SECTION 8. LONG-TERM
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2023-39 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
CONTRACTS UNDER § 460
.01 Purpose . The Treasury Department and the IRS are providing this interim
guidance to provide taxpayers with information about a proposed revision to the regulations under § 460 in forthcoming proposed regulations regarding how to apply the percentage-of-completion
method (PCM) to account for income from long-term contracts when allocable contract costs include SRE expenditures.
.02 Background . Section 460(a) generally requires use of the PCM to account for
Bulletin No. 2023–39 927 September 25, 2023
taxable income from a long-term contract. Section 1.460-4(b)(2)(i) provides that under the PCM, the portion of the contract price a taxpayer must report in a tax year corresponds to the ratio of incurred allocable contract costs to total estimated allocable contract costs. This ratio represents the portion of a contract considered completed for purposes of the PCM. Under the PCM, a taxpayer generally deducts allocable contract costs as they are incurred. As provided by § 1.460-4(b)(2)(iv), an increase in the percentage of the contract price to be reported is matched by deduction of the incurred costs that cause the increase. Under the current § 460 regulations in § 1.460-5(b)(2)(vi), allocable contract costs include research or experimental expenses, other than independent research and development expenses. Thus, when these expenses are incurred, they increase the portion of a contract considered completed and the percentage of the contract price required to be reported. The current § 460 regulations were drafted when a taxpayer could deduct currently research or experimental expenses under former § 174. Section 174(a), as amended by the TCJA, requires that SRE expenditures be charged to capital account and deducted over the applicable § 174 amortization period. As a result, the current § 460 regulations provide that incurred research or experimental expenses increase the percentage of the contract price required to be reported, although § 174(a) prevents a corresponding current deduction of incurred SRE expenditures. The resulting mismatch of contract price and contract costs is inconsistent with the contemplated operation of the PCM.
.03 Treatment of SRE expenditures under § 460 . The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate issuing proposed regulations that would amend the existing § 460 regulations, including § 1.460-5(b) (2)(vi), to provide that the costs allocable to a long-term contract accounted for using the PCM include amortization of SRE expenditures under § 174(a)(2) (B), rather than the capitalized amount of such expenditures, and that such amortization is treated as incurred for purposes of determining the percentage of contract completion as deducted. The amendments would not apply to expenditures previously capitalized under § 59(e)(2)(B) or
under former § 174(b), or to independent research and development expenditures, as defined in § 460(c)(5), which are not allocable contract costs. Research or experimental expenditures that are not independent research and development expenditures, however, would remain subject to allocation under § 460(c) (1) regardless of whether they are SRE expenditures.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code