Local zoning · Culver City

Culver City — Development Standards

Development Standards under the Culver City local zoning and planning code, with the controlling citations.

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026

Overview

This page summarizes the Culver City zoning ordinance (Title 17) rules that control how buildings sit on lots: setbacks, height, lot coverage, density, and FAR. It focuses on what the City’s code actually requires for the main zoning districts and key overlays in Culver City, with the controlling code sections called out so you can verify parcel‑specific rules. For procedural topics like design review, parking, and ADUs see those pages for process and forms.

Quick navigation: the City’s setback rules live in § 17.300.020; height measurement and exceptions are in § 17.300.025; district development tables are in Article 2 (e.g., Table 2‑4, Table 2‑8); the Residential Hillsides Overlay standards are in § 17.260.040; and Transit‑Oriented standards use Table 4‑6. See each citation below when the standard is quoted.


How this page is organized

  • District‑by‑district breakdowns (purpose, typical uses, key dimensional standards, where they apply). Each district heading names the actual City district code (bolded).
  • A decision‑relevant summary table that you can use at intake.
  • Practical checklist, risks/ambiguities, and a homeowner plain‑English summary.
  • Source list tying every cited item back to the City code (with § references).

Residential districts — RLD, RMD, RHD

Purpose and where used

  • RLD, RMD, and RHD are Culver City’s low, medium, and high density residential districts used across single‑ and multi‑family neighborhoods and mixed residential blocks. The district development standards are tabulated in the City’s Residential District table (Table 2‑4).

Typical permitted uses

  • RLD: primarily single‑family and small multi‑unit where permitted;
  • RMD and RHD: multifamily dwellings, townhouses, and residential developments consistent with the density bands shown in Table 2‑4. (Specific allowed uses and conditional uses are listed in Article 2; consult the zoning use table for parcel‑level allowable uses.) Not found in retrieved materials: a complete, line‑by‑line use list for each district—verify with the City’s use table.

Key dimensional standards (from Table 2‑4)

  • Maximum height (primary building): 32 ft in RLD, 43 ft in RMD, 53 ft in RHD. See height measurement/exceptions in § 17.300.025.
  • Maximum residential density: 35 du/acre (RLD), 50 du/acre (RMD), 70 du/acre (RHD).
  • Setbacks and building location: front/street side minimums (e.g., 5 ft in many residential ground‑floor situations) and interior rules appear in the district tables and in the setback chapter § 17.300.020.

Special rules

  • Height stepbacks when abutting lower‑intensity residential (references to R1/R2 contexts appear in the R‑zone standards): above 30 ft (or two stories, whichever is less) upper floors are required to step back per the district rules (see Figure 2‑3 Neighborhood Transitions).

Practical note

  • For multifamily projects in low‑density zones that are pursued as transit‑oriented developments, the code allows applying the Medium‑Density Multiple‑Family (RMD/RMD standards) or the Transit‑Oriented table instead—see the Transit‑Oriented section below for how densities/FARs change.

Mixed‑Use districts — MU‑MD, MU‑HD, MU‑I

Purpose and where used

  • MU‑MD, MU‑HD, and MU‑I structure mixed residential + commercial development along commercial corridors and nodes. Standards are in Table 2‑8.

Typical permitted uses

  • Ground‑floor retail/office with residential above is the intended form; exact permissible uses (retail, restaurant, personal services, residential) are controlled by the use tables in Article 2. Not found in retrieved materials: a parcel‑level permitted uses listing. Verify with the district use table.

Key dimensional standards (from Table 2‑8)

  • Maximum height (primary structure): 56 ft in all MU zones (subject to § 17.300.025).
  • Maximum residential density: 65 du/ac (MU‑MD), 100 du/ac (MU‑HD), 65 du/ac (MU‑I).
  • Maximum non‑residential FAR: 3.0 (MU‑MD), 4.0 (MU‑HD), 3.0 (MU‑I).
  • Front and street side setbacks (residential ground floor): 10 ft minimum in MU zones (see Figure 2‑5), with additional site‑specific rules in Article 3.

Practical note

  • Mixed‑use projects face height stepback rules where abutting lower residential parcels and must follow the same stepback guidance cited in the residential table to protect neighborhood transitions.

Planned Development — PD

Purpose and where used

  • The PD zone is used for site‑specific comprehensive development standards established by City Council through rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan for the site; allowed uses and site standards are set by the PD approval, informed by similar base zones.

Typical permitted uses

  • Determined at the time of rezoning/PD approval; the PD may adopt residential, commercial, mixed use, or other uses and tailor standards to the site.

Key dimensional standards

  • Maximum height in PD: generally 56 ft unless a height exception is granted under § 17.300.025 or the PD approval establishes another limit.

Practical note

  • PD approvals can include site‑specific deviations, but those deviations are established by the PD ordinance; consult the PD table (Table 2‑9) for site listings and code/ordinance of record.

Residential Hillsides Overlay — -RH

Purpose and where used

  • The -RH Overlay addresses hillside lots and imposes slope‑sensitive standards intended to limit massing and protect hillside character. The Overlay standards are in § 17.260.040 (Table 2‑10).

Typical permitted uses

  • Underlying zone controls uses; the overlay modifies development standards (setbacks, FAR, height) for hillside parcels.

Key dimensional standards (Table 2‑10)

  • Maximum dwelling units per parcel: 1 unit (overlay default). Minimum by‑right floor area: 2,500 sq ft regardless of lot size (see notes).
  • FAR by slope: e.g., 0.45 FAR for slope <15%; then stepped down to 0.40, 0.35, 0.30, 0.25 as slope increases (see Table 2‑10).
  • Setbacks: Front: 20 ft for single‑story; 30 ft for second story of a two‑story structure; Side: first floor = 10% of lot width (min 5 ft / max 10 ft); second floor narrow setback = 16% (min 8 ft, max 16 ft); second floor wide or street‑facing setback = 24% (min 12 ft, max 24 ft); Rear: 15 ft.
  • Height limits by slope: e.g., slope <50%: flat roof = 2 stories and 27 ft, sloped roof = 2 stories and 30 ft; slope 50–100%: 1 story and 14 ft.

Practical note

  • Slope must be established by topographic survey prior to permit issuance; many -RH rules reference lot slope for FAR and height—verify with site topo.

Transit‑Oriented (TOC) development standards

Purpose and where used

  • Transit‑oriented housing projects may use the separate Transit‑Oriented standards in Table 4‑6, which tie maximum height, density, and FAR to the project’s straight‑line distance to the nearest transit stop (e.g., 200 ft, 1/4 mile, 1/2 mile). See Table 4‑6 and related text at § 17.* (Article 4).

Key numbers (Table 4‑6)

  • 200 ft from transit stop: 85 ft height, 140 du/ac, 4.0 FAR.
  • 1/4 mile: 65 ft, 100 du/ac, 3.0 FAR.
  • 1/2 mile: 55 ft, 80 du/ac, 2.5 FAR.

Practical note

  • The TOC standards supersede or adjust the underlying zone standards only to the extent necessary to achieve the listed FAR/density; otherwise the underlying zone standards apply. See the Transit‑Oriented chapter and density bonus rules for interaction with State law.

Quick reference table — decision‑relevant standards

District Max Height (primary) Max Residential Density (du/ac) Max FAR / Lot rules Code Reference
RLD 32 ft 35 du/ac Standard FAR/coverage by site; see § 17.300.020 for setbacks § 17.200 (Table 2‑4)
RMD 43 ft 50 du/ac See Table 2‑4 and Supplementals (§ 17.210.030) § 17.200 (Table 2‑4)
RHD 53 ft 70 du/ac See Table 2‑4 § 17.200 (Table 2‑4)
MU‑MD / MU‑HD / MU‑I 56 ft 65 / 100 / 65 du/ac Max non‑res FAR 3.0 / 4.0 / 3.0 Table 2‑8 (§ 17.*)
PD Typically 56 ft or PD‑specific limit Set by PD approval PD sets lot/site standards — Council adopts § 17.240.015 / Table 2‑9
-RH (overlay) Varies by slope (e.g., 27 ft flat roof for <50% slope) 1 unit/parcel default; min floor area 2,500 sf FAR varies by slope 0.45 → 0.25 scale; specific setbacks: Front 20/30 ft, Rear 15 ft, side % rules § 17.260.040 (Table 2‑10)
Transit‑Oriented (Table 4‑6) 85/65/55 ft (200 ft / 1/4 mi / 1/2 mi) 140 / 100 / 80 du/ac 4.0 / 3.0 / 2.5 FAR by distance Table 4‑6 (§ 17.*)

(When a code citation above references a table, consult that table and the text (e.g., § 17.210.030, § 17.300.020, § 17.300.025) for measurement rules and exceptions.)


Checklist — what an applicant must satisfy

  • Confirm zoning district and underlying use permissions (Article 2 / Table 2‑4 or Table 2‑8). Verify permitted uses against the City’s use table. Not found in retrieved materials: the full use list by parcel—verify with the Division.
  • Demonstrate compliance with setback rules and allowed projections per § 17.300.020 (measure setbacks as specified).
  • Verify height measurement and any applicable exceptions under § 17.300.025; show roof type and parapet calculations.
  • Calculate allowable density and FAR from the applicable table: Table 2‑4 (residential), Table 2‑8 (mixed use), Table 4‑6 (transit‑oriented) or Table 2‑10 (-RH overlay) as applicable; include slope survey for -RH.
  • If proposing TOC project, measure straight‑line distance to nearest transit stop per Table 4‑6 rules and include calculation.
  • Prepare parking and driveway layout consistent with parking and § 17.320 design rules (driveway lengths, front‑yard paving limits).
  • If in an overlay (-RH, -CV, -RP, etc.), confirm overlay special standards and whether exceptions apply; see overlay districts.
  • Factor in design review and potential Planning Commission review for exceptions, waivers or PDs; submit stepback/fenestration diagrams to show neighborhood transitions.
  • If proposing ADU, confirm overlay/district standards vs. state ADU law; see ADUs and California ADU law. Not found in retrieved materials: detailed ADU numeric allowances within Title 17 beyond references to § 17.400.095—consult § 17.400.095 and state law for mandatory allowances.

Risks & Ambiguities

Issue Why it matters What to verify
FAR vs. "residential floor area" definitions Overlay and Table notes (e.g., -RH) include special floor area counting (mezzanines, porches, garages exemptions) which change usable FAR and unit yield. Miscounting causes re‑submittal. Confirm the code’s residential floor area definition and any garage exemptions in § 17.260.040 (‑RH) and related definitions; provide topo and floor‑area calcs.
Transit‑oriented standards interaction with underlying zone TOC Table 4‑6 grants higher heights/density/FAR — but underlying zone rules still apply where they don't preclude TOC FAR. Misapplication can lead to illegal massing. Show a side‑by‑side demonstration of which standards are being superseded per Table 4‑6 and cite Table 4‑6 and the TOC chapter.
Setback exceptions and Planning Commission discretion Setback exceptions require findings (e.g., special circumstances). Uncertain exceptions lead to discretionary review and delay. If seeking an exception, provide findings per § 17.300.020.E and budget Planning Commission review time.
Slope determination for -RH FAR/height FAR and height bands in -RH rely on existing slope; City requires topo/slope analysis prior to permits. Wrong slope band changes allowable FAR. Submit a certified topographic survey showing existing slope per § 17.260.040 (notes) and follow slope‑based FAR table.
ADU local vs state conflict State ADU law limits what local standards can do (e.g., cannot preclude an 800 sf ADU with 4‑ft setbacks). If local Title 17 is more restrictive, state law may control. Compare local ADU rules in § 17.400.095 with state ADU law; where unclear, verify with the City and reference California ADU law. Not found in retrieved materials: full text of § 17.400.095 in these excerpts—review that section.

Plain‑English summary

Culver City’s zoning code tells you how tall a building can be, how close it can be to the street and neighbors, and how many units or how much floor area you can build. Most neighborhoods use the RLD / RMD / RHD tables for height and density, mixed corridors use MU tables, PDs are site‑specific, the -RH overlay adds slope‑based FAR and stricter setbacks, and transit‑proximate projects can use the higher limits in Table 4‑6 — always measure setbacks and height the way the code specifies and bring a topo when slope matters. See the cited code sections to confirm numbers for your parcel.


Source References

  • Culver City Municipal Code, Title 17 — Setback Regulations and Exceptions: § 17.300.020.
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Height Measurement and Height Limit Exceptions: § 17.300.025.
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Residential District Development Standards (Table 2‑4) (RLD, RMD, RHD).
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Mixed Use District Development Standards (Table 2‑8) (MU‑MD, MU‑HD, MU‑I).
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Residential Hillsides Overlay (Table 2‑10) and text: § 17.260.040.
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Transit‑Oriented Development Standards (Table 4‑6).
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Planned Development (PD) rules and established PD list: § 17.240.015 and Table 2‑9.
  • Culver City Municipal Code — Accessory structure and accessory dwelling references (see § 17.400.095; accessory structures rules in accessory chapter).
  • GoCodebook local topic pages (for related process and explainers): Culver City Zoning, Culver City Land Use, Culver City Parking, Culver City Design Review, Culver City Overlay Districts, Culver City ADUs, California Building Standards Code. (Use these for process, not to replace Title 17 numeric standards.)

If you need parcel‑specific verification (e.g., exact use tables, historic property status that changes standards, or the full text of § 17.400.095 on ADUs), verify with the City Planning Division and consult the full Title 17 text. Not found in retrieved materials: a complete, consolidated permitted‑uses list per district within these excerpts—verify with the City.

Sources

Retrieved passages

  • Culver City Zoning Code (§ 17.300.020) High relevance
  • Culver City Zoning Code (§ 17.300.025) High relevance
  • Culver City Zoning Code (§ 17.210.030) High relevance
  • Culver City Zoning Code (§ 17.400.095) High relevance
  • CBC § 66314 (§ 66314) High relevance
  • Culver City Zoning Code (§ 17.240.015.C.) High relevance
  • Culver City Zoning Code (section requires) High relevance
  • Culver City Zoning Code (§ 65915.) High relevance

Cited sections

Frequently asked questions

What can I build on an R‑1 lot in Culver City?

Many Culver City references to “R1/R2” appear in transitional/stepback language, but the current district tables use RLD/RMD/RHD categories for the bulk standards. Permitted uses and exact allowances for a parcel labelled R‑1 historically must be checked against the City’s Article 2 use table and the parcel’s official zoning designation; dimensional standards for the modern equivalents are in Table 2‑4. See Table 2‑4 and the setback chapter § 17.300.020 for setbacks.

What are Culver City setback requirements?

Setbacks are measured and regulated in § 17.300.020. The code defines front, street‑side, interior side, and rear setback measurement methods, lists allowed projections into setbacks, and provides specific numeric setbacks per district (see district tables and Figure 2‑5). Exceptions and variance/exception findings are also in the section.

How is building height measured in Culver City and what are the height limits?

Height measurement and exceptions are set out in § 17.300.025; district maximums are in the district tables (e.g., 32 ft RLD, 43 ft RMD, 56 ft in many MU/PD contexts). Parapets, roof type (flat vs. sloped), and specific exceptions are addressed in the height section — always check § 17.300.025 for measuring roof height and allowable parapet inclusions.

Do transit‑adjacent projects get higher FAR or density?

Yes. Transit‑oriented housing projects may use Table 4‑6, which ties maximum height, density, and FAR to distance from a transit stop (e.g., 4.0 FAR / 140 du/ac / 85 ft at 200 ft). Use straight‑line measurement to the transit pedestrian access point as required in the TOC chapter. See Table 4‑6 text for measurement/implementation.

Are there special rules for hillside lots?

Yes — the Residential Hillsides Overlay (-RH) controls these lots: slope‑based FAR bands (e.g., 0.45 → 0.25 descending as slope increases), slope‑dependent height limits (e.g., 27 ft flat roof for <50% slope), and percentage‑based side setbacks (first floor 10% of lot width, with min/max). See § 17.260.040 (Table 2‑10) and provide a topo to establish slope.

How do ADU rules interact with the city development standards?

Title 17 references ADU rules (see § 17.400.095), but state ADU law also constrains what local code can require. The City’s ADU section should be checked for local numeric limits; where local rules conflict with state ADU protections (e.g., minimum size/allowable setbacks), state law may prevail. Verify both § 17.400.095 in Title 17 and current California ADU law; see the ADU explainer for process. Not found in retrieved snippets: the full local ADU section text in these excerpts—review § 17.400.095.

Do I need a variance to reduce setbacks or exceed height?

Minor projections and permitted exceptions are listed in § 17.300.020; full reductions require a variance or an administrative modification under Chapter 17.550, or a Planning Commission exception where findings must be made. Waivers/concessions may be available for qualifying density bonus projects per Chapter 17.580. If the proposed change is substantial, expect discretionary review.

What rules govern lot coverage and accessory structures?

Accessory structure rules (size limits, number, placement in setbacks, cumulative accessory floor area limits) are in the accessory residential structures chapter (see § 17.400.100 and related accessory structure rules). For example, cumulative floor area for accessory structures on a residential lot cannot exceed 800 sq ft in certain contexts; portable sheds, trash enclosures, and limited garage exceptions are addressed there. Verify § 17.400.* for the full list.

How are stepbacks handled where a taller building abuts lower residential lots?

The district tables require stepbacks when a building abuts an R1/R2 parcel or lower residential zone: typically starting above 30 ft (or two stories) upper floors must be stepped back 15 ft (with additional stepbacks above the next floors in some zones). See the neighborhood transition guidance and Figure 2‑3 in the district tables.

More in Culver City code

Ask about any Culver City property

Get a cited, plain-English answer on Culver City zoning, setbacks, FAR, ADUs and permits — for any address.

Start Free Trial

More Culver City zoning topics