Notice 2024-61 TABLE 2
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2024-34 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AND
PHASE-OUT AMOUNTS Calendar Year Inflation Adjustment Factor Phase-out Amount 1991 1.0000 0 1992 1.0363 0 1993 1.0708 0 1994 1.0992 0 1995 1.1160 0 1996 1.1485 0 1997 1.1720 0 1998 1.1999 0 1999 1.2030 0 2000 1.2087 0 2001 1.2353 0 2002 1.2633 0 2003 1.2785 0 2004 1.2952 0 2005 1.3266 0 2006 1.3743 100 percent 2007 1.4222 100 percent 2008 1.4666 100 percent 2009 1.5003 100 percent 2010 1.5203 100 percent 2011 1.5326 100 percent 2012 1.5686 100 percent 2013 1.5968 100 percent 2014 1.5974 100 percent 2015 1.6245 100 percent 2016 1.6464 0 2017 1.6713 0 2018 1.7008 1.069 percent 2019 1.7334 100 percent 2020 1.7640 100 percent 2021 1.7849 0 2022 1.8607 100 percent 2023 1.9998 100 percent 2024 2.0615 100 percent
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is
Whitney Brady of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further informa
tion regarding this notice, contact Ms. Brady at (202) 317-6853 (not a toll-free number).
August 19, 2024 522 Bulletin No. 2024–34
of a weighting factor based on the credibility of the plan’s experience.
(2) Controlled group consistency requirement . The regulations provide certain exceptions to the general rule under § 430(h)(3)(C)(iv) and § 1.430(h)(3)-2(c) (1)(i), under which a plan sponsor may not use substitute mortality tables for any plan for a plan year unless substitute mortality tables are established and used for each other plan subject to § 430 that is maintained by the plan sponsor or a member of the plan sponsor’s controlled group (as defined in § 1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(1)(i)) for that plan year. Under § 1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(1)(ii), the use of substitute mortality tables for one plan is not prohibited merely because another plan maintained by the plan sponsor (or by a member of the plan sponsor’s controlled group) may not use substitute mortality tables because neither the males nor the females under that other plan have credible mortality information for a plan year. In addition, under § 1.430(h)(3)-2(f), the regulations provide a transition period for newly affiliated plans.
(3) Treatment of disabled individuals . If separate mortality tables are used for disabled individuals pursuant to § 430(h) (3)(D), then those individuals are disregarded for all purposes under this revenue procedure.
(4) Treatment of multiple-employer plans . A multiple-employer plan for which the proportion of the plan’s funding target attributable to employees and former employees of the employer and members of the employer’s controlled group is greater than 50 percent is treated as maintained by that employer for purposes of the controlled group consistency requirement pursuant to § 1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(7)(ii). By contrast, any other multiple-employer plan in which the employer or a member of the employer’s controlled group participates is not treated as maintained by the employer for purposes of the controlled group consistency requirement and is disregarded under this revenue procedure.
.03 Amendments to regulations relating to substitute mortality tables . TD 10005 includes amendments to the rules used to construct substitute mortality tables under
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code