SECTION 2. HIGHLIGHTS OF

CHANGES TO THE 2014 QI AGREEMENT

.01 Qualified Derivatives Dealers and Section 871(m) . On September 18, 2015,

final and temporary regulations under section 871(m) and sections 1441, 1461, and 1473 (collectively, the 871(m) regulations) were published in T.D. 9734 addressing the treatment of dividend equivalents from U.S. sources. Section 871(m) treats “dividend equivalent” payments as U.S. source dividends for purposes of chapters 3 and 4 and sections 871(a), 881, and 4948(a). As a result, dividend equivalent payments are amounts subject to withholding (as defined in § 1.1441–2(a)) for purposes of sections 1441 through 1443 and withholdable payments (as defined in § 1.1473–1(a)) for purposes of sections 1471 and 1472. Accordingly, a withholding agent generally is required to deduct and withhold a tax equal to 30 percent on any dividend equivalent payment unless an exception from, or lower rate of, withholding applies.

(A) In general . This Notice proposes new provisions to the QI agreement that will permit a QI that is an eligible entity to act as a qualified derivatives dealer (QDD) and provides the requirements and obligations that will apply to a QDD. When a QDD provides a valid withholding certificate to a withholding agent, the withholding agent will not be required to withhold on certain payments made to the QDD when the QDD is acting as a principal (that is, not as an intermediary). Under the proposed QI agreement, these payments are payments with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions (as defined in § 1.871–15(a)(12)) and payments with respect to underlying securities (as defined in § 1.871–15(a)(15)). The requirements and obligations applicable to QDDs will be effective for QDDs when they enter into QI agreements after the proposed QI agreement in this Notice is finalized (with effective dates on or after January 1, 2017).

(B) Requirements and scope of QDD status . To be a QDD, an entity must enter into a QI agreement and be an eligible entity. Pursuant to § 1.1441–1T(e)(6)(ii), a QI is an “eligible entity” if it is one of the three following types of entities: (1) a dealer in securities that is subject to reg

ulatory supervision as a dealer by a governmental authority in the jurisdiction in which it is organized or operates; (2) a bank subject to regulatory supervision as a bank by a governmental authority in the jurisdiction in which it is organized or operates and that issues potential section 871(m) transactions to customers and receives dividends or dividend equivalent payments pursuant to potential section 871(m) transactions to hedge those transactions issued to customers; or (3) an entity that is wholly-owned by a bank subject to regulatory supervision as a bank by a governmental authority in the jurisdiction in which it is organized or operates and that issues potential section 871(m) transactions to customers and receives dividends or dividend equivalent payments pursuant to potential section 871(m) transactions to hedge those transactions issued to customers.

If a foreign branch of a U.S. financial institution meets the requirements of an eligible entity, the foreign branch may enter into a QI agreement to act as a QDD. That foreign branch will be permitted to document and report recipients of those payments in reporting pools consistent with the provisions of sections 5 and 8 of the proposed QI agreement and to use the collective refund procedure, if otherwise permitted under section 9.04 of the proposed QI agreement.

Under the proposed QI agreement, a QI may only act as a QDD for payments with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions or underlying securities that it receives and payments with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions that it makes as a principal, whether or not the payments are received or made in its dealer capacity. A QI that acts as a QDD generally will be required to act as a QDD for (a) all payments with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions and underlying securities that it receives as a principal, and (b) all payments with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions that it makes as a principal. However, to the extent the payment received by a QI as a principal is treated as income

1Unless otherwise provided, all citations in this Notice and the QI agreement included in this Notice are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code) and to the Income Tax Regulations thereunder.

Bulletin No. 2016–29 67 July 18, 2016

effectively connected with QI’s trade or business in the United States, then the QI is not allowed to act as a QDD for such payment. Similarly, when a QI makes a payment with respect to a potential section 871(m) transaction that is a deduction properly allocated to the QI’s gross income that is effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business within the United States, that payment may not be included in the QDD’s offsetting payments (as described below) for purposes of determining its “section 871(m) amount” (as defined in section 2.79 of the proposed QI Agreement and described in section 2.01(D), below).

A QI, however, may not act as a QDD when it receives or makes a payment with respect to a potential section 871(m) transaction as an intermediary as opposed to as a principal (for example, when the QI acts as a custodian of a structured note with a payment referencing a dividend of a domestic corporation). As a result, the QI may, but is not required to, act as a QI for those payments. The QI may treat the payments in the same manner as it would other withholdable payments or reportable amounts it receives, and thus it may either act as a QI (and choose whether or not to assume primary withholding responsibility), or it may act as a nonqualified intermediary (NQI) for such payments.

(C) Reporting and withholding respon- sibilities of a QDD . When a QI acts as a QDD, it must assume primary chapters 3 and 4 withholding responsibility and primary Form 1099 reporting and section 3406 backup withholding responsibility for all payments made with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions as a principal. A QDD will be required to withhold on the dividend payment date for the applicable dividend. If a QDD makes any payment with respect to a potential section 871(m) transaction that is not a dividend equivalent payment but is an amount subject to chapter 3 or 4 withholding or a reportable payment, the QDD must also assume primary chapters 3 and 4 withholding responsibility and primary Form 1099 reporting and section 3406 backup withholding responsibility for all of those payments. Under the proposed QI agreement, a QDD’s reporting responsibilities also include specific payee (rather than pooled) reporting on Form 1042–S,

Foreign Person’s U.S. Source Income Subject to Withholding, for payments to other QDDs to which the QDD makes a payment of an amount subject to chapter 3 withholding.

Among the other information reporting obligations described in sections 7 and 8 of the proposed QI agreement, a QDD will be required to report on separate Forms 1042–S the amount of qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payments (as defined in section 2.70 of the proposed QI agreement and described in section 2.01(D), below) that represent (a) the aggregate amount of payments made to a United States person that would be dividend equivalent payments if made to a person who was not a United States person (as described in section 2.70(A)(1) of the proposed QI agreement); and (b) the aggregate amount of payments of effectively connected income (as described in section 2.70(A)(2) of the proposed QI agreement). In addition, a QDD will be required to provide specific information (for example, name, address, and U.S. TIN) upon request of the IRS about U.S. nonexempt recipients that receive qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payments described in section 2.70(A)(1) of the proposed QI agreement. To the extent necessary, a QDD must obtain a waiver from each U.S. non-exempt recipient described in the preceding sentence of any limitation on providing such information to the IRS. If the QDD does not obtain a waiver or collect and maintain such information about a U.S. non-exempt recipient, any payment made to that U.S. non-exempt recipient is not a qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payment. A QI will be required to report these payments in a pool on a separate Form 1042–S. The maintenance of such information by QDDs will assist the IRS in ensuring the compliance of these U.S. non-exempt recipients with their reporting of income associated with these transactions and of QDDs with their obligations under the QI agreement.

(D) Tax liability of a QDD . A QDD (other than a foreign branch of a U.S. financial institution acting as a QDD) must determine and pay any “QDD tax liability.” A QDD tax liability is the sum of a QDD’s liability under sections 871(a) and 881 for (a) its “section 871(m)

amount” (as defined in section 2.79 of the proposed QI agreement); (b) its dividends that are not on underlying securities associated with potential section 871(m) transactions and its dividend equivalent payments received as a QDD in its non-dealer capacity; and (c) any other U.S. source FDAP payments received as a QDD with respect to potential section 871(m) transactions or underlying securities that are not dividend or dividend equivalent payments. For purposes of determining the QDD tax liability, payments received by a QDD acting as a proprietary trader are treated as payments received in its nondealer capacity, while transactions properly reflected in a QDD’s dealer book are presumed to be held by a dealer in its dealer capacity. For purposes of determining the QDD tax liability, dealer activity is limited to its activity as a derivatives dealer.

Even though a QDD may act as a QDD for payments received in a non-dealer capacity, only payments made and received in its dealer capacity may be used for purposes of calculating its section 871(m) amount. In its dealer capacity, a QDD may hold underlying securities that are associated with potential section 871(m) transactions. An underlying security is associated with a potential section 871(m) transaction when the QDD holds that underlying security to manage the risk of price changes with respect to a potential section 871(m) transaction that the QDD entered into in the normal course of its business as a dealer. If a QDD holds stock in its non-dealer capacity (for example, as a proprietary trader), the QDD cannot treat that stock as an underlying security associated with a potential section 871(m) transaction for purposes of calculating its section 871(m) amount.

A QDD remains liable for tax on any dividends and dividend equivalents it receives in its dealer capacity to the extent the QDD is not contractually obligated to make offsetting payments that reference the same dividend or dividend equivalent that it received as a dealer. To determine its tax liability on dividends and dividend equivalents that it receives, a QDD may aggregate all dividends on underlying securities associated with potential section 871(m) transactions and dividend equivalent payments that it receives that refer

July 18, 2016 68 Bulletin No. 2016–29

ence the same dividend and all dividend equivalent payments that it is contractually obligated to make as a dealer that reference the same dividend. Transactions properly reflected in a QDD’s dealer book are presumed to be held by the QDD in its dealer capacity for purposes of determining the QDD’s tax liability. The net amount of the payments received and the offsetting payments made is referred to as the QDD’s “section 871(m) amount.” See section 2.79 of the proposed QI agreement. Under the proposed QI agreement, the amount of offsetting payments includes any dividend equivalent payment and any qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payment that the QDD makes or is contractually obligated to make with respect to the same dividend. A “qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payment” is defined in section 2.70 of the proposed QI agreement as (a) any payment made or contractually obligated to be made to a United States person that would be a dividend equivalent payment if made to a person who was not a United States person and (b) any payment made to a foreign person that would be a dividend equivalent payment if the payment were not treated as income effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business. As discussed in section 2.01(C), above, to the extent a QDD does not obtain a waiver from a U.S. nonexempt recipient of a payment described in (a) in the preceding sentence of any limitation on providing its name, address, and TIN (if any) to the IRS and does not collect and maintain such information, payments made to that U.S. non-exempt recipient are not qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payments.

A QDD will report its QDD tax liability on a Form 1042, Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Persons . The QDD’s payment and deposit requirements with respect to any taxes due with respect to its QDD tax liability on Form 1042 are described in sections 3.08 and 3.09(C) of the proposed QI agreement. When a foreign branch of a U.S. financial institution acts as a QDD, the branch is not required to report a QDD tax liability for income relating to potential section 871(m) transactions and underlying securities on Form 1042. Instead, the U.S. financial institution must file the

appropriate U.S. income tax return (for example, Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return ) for the tax year covered by the QI agreement to report and pay its tax liability under chapter 1.

(E) Accounts for purposes of section 871(m) transactions . Generally, an “account” for purposes of the QI agreement means any account for which QI acts as a qualified intermediary. See section 2.01 of the proposed QI agreement. QIs and taxpayers, however, do not always hold section 871(m) transactions in an account relationship. Section 2.01 of the proposed QI agreement therefore defines “account,” when applied to a QI acting as a QDD, as any potential section 871(m) transaction or underlying security where the QI receives payments as a principal and any potential section 871(m) transaction where the QI makes payments as a principal. However, section 5 of the proposed QI agreement does not require a QI that is acting as a QDD to document each account; rather it limits a QDD’s obligation to document only an account holder of an account to which the QDD makes a reportable payment or qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payment (or payment that otherwise would have been a qualifying dividend equivalent offsetting payment but for the QDD’s failure to obtain a waiver or collect and maintain information about a U.S. non-exempt recipient account holder as required by section 8.03(C) of the proposed QI agreement). (F) Qualified securities lenders . Once implemented, the QDD regime is intended to replace the qualified securities lender (QSL) regime described in Notice 2010– 46, 2010–25 I.R.B. 757. The proposed QI agreement will require a QI to act as a QDD for all securities lending and salerepurchase transactions the QDD enters into that are section 871(m) transactions, in addition to acting as a QDD for payments with respect to other potential section 871(m) transactions and underlying securities as a principal. All securities lending and sale-repurchase transactions the QI enters into that are section 871(m) transactions will be deemed to be entered into by the QI as a principal and therefore within the QDD regime. Until the QDD regime is implemented, the QSL rules (including the credit-forward rules described in Notice 2010–46) will continue to apply

for substitute dividend payments made pursuant to a securities lending or a salerepurchase transaction. For more information about the QSL regime, see Notice 2010–46. (G) Coordination with 871(m) regula- tions . The Treasury Department (Treasury) and the IRS intend to modify, to the extent necessary, the section 871(m) regulations to coordinate with provisions of the QI agreement relevant to the requirements of QDDs and withholding agents making payments to QDDs (as those provisions are finalized).

.02 Periodic Review and Certifications of Compliance .

(A) In general . The 2014 QI agreement replaced the previous external audit requirement with an internal compliance and review program. As part of this compliance program, the responsible officer is required to make periodic compliance certifications and provide certain factual information to the IRS. After the 2014 QI agreement was issued, commentators raised concerns about the administrability of the compliance review procedures, including potential costs of implementing and conducting a compliance program, difficulties in allocating resources to conduct the periodic review in the last year of the certification period, and the lack of detailed standards for performance of the QI’s periodic review similar to those provided in Rev. Proc. 2002–55, 2002–2 C.B. 435. Under the proposed QI agreement, a QI’s responsible officer will still be required to make a periodic certification of internal controls as described in section 10.03 and Appendix I of the proposed QI agreement. In making this certification, the responsible officer may rely on, in addition to the results of the periodic review, any other processes or reviews that the responsible officer has determined are necessary in order to make the certification. This allows the responsible officer to decide, for example, whether to hire an external reviewer (for example, a law firm or accounting firm) and what the scope of the engagement should be (for example, whether the external reviewer will conduct a review of the sufficiency of the QI’s internal controls or whether the re

Bulletin No. 2016–29 69 July 18, 2016

view will be limited to the periodic review discussed below). The responsible officer must, however, document what he or she has relied upon in making the certification and retain such documentation for the same period of time for which the compliance review report and certifications are required to be retained pursuant to section 10.06(D) of the proposed QI agreement. For example, if the responsible officer relies on an internal or external reviewer to conduct a review of the internal controls and systems, the responsible officer must retain any report delivered by the reviewer.

In addition to making the certification of internal controls, the QI is required to report certain factual information (described in Appendix I) regarding its documentation, withholding, reporting, and other obligations under the QI agreement, and, in the case of a QI that is acting as a QDD, certain information related to the determination of its QDD tax liability (as described in section 3.09 of the proposed QI agreement). This factual information will be gathered, in part, through the testing of accounts and transactions required as part of the periodic review, as described in sections 10.04 and 10.05 of the proposed QI agreement. This review will be focused on the testing of accounts and transactions rather than a substantive evaluation of the sufficiency of a QI’s policies and procedures. Section 10.05(A) through (E) of the proposed QI agreement provides the objectives for performing the review, and Appendix I to the proposed QI agreement describes the factual information that will be required to be reported to the IRS upon completion of the review. In order to allow QIs to have some flexibility in determining how to satisfy the objectives for the review, the IRS does not intend to publish a step-by-step audit plan as was previously provided in Rev. Proc. 2002–55, but the QI is expected to create a step–by-step plan to satisfy the objectives for the review contained in section 10.05(A) through (E) of the proposed QI agreement and to provide the required factual information. In response to comments requesting a safe harbor method for determining a sample of accounts for the periodic review, this Notice provides a stratified statistical sampling methodology in Appendix II to the proposed QI agree

ment. In addition, the proposed QI agreement requires that a QI that has 50 accounts or more review at least 50 accounts as part of the periodic review. If a QI has fewer than 50 accounts, it must review all of its accounts and is not allowed to use the sampling procedures in Appendix II to the proposed QI agreement.

In addition, section 10 of the proposed QI agreement has been clarified to prevent unintended inferences that the periodic review must satisfy the standards of a financial audit or other attestation engagement of a certified public accountant. References to an “auditor” (in all contexts, whether internal or external) have been replaced with “reviewer.” The description of the standard of independence required of a reviewer has also been clarified. The responsible officer can arrange for the review to be conducted by either an external or an internal reviewer to the extent provided in the proposed QI agreement. In either case, the reviewer must have sufficient independence to objectively conduct the review. For example, a reviewer, whether internal or external, cannot be reviewing his or her own work (for example, systems he or she designed or documentation he or she validated).

(B) Waiver . Under certain circumstances, section 10.07 of the proposed QI agreement allows a QI that is a foreign financial institution (FFI) that is not acting as a QDD and that is not part of a consolidated compliance group to apply for and obtain a waiver of the requirement to conduct the periodic review and to provide some of the factual information specified in Appendix I to the proposed QI agreement. In cases where the QI applies for a waiver, it is still required to provide certain factual information along with its periodic certification. This information is provided in Appendix I to the proposed QI agreement.

(C) Periodic review timing . The 2014 QI agreement required that the periodic review be conducted for the last year of the certification period. In response to comments regarding potential difficulties with this requirement, including resource constraints with all QIs needing to conduct periodic reviews at the same time, the proposed QI agreement allows a QI to choose which year in the certification period to select for its periodic review. How

ever, if a QI is also acting as a QDD, it must use 2017 for its periodic review for the initial certification period because QDD status is not applicable for 2015 and 2016. (D) Compliance obligations and initial certification date . A QI that had a QI agreement under Rev. Proc. 2000–12, 2000–1 C.B. 387, (as amended) in effect prior to June 30, 2014, with an audit cycle that would have extended past June 30, 2014, is not required to complete an audit under the previous QI agreement (Rev. Proc. 2000–12). A QI with a 2014 QI agreement in effect on or after June 30, 2014, must comply with the compliance obligations under that agreement as revised in the QI agreement in effect after December 31, 2016.

For purposes of determining the certification period, the initial certification period is the period ending on the third full calendar year that the 2014 QI agreement and any superseding revenue procedure is in effect. Therefore, a QI with a QI agreement with an effective date of June 30, 2014, must treat the initial certification period as ending on December 31, 2017, and will be required to make the required certification on or before July 1, 2018, pursuant to the requirements of the QI agreement in effect after December 31, 2016. (E) FATCA requirements . As part of the QI agreement, a QI that is an FFI is required to comply with the FATCA requirements applicable to its chapter 4 status as a participating FFI, registered deemed-compliant FFI, or registered deemed-compliant Model 1 IGA FFI, and a QI that is a non-financial foreign entity (NFFE) acting on behalf of its shareholders is required to comply with the requirements of a direct reporting NFFE. In addition the proposed QI agreement clarifies that the QI’s responsible officer can rely on other personnel with oversight or responsibility for the QI’s FATCA requirements as a participating FFI, registered deemed-compliant FFI, or registered deemed-compliant Model 1 IGA FFI (as defined in section 2.28 of the proposed QI agreement) or its requirements as a direct reporting NFFE or sponsoring entity, as applicable, in making its certifications relating to its FATCA obligations. In conducting the periodic review, a QI’s re

July 18, 2016 70 Bulletin No. 2016–29

quirements relating to its FATCA compliance are limited to those accounts for which it is acting as a QI.

(F) Consolidated compliance program . The compliance procedure described in the 2014 QI agreement included an allowance for a QI to be a member of a consolidated compliance program under the supervision of a “compliance QI,” subject to the approval of the IRS. In order to establish a consolidated compliance program, the responsible officer of the compliance QI should consult the Financial Intermediaries Team at the address in section 12.06 of the proposed QI agreement to determine if the proposed consolidated compliance program is acceptable. If statistical sampling is to be utilized for the periodic review and testing of accounts and transactions, a sample plan should also be proposed. In evaluating the consolidated compliance program request, the goal of the Financial Intermediaries Team is to have an open dialogue concerning any issues that may materially affect a QI’s ability to fulfill its responsibilities under the QI agreement. If a QI is part of a consolidated compliance program under section 10.02(B) of the proposed QI agreement that is approved by the IRS, the compliance QI will be required to provide factual information for each QI member of the group separately but can make the certification of internal controls for the entire consolidated compliance group.

.03 Limited FFIs and Limited Branches . Pursuant to the regulations under chapter 4, as modified by Notice 2015–66, 2015–41 I.R.B. 541, limited FFI (and limited branch) status will no longer be available as of January 1, 2017. Accordingly, to conform with the regulations and Notice 2015–66, the proposed QI agreement removes limited FFI as a category of entity eligible to enter into the QI agreement.

.04 Substitute Interest . Comments requested that, as the QSL regime is incorporated into the QDD regime, consideration be given to covering payments of substitute interest on debt securities under the QI agreement in addition to substitute dividend payments. In response, the proposed QI agreement allows a QI to assume primary chapters 3 and 4 withholding responsibility and primary Form 1099 reporting and backup withholding responsibility for payments of interest and sub

stitute interest it receives in connection with a sale-repurchase or similar agreement, a securities lending transaction, or collateral that it holds in connection with its activities as a securities dealer. This will allow a QI to provide a Form W–8IMY, Certificate of Foreign Interme- diary, Foreign Flow-Through Entity, or Certain U.S. Branches for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting, to a withholding agent certifying that the QI is a QI assuming primary withholding responsibility without requiring the QI to distinguish between these payments of interest and substitute interest the QI receives as a principal and those that it receives as an intermediary. QIs that assume primary withholding responsibility for payments of interest and substitute interest as described in this paragraph will be required to assume primary withholding responsibility for all such payments.

.05 Partnerships or Trusts Applying the Joint Account or Agency Options . In response to comments received on the 2014 QI agreement, sections 4.05(A)(1) and 4.06(A)(2) of the proposed QI agreement have been modified to allow a QI to apply the joint account or agency option to partnerships or trusts that are covered as accounts that are excluded from the definition of financial accounts under Annex II of an applicable IGA or under § 1.1471–5(a). In addition, consistent with the WP and WT agreements, a QI can apply the joint account or agency option to partnerships or trusts that are ownerdocumented FFIs with respect to the QI.

.06 Limitation on Benefits for Treaty Claims . In order to enhance and make more robust claims for a reduced rate of chapter 3 withholding under an income tax treaty, Treasury and the IRS intend to modify the chapter 3 regulations to require withholding agents to collect certain information and certifications regarding a beneficial owner’s claim for treaty benefits. Form W–8BEN-E, Certificate of Sta- tus of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting (Entities), was revised in April 2016 to include checkboxes for a beneficial owner to provide information regarding the limitation on benefits provision of an applicable treaty that it satisfies, and Form 1042–S was revised in 2016 to include a line for a withholding agent to report the corre

sponding limitation on benefits provision code. The proposed QI agreement modifies the requirements for a QI using documentary evidence to document an entity account holder claiming a reduced rate of withholding under an income tax treaty to require the collection of information regarding limitation on benefits on the treaty statement provided by the account holder. A QI opening an account or obtaining documentation for an entity account holder on or after January 1, 2017, will be required to collect this limitation on benefits information. For QIs with preexisting entity accounts (as described in section 5.10(A) of the proposed QI agreement) that were documented with documentary evidence, there will be a two-year transition period provided for the collection of the appropriate limitation on benefits information (unless there is a change in circumstances that requires the QI to obtain corrected information). For QIs that documented entity accounts with Forms W–8, those forms may be relied up on until their normal expiration period (unless there is a change in circumstances that requires QI to obtain corrected information). Under the proposed QI agreement, a withholding agent will be subject to an actual knowledge standard with respect to the limitation on benefits claims. The chapter 3 regulations also will be similarly amended to apply an actual knowledge standard for limitation on benefits claims.

.07 Validation of Treaty Claims . In addition to the standard of knowledge for limitation on benefits claims discussed in section 2.06 of this Notice, the proposed QI agreement provides that a QI will be considered to have reason to know that a claim for treaty benefits is unreliable or incorrect if the account holder claims benefits under a treaty that does not exist or is not in force and thus is not included on the list maintained at https://www.irs. gov/businesses/international-businesses/ united-states-income-tax-treaties-a-to-z . This reason to know rule will generally apply to pre-existing accounts for which the QI already holds valid documentation only upon a change in circumstances. For a pre-existing entity account, this reason to know rule will also apply when the QI obtains a written limitation on benefits statement. For purposes of applying this

Bulletin No. 2016–29 71 July 18, 2016

rule, a “pre-existing account” or “preexisting entity account” is an account for which QI holds valid documentation prior to January 1, 2017, for a QI with a QI agreement in effect prior to that date. For a QI that did not have a QI agreement in effect prior to January 1, 2017, it means an account maintained (and for which QI has valid documentation) prior to the effective date of its QI agreement. For all new accounts, the reason-to-know rule will apply upon account opening. The chapter 3 regulations will be amended to include this reason to know rule for all withholding agents.

.08 Conforming Changes and Correc- tion of Errors . In addition to the changes described in this Notice, additional changes have been made in the proposed QI agreement that either correct minor errors, further clarify the current rule, conform to changes made in the WP and WT agreements, or make conforming changes consistent with changes addressed in other guidance or other IRS correspondence (for example, e-mails from the IRS to subscribing QIs). An example of a correction is the presumption rules described in section 5.13(C)(3) of the proposed QI agreement which have been modified to include U.S. source bank deposit interest not subject to chapter 4 withholding (as well as payments on certain short-term obligations) among those payments that a QI is required to treat as made to a U.S. non-exempt recipient account holder under the presumption rules. The application of this presumption rule to such bank deposit interest was inadvertently omitted in the 2014 QI agreement and is expected to apply only in limited cases. For the portion of calendar years 2014–2016 that a QI had in effect a 2014 QI agreement, the QI will not be treated as non-compliant if it does not apply the corrected presumption rule from the proposed QI agreement.

In addition, consistent with the definitions provided in the chapter 3 regulations, the definition of U.S. person in section 2.91 of the proposed QI agreement has been clarified for certain individuals who are dual-resident taxpayers.

.09 Effective Date . When the proposed QI agreement provided in section 4 of this Notice is finalized, it will be effective on or after January 1, 2017. The effective date of the proposed QI agreement for an

applicant will depend on when the QI submits its application and whether the QI has received any reportable payments prior to when it submits its application. Beginning on January 1, 2017, a prospective QI that applies for QI status prior to March 31 of a calendar year, if approved, will have a QI agreement with an effective date of January 1 of that year. If a prospective QI applies for QI status after March 31 of a calendar year and has not received a reportable payment prior to the date it applies for QI status, if approved, it will have a QI agreement with an effective date of January 1 of that year. If a prospective QI applies for QI status after March 31 and has received a reportable payment prior to the date it applies, if approved, its QI agreement will have an effective date of the first of the month in which its QI application is approved and the prospective QI is issued a QI-EIN. A QI that seeks to renew its QI agreement must renew prior to March 31, 2017, and the renewed QI agreement shall have an effective date of January 1, 2017.

.10 Term of the QI Agreement . The proposed QI agreement would expire, unless otherwise terminated, at the end of the third full calendar year the agreement is in effect.

.11 Changes to the WP and WT Agree- ments . The proposed changes to requirements for the QI compliance review previewed in this Notice are also intended, with appropriate modifications, to be incorporated in a revised withholding foreign partnership agreement (WP agreement) and withholding foreign trust agreement (WT agreement), revising the WP agreement and WT agreement published in Rev. Proc. 2014–47. Treasury and the IRS will publish the revised WP agreement and WT agreement with these revisions and a limited number of corrections to the WP agreement and WT agreement (as published in Rev. Proc. 2014– 47), to be effective on or after January 1, 2017. Beginning January 1, 2017, the WP agreement will also provide the requirements for a reverse hybrid entity that desires to enter into a WP agreement with respect to the requirements for documenting and withholding on owners claiming treaty benefits. These requirements include that such entity meet all of its filing requirements as a corporation for U.S. tax

purposes; prepare and provide for certain interest holders that are U.S. persons a Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Annual Information Statement (described in § 1.1295–1(g)(1)) (if the WP is a PFIC for the year); and prepare and retain for IRS review a reconciliation statement showing the amount of U.S. source FDAP income allocated to each direct or indirect owner of the WP that claims treaty benefits during the calendar year. This is to eliminate the need for the riders that have been used previously for such entities to enter into WP agreements.

Treasury and the IRS request comments on an allowance for consolidated periodic reviews and certifications for WPs that are FFIs, similar to what is permitted for QIs. Treasury and the IRS will consider, if adopted, whether this option would only be available to WPs that, for chapter 4 purposes, should be considered sponsored FFIs under a sponsoring entity that implements a compliance program that includes uniform practices, procedures, and systems, subject to uniform monitoring and control, with respect to all WPs for which it acts. If this consolidated review approach is adopted, it is anticipated that the sponsoring entity for purposes of the WP agreement would be jointly liable (with the WP) for any liability of the WP for failing to withhold and report as required under the WP agreement. In addition, if this approach is adopted, the chapter 4 regulations will be amended to allow a WP to be a sponsored FFI to the extent provided in the revised WP agreement and to register under the sponsoring entity.