Skip to content

Article 26. MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE

U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Ukraine Technical Explanation – 1994 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

This Article provides for cooperation between the competent authorities of the Contracting States to resolve disputes that may arise under the Convention and to resolve cases of double taxation not provided for in the Convention.

Paragraph 1 provides that, where a person considers that the actions of one or both Contracting States will result for him in taxation that is not in accordance with the Convention, he may present his case to the competent authority of his State of residence or citizenship. It is not necessary for a person first to have exhausted the remedies provided under the national laws of the Contracting States before presenting a case to the competent authorities. The Convention does not limit the time during which a case may be brought.

Paragraph 2 provides that, if the competent authority of the Contracting State to which the case is presented considers the case to have merit, and if it cannot reach a unilateral solution, it will seek agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State to avoid taxation not in accordance with the Convention. If agreement is reached under this provision, it is to be implemented even if implementation would be otherwise barred by the statute of limitations or by some other procedural limitation, such as a closing agreement. Because, as specified in paragraph 2 of Article 1 (General Scope), the Convention cannot operate to increase a taxpayer's liability, the Convention overrides time or other procedural limitations of domestic law only for the purpose of making refunds (not to impose additional tax) .

Paragraph 3 authorizes the competent authorities to seek to resolve difficulties or doubts that may arise as to the application or interpretation of the Convention. The paragraph includes a non-exhaustive list of examples of the kinds of matters about which the competent authorities may reach agreement. They may agree to the same attribution of income, deductions, credits or allowances between a resident of one Contracting State and its permanent establishment in the other, and to the allocation of income, deductions, credits or allowances between persons. These allocations are to be made in


accordance with the arm's length principles of Article 7 (Business Profits) and Article 9 (Associated Enterprises). The competent authorities may also agree to settle a variety of conflicting applications of the Convention, including those regarding the characterization of items of income, the application of source rules to particular items of income, and differences in meanings of a term. Agreements reached by the competent authorities under this paragraph need not conform to the internal law provisions of either Contracting State. The competent authorities also may address cases of double taxation not foreseen by the Convention and attempt to reach an agreement that would prevent that result.

Paragraph 4 authorizes the competent authorities to communicate with each other directly for these purposes. It is not necessary to communicate through diplomatic channels.

The benefits of this Article are also available to residents of either Contracting State. (See paragraph 4(a) of Article 1 (General Scope).)

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — U.S. Income Tax Treaty — Ukraine Technical Explanation – 1994

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.