state context.

Can objective design standards be applied to my historic renovation project?

By text, objective residential standards sections exclude historic properties from those objective requirements (so they are not applied automatically), but the project will still be reviewed under discretionary criteria (Residential Review Board or other applicable provisions). Check § 17.12.080 and § 17.16.120 and coordinate with Planning to learn which discretionary standards will control. § 17.12.080 § 17.16.120

How do I appeal a Residential Review Board decision on a historic property?

Decisions of the Residential Review Board may be appealed to the Planning Commission within 10 days, and subsequently to the City Council as provided in § 17.68.050 (appeal timelines and process). § 17.68.050

If my property is in a planned development (PD‑PS), how does that affect historic review?

Where a PD‑PS applies the PD ordinance controls development standards for that specific area (§ 17.72.010). Any historic‑project review must follow the specific PD ordinance and Title 17 cross-references — check the PD ordinance text to see whether it contains preservation provisions. § 17.72.010

Ask about any Paramount property

Get a cited, plain-English answer on Paramount zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.

Start Free Trial