Local zoning · Ferndale
Ferndale — Signage
Signage under the Ferndale local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.
Last reviewed: July 6, 2026
Overview
Signage in Ferndale is governed by the City’s Zoning Ordinance and a stand‑alone 2013 Sign Ordinance. In 2013, Ferndale repealed its in‑code sign chapter and related definitions, shifting most technical standards to Ordinance 2013‑02; today, the Zoning Ordinance primarily directs how signs are reviewed and where certain sign‑related uses occur. Applicants should start with the city’s zoning & planning overview and confirm district and overlay before proposing any sign.
Most projects: Before any sign is erected, altered, or its outward appearance changed, Ferndale requires a Design Review Permit unless the sign is exempted by the 2013 Sign Ordinance (§ 6.05.2) .
How Ferndale regulates signs today
- Citywide review trigger: The Design Control Combining or -D Zone sets the city’s design review procedures. It explicitly includes ensuring the “design and location of signs” fit the character and scale of buildings and surroundings (§ 6.05.1(d)) . A Design Review Permit is required “before any sign…may be erected [or] structurally altered,” unless the sign is exempted by Ordinance 2013‑02 (§ 6.05.2) . See Ferndale Design Review.
- Stand‑alone Sign Ordinance: In 2013, Ferndale adopted a separate sign ordinance and repealed the prior in‑code sign article (§ 7.23) and the definition of “Sign” in Article 3 (Ord. 2013‑02). The ordinance history log shows that § 7.23 and related items were repealed on 11/7/2013 (Ord. 2013‑02) , and the code margin notes show “Sign” in Article 3 was repealed by the 2013 Sign Ordinance (§ 3, “Sign: [repealed]”) . The full text of Ordinance 2013‑02 was not included in the retrieved files (see “Information Gaps” below).
- Zone‑specific sign use: In the Highway Service Commercial or CH district, “outdoor advertising signs and structures which identify the use or pertain directly to the service or product offered on the site” are listed as principal permitted uses (§ 5.07.1(f)) . Start with Ferndale Zoning to confirm your base zone.
- Historic context: Portions of Main Street are a National Register district and are typically within the -D combining zone. Within such areas, the design review purpose statement makes sign compatibility with historic character a decision criterion (§ 6.05.1(d)) . See Ferndale Historic Preservation and Overlay Districts.
- What’s no longer in the code: Prior “Signs and Nameplates” and various yard/yard‑sale sign cross‑references were modified or repealed with the sign update; for example, the ordinance margin notes reflect repeal language tied to the 2013 Sign Ordinance (§ 7.22 header/notes; § 7.27/§ 7.28 notes) .
Tip: Structural, electrical, and energy standards for illuminated or large signs live under the California Building Standards Code. Ferndale’s zoning review is separate and focuses on location, design, and compatibility.
Quick standards and process highlights
- Design review applies to signage unless your sign is categorically exempted by Ordinance 2013‑02 (§ 6.05.2) .
- The Planning Commission is the decision‑maker for design review; actions are appealable to City Council (§ 6.05.4(a), (f)) .
- CH zone uniquely lists certain outdoor advertising signs as a principal use (§ 5.07.1(f)) .
- The former sign definitions and general sign article in the zoning code are repealed; consult Ordinance 2013‑02 for sizes, types, illumination, and exemptions (Ord. 2013‑02 recorded in ordinance history; § 3 “Sign: [repealed]”; § 7.23 [repealed]) .
Decision‑relevant table
| Topic | What the current Zoning Ordinance says | Where it’s controlled now | Code Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design compatibility | Signs must be visually harmonious with buildings and surroundings; design review considers sign materials, colors, and placement in context | -D combining zone policies and Design Review | § 6.05.1(d) |
| Review trigger | Design Review Permit required before erecting or altering any sign unless exempted | Design Review; exemptions defined by Ordinance 2013‑02 | § 6.05.2; Ord. 2013‑02 reference |
| Zone‑specific sign use | Outdoor advertising signs/structures as a principal permitted use where they identify on‑site use | CH district | § 5.07.1(f) |
| In‑code sign chapter | City repealed in‑code sign article and sign definition | Stand‑alone 2013 Sign Ordinance | Ord. 2013‑02 (history log shows repeal of § 7.23; Article 3 “Sign” repealed) |
| Appeals | Planning Commission decisions on design review are appealable to City Council | Article 11 (Appeals) | § 6.05.4(f) |
District‑by‑district signage notes
Below are signage‑specific takeaways by district. Use this with the Ferndale Zoning map to confirm your base zone, then check whether a combining overlay (especially -D) applies.
R‑1, R‑2, R‑3 (Residential One‑Family, Two‑Family, Multiple‑Family)
- Signage policy: No zone‑specific sign standards are stated in the retrieved zoning text; residential signage is governed by Ordinance 2013‑02 and any -D design review where applicable. Not found in retrieved materials for sizes/types. Verify with the jurisdiction. References to prior sign provisions were repealed in 2013 (Ord. 2013‑02) .
- Review path: Design Review required unless exempted (§ 6.05.2) .
C‑1 (Neighborhood Commercial) and C‑2 (Community Commercial)
- Signage policy: Zone‑specific sign standards not shown in retrieved text; governed by Ordinance 2013‑02 and -D where applicable. Not found in retrieved materials for sizes/types.
- Review path: Design Review unless exempted (§ 6.05.2) .
CH (Highway Service Commercial)
- Signage policy: Allows “outdoor advertising signs and structures which identify the use or pertain directly to the service or product offered on the site” as a principal permitted use (§ 5.07.1(f)) . All other sign details come from Ordinance 2013‑02.
- Review path: Design Review unless exempted (§ 6.05.2) .
ML (Limited Industrial) and M‑H (Heavy Industrial)
- Signage policy: No zone‑specific sign standards appear in the retrieved text; governed by Ordinance 2013‑02 and the -D overlay where present. Not found in retrieved materials for sizes/types.
- Review path: Design Review unless exempted (§ 6.05.2) .
AE (Agriculture‑Exclusive), PF (Public Facility), FW (Floodway), FP (Flood Plain), PD (Planned Development)
- Signage policy: No sign‑specific standards were retrieved for these districts; governed by Ordinance 2013‑02 and any applicable overlays. Not found in retrieved materials for sizes/types.
- Review path: Design Review unless exempted (§ 6.05.2) .
Combining/Overlay Zones (selected)
- -D Design Control Combining Zone: Sign design, materials, colors, and location must be compatible with building character and surroundings (§ 6.05.1(d)); design review is the norm unless exempted (§ 6.05.2) . See Overlay Districts.
- -Q, -A, -B, -X, -H, -SPA: No signage‑specific standards were retrieved. Not found in retrieved materials.
Information Gaps
Items the stand‑alone 2013 Sign Ordinance (not included in the retrieved file set) would normally specify:
- Allowed sign types by zone (wall, projecting, monument, window, A‑frame), size/height/area, and number — Not found in retrieved materials.
- Illumination standards, electronic message centers, and animation — Not found in retrieved materials.
- Temporary signs (grand opening, banners, posters, real estate) — Not found in retrieved materials.
- Prohibited signs, maintenance, and removal of abandoned signs — Not found in retrieved materials.
- Nonconforming sign rules and amortization — Not found in retrieved materials. For general nonconforming use concepts, see Article 12 (example: § 12.01.8 reference to Historic District context) and Ferndale Nonconforming Uses .
- Permit exemptions list (what the 2013 ordinance exempts from design review) — Not found in retrieved materials.
Practical guidance
- Start by confirming your base zone and whether your site is in the -D overlay. The -D overlay is common in the historic core and makes design context central to the sign decision (§ 6.05.1(d)) .
- Expect to file for Design Review unless your sign is on the 2013 ordinance’s exemption list (§ 6.05.2) . See Ferndale Design Review.
- In the CH district, on‑premise outdoor advertising signs are a principal permitted use if they identify on‑site goods/services (§ 5.07.1(f)) — you will still need design review unless exempt .
- If you need relief from a standard or a condition attached to a permit, explore Variances and Exceptions.
- Construction, electrical, and energy questions for illuminated or structural signs are covered under the California Building Standards Code; zoning approval does not replace those requirements.
Checklist
- Identify your base zone and whether a combining overlay (especially -D) applies (Ferndale Zoning).
- Determine if your proposed sign is exempt from design review under Ordinance 2013‑02 (Not found in retrieved materials; Verify with the jurisdiction).
- If not exempt, prepare a Design Review application with site photos, scaled drawings, materials, and colors (§ 6.05.3) .
- If in or near the historic core, align design with historic character; be ready to address materials, scale, and placement (§ 6.05.1(d)) .
- For CH sites considering outdoor advertising signage, confirm it identifies on‑site services (§ 5.07.1(f)) .
- Confirm any structural/electrical needs are handled under the state building code (separate from zoning).
- If conditions are imposed, note appeal rights and time limits (§ 6.05.4(f)) .
Risks & Ambiguities
| Issue | Why it matters | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Missing 2013 Sign Ordinance text | Exact size, height, illumination, and exemption rules live there | Request Ordinance 2013‑02 from the City; confirm exemptions and standards (Ord. 2013‑02 cited in code history) |
| Is your sign “exempt”? | Exemptions determine whether design review is required | Check the exemption list in Ordinance 2013‑02; if unclear, ask Planning staff (§ 6.05.2) |
| Historic context and -D overlay boundaries | Different streetscapes may warrant different design responses | Confirm if your parcel is within the -D overlay and/or the Main Street Historic area; tailor materials/colors (§ 6.05.1(d)) |
| “Outdoor advertising signs” in CH | Must identify on‑site goods/services | Ensure your concept meets the on‑site identification language (§ 5.07.1(f)) |
| Nonconforming sign status | Existing signs may have different rules | Ask staff how Article 12 is applied to existing signs; limited Article 12 text was retrieved (example: § 12.01.8) |
Plain-English Summary
Ferndale moved its detailed sign rules into a separate 2013 Sign Ordinance. The zoning code now mainly tells you to get design review for most signs (unless an exemption in the 2013 ordinance applies) and to make sure your sign fits the building and streetscape—especially in the historic core covered by the -D overlay (§ 6.05.1(d), § 6.05.2) . Highway‑oriented CH properties may have on‑premise outdoor advertising signs as a principal use, but you still need to meet design review unless exempt (§ 5.07.1(f)) .
Source References
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — § 6.05.1(d), § 6.05.2 (Design Control Combining or -D Zone; Design Review for signs) .
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — § 6.05.4(a), (f) (Design Review procedures; appeals) .
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — § 5.07.1(f) (CH zone: outdoor advertising signs/structures identifying on‑site use) .
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — Article 3, “Sign: [repealed]” (signals relocation of sign standards to Ord. 2013‑02) .
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — Ordinance history log noting Ord. 2013‑02 repeal of § 7.23 and related items (11/7/2013) .
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — Notes reflecting 2013 Sign Ordinance effects within Article 7 headings (§ 7.22, § 7.27/§ 7.28 margin notes) .
Sources
Retrieved passages
- Ferndale Zoning Code (§7.23) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (Section amended) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (§6.04) Medium relevance
- CGBSC § A6.209.5 (Title 20.) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (§9.07) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (Section 3.48) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (ARTICLE 1) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (section added) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (§5.07) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (ARTICLE 13) Medium relevance
- Ferndale Zoning Code (Section amended) Medium relevance
- CBC § H109 (SECTION H109) Medium relevance
- CEC § H103 (SECTION H103) Medium relevance
Cited sections
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — § 6.05.1(d), § 6.05.2 (Design Control Combining or -D Zone; Design Review for signs) . (§ 6.05.1)
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — § 6.05.4(a), (f) (Design Review procedures; appeals) . (§ 6.05.4)
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — § 5.07.1(f) (CH zone: outdoor advertising signs/structures identifying on‑site use) . (§ 5.07.1)
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — Article 3, “Sign: [repealed]” (signals relocation of sign standards to Ord. 2013‑02) . (Article 3)
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — Ordinance history log noting Ord. 2013‑02 repeal of § 7.23 and related items (11/7/2013) . (§ 7.23)
- Ferndale Zoning Ordinance 02‑02 — Notes reflecting 2013 Sign Ordinance effects within Article 7 headings (§ 7.22, § 7.27/§ 7.28 margin notes) . (Article 7)
- Ferndale_ZoningCode.md
Frequently asked questions
Do I need design review for a new business sign in Ferndale?
Usually yes. Ferndale requires a Design Review Permit before any sign is erected or altered unless the sign is specifically exempted by the 2013 Sign Ordinance (§ 6.05.2) . Check whether your site is in the -D overlay and whether your sign type is on the exemption list (Not found in retrieved materials; Verify with the jurisdiction).
Are sandwich boards or temporary banners allowed?
This depends on the 2013 Sign Ordinance, which contains the exemption and temporary sign rules; those details were not in the retrieved materials. Not found in retrieved materials. Verify with the jurisdiction. Design review does not apply if your sign is on the ordinance’s exemption list (§ 6.05.2) .
Can I install a billboard or pole sign along the highway?
In the CH district, “outdoor advertising signs and structures” are a principal permitted use if they identify on‑site services (§ 5.07.1(f)) . You’ll still need to satisfy design review unless exempted and comply with any size/height/location standards in the 2013 Sign Ordinance (Not found in retrieved materials).
How does being in the historic district affect my sign?
If your site is in the -D overlay (common in the historic core), the Planning Commission must find your sign’s design, materials, colors, and placement are visually harmonious with the building and surroundings (§ 6.05.1(d)) . Expect to show scaled drawings, materials, and colors (§ 6.05.3) .
What if my existing sign doesn’t meet current rules?
Nonconforming sign specifics were not included in the retrieved files. Not found in retrieved materials. Verify with the jurisdiction. As a general matter, Ferndale manages nonconforming situations in Article 12 of the Zoning Ordinance (example reference: § 12.01.8) and through Nonconforming Uses .
Who decides on my sign application, and can I appeal?
The Planning Commission acts on Design Review applications, and decisions can be appealed to the City Council (§ 6.05.4(a), (f)) . See Variances and Exceptions if you need relief from specific standards or conditions.
Do signs affect parking or other development standards?
The zoning text provided does not tie signage to parking counts or other development standards. Not found in retrieved materials. Verify with the jurisdiction and the 2013 Sign Ordinance.
Are illuminated signs regulated?
Illumination standards would be in the 2013 Sign Ordinance and in the state building/electrical codes. Zoning focuses on design/location compatibility (§ 6.05.1(d)) ; construction/electrical aspects are covered by the California Building Standards Code.
More in Ferndale code
Ask about any Ferndale property
Get a cited, plain-English answer on Ferndale zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.
Start Free Trial