Skip to content

Introduction

SECTION 6. DRAFTING

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2014-13 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

INFORMATION

The principal author of this revenue procedure is Ken Cohen of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). For further information regarding this revenue procedure contact Mr. Cohen on (202) 317-6848 (not a toll-free number).

Maximum Vehicle Values for 2014 for Use of Vehicle Cents-Per-Mile and Fleet- Average Valuation Rules

Notice 2014–11

This notice provides the maximum vehicle values for 2014 that taxpayers need to determine the value of personal use of employer-provided vehicles under the special valuation rules provided under section 1.61–21 (d) and (e) of the Income Tax Regulations.

MAXIMUM VEHICLE VALUES

The maximum value of employerprovided vehicles first made available to employees for personal use in calendar year 2014 for which the vehicle cents-permile valuation rule provided under Regulation section 1.61–21(e) may be applicable is $16,000 for a passenger automobile and $17,300 for a truck or van.

The maximum value of employerprovided vehicles first made available to employees for personal use in calendar year 2014 for which the fleet-average valuation rule provided under Regulation section 1.61–21(d) may be applicable is $21,300 for a passenger automobile and $22,600 for a truck or van.

EFFECTIVE DATE

This notice applies to employer provided passenger automobiles first made available to employees for personal use in calendar year 2014.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice is Don M. Parkinson of the Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt & Government Entities). For further information on this notice contact Don Parkinson on (202) 317-4766 (not a toll-free number).

March 24, 2014 880 Bulletin No. 2014–13

Application of Section 871(m) to Specified Equity- Linked Instruments

Notice 2014–14

I. Background

On December 5, 2013, a withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking, notice of proposed rulemaking, and notice of public hearing were published in the Federal Register at 78 FR 73128 (2013) (the “2013 proposed regulations”). The 2013 proposed regulations proposed new rules for determining whether a transaction is subject to tax pursuant to section 871(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Generally, section 871(m)(1) provides that a dividend equivalent is treated as a dividend from sources within the United States for purposes of sections 871(a), 881, 4948(a), and chapters 3 and 4. The proposed regulations provide that a dividend equivalent includes any payment pursuant to a specified notional principal contract (“specified NPC”) or a specified equity-linked instrument (“specified ELI”) that references the payment of a dividend from an underlying security, each as defined in the 2013 proposed regulations. An ELI, however, is only a specified ELI under the 2013 proposed regulations if the long party acquired it on or after March 5, 2014.

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) have received comments recommending that an ELI issued prior to January 1, 2016, not be treated as a specified ELI or, alternatively, that an ELI not be treated as a specified ELI if it is issued prior to the date that the final regulations are published. Comments note that the 2013 proposed regulations significantly expanded the scope of ELIs that would be subject to tax pursuant to section 871(m). Comments further note that this expansion will create uncertainty in pricing transactions today and will not give market participants sufficient time to implement the systems necessary to track the information required by the 2013 proposed regulations by March 5, 2014.

II. Amendment to the Term “Specified ELI” in Final Regulations

When § 1.871–15(e) of the 2013 proposed regulations is finalized, the Treasury Department and the Service intend to limit specified ELIs to ELIs issued on or after 90 days after the date of publication of the final regulations.

III. Effective Date

This Notice is effective March 4, 2014.

IV. Effect on Other Documents

This Notice announces the intention of Treasury and the Service to modify Prop. Reg. § 1.871–15(e) as published in the Federal Register 78 FR 73128 (2013) when the Treasury Decision adopting those rules as final regulations is published in the Federal Register.

V. Request for Comments

The Treasury Department and the Service invite comments on the change to the 2013 proposed regulations described in this Notice. Comments on this Notice may be submitted along with comments to the 2013 proposed regulations. To provide written or electronic comments, send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG– 120282–10), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–120282–10), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically, via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–120282–10).

The principal authors of this Notice are D. Peter Merkel and Karen Walny of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). For further information regarding this notice call (202) 317-6938 (not a toll-free number).

Per Capita Distributions of Funds Held in Trust by the Secretary of the Interior

Notice 2014–17

This notice provides interim guidance concerning the federal income tax treatment of per capita distributions made to members of Indian tribes from funds held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior.

The Internal Revenue Service (Service) and the Treasury Department are issuing this notice to allow Indian tribes to review the interim guidance and provide comments prior to the issuance of final guidance. Comments may be submitted in writing on or before September 17, 2014. Comments should be submitted to Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2014–17), Room 5203, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044, or electronically to notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov. Please include “Notice 2014–17” in the subject line of any electronic communications. Alternatively, comments may be hand delivered between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday to Friday to CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2014–17), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. All comments will be available for public inspection and copying.

BACKGROUND

The Department of the Interior (DOI), primarily through the Office of Special Trustee (OST), is responsible for holding in trust certain funds on behalf of individual Indians and federally recognized Indian tribes.

Current DOI regulations under 25 C.F.R. §§ 115.700–701 provide that funds may be accepted by the Secretary of the Interior on behalf of federally recognized Indian tribes and certain individual Indians who have an interest in trust lands, trust resources, or trust assets. Funds accepted on behalf of Indian tribes are deposited into tribal “Trust Accounts” as defined at 25 C.F.R. § 115.002. The OST has the responsibility to manage the funds and make them available to the tribe upon request.

Bulletin No. 2014–13 881 March 24, 2014

Funds held in tribal Trust Accounts by the DOI may be distributed per capita to members of the tribes. Prior to the enactment of the Per Capita Act, Pub. L. No. 98–64, 97 Stat. 365, 25 U.S.C. §§ 117a– 117c, in 1983, the DOI had the sole authority for making per capita distributions out of tribal Trust Accounts. However, the Per Capita Act provided Indian tribes authority to make per capita distributions directly to members of the tribe out of the tribe’s Trust Account.

CONSULTATION

In the spirit of Executive Order 13175, representatives of the Service and the Treasury Department consulted with tribal leaders and members of Indian tribes concerning the federal income tax treatment of per capita distributions made to Indian tribal members from funds held in tribal Trust Accounts. These consultations and conversations were extremely useful in preparing this notice.

APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW

Section 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 61, states that, except as otherwise provided by law, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including but not limited to compensation, gross income derived from business, and dividends. Under 26 U.S.C. § 61, Congress intends to tax all gains and undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, over which taxpayers have complete dominion. Commis- sioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955), 1955–1 C.B. 207. Indians are U.S. citizens subject to the requirement to pay income taxes. Squire v. Capoeman, 351 U.S. 1 (1956), 1956–1 C.B. 605. There is no provision in the Internal Revenue Code that exempts an individual from the payment of federal income tax solely because he or she is an Indian. Therefore, exemption of Indians from the payment of tax must derive plainly from treaties or agreements with the Indian tribes concerned or an act of Congress. See Rev. Rul. 67–284, 1967–2 C.B. 55.

The Per Capita Act provides authority to Indian tribes to make per capita distributions to members of the tribe out of

funds held in a tribal Trust Account. Under 25 U.S.C. § 117a, funds subject to that section may be distributed by either the Secretary of the Interior or, at the request of the governing body of the tribe and subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, the tribe. In practice, proceeds from trust assets or trust resources (both defined at 25 C.F.R. § 115.002) are deposited into a tribal Trust Account for a tribe and that tribe subsequently makes a per capita distribution using funds from that Trust Account.

The Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use or Distribution Act, Pub. L. No. 93–134, 87 Stat 466, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1401–1408, concerns the distribution of certain judgment funds to Indian tribes. Under 25 U.S.C. § 117b(a), per capita distributions made pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 117a are subject to the provisions of 25 U.S.C. § 1407. Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 1407, none of the funds that are distributed per capita or held in trust pursuant to a plan approved under 25 U.S.C. § 1401 et. seq, including all interest and investment income accrued on the funds while held in trust, are subject to federal income taxes. See also H.R. Rep. No. 98–230 at 3 (1983), which provides that per capita distributions of tribal trust revenue “shall be subject to the provisions of [25 U.S.C. § 1407] with respect to tax exemptions.” However, per capita distributions to tribal members of “net revenues” from Indian gaming activity that are subject to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (net gaming revenues) are subject to federal income taxation and are subject to the information reporting and withholding requirements of 26 U.S.C. §§ 6041 and 3402(r). See 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721 and 25 C.F.R. Part 290. Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, net gaming revenues means “gross revenues of an Indian gaming activity less amounts paid out as, or paid for, prizes and total operating expenses, excluding management fees.” 25 U.S.C. § 2703(9).

Under 25 C.F.R. § 115.703, the Secretary of the Interior accepts and deposits into tribal Trust Accounts only funds from sources listed in the table in 25 C.F.R. § 115.702. The 25 C.F.R. § 115.702 table provides that the Secretary of the Interior will accept, among other payments, payments resulting from money directly de

rived from title conveyance or use of trust lands, payments resulting from penalties for trespass on trust lands, and payments resulting from a final order from a court of competent jurisdiction for a cause of action related to trust assets. The Secretary of the Interior also accepts deposits of funds derived directly from trust lands, restricted fee lands, or trust resources. See 25 C.F.R. § 115.702 for a full list of funds that the Secretary of the Interior accepts and deposits into tribal Trust Accounts.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF PER CAPITA DISTRIBUTIONS OF TRIBAL TRUST ACCOUNT FUNDS

a. General Rule

Under 25 U.S.C. § 117b(a) and 25 U.S.C. § 1407, per capita distributions made from funds the Secretary of the Interior holds in a Trust Account for the benefit of a tribe are generally excluded from the gross income of the members of the tribe receiving the per capita distributions. For example, if proceeds from timber sales, an agricultural lease, or a grazing permit are deposited into a tribe’s Trust Account and that tribe subsequently makes a per capita distribution using funds from the Trust Account, the per capita distributions are excluded from the tribal members’ gross income.

b. Exception

Distributions to tribal members from a tribal Trust Account constitute gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 61 to the members of the tribe receiving the distributions if a Trust Account is used to mischaracterize taxable income as nontaxable per capita distributions. For example, distributions from a tribal Trust Account constitute gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 61 if based on the facts and circumstances the distributions are mischaracterized compensation to tribal members for their services, mischaracterized distributions of business profits, or mischaracterized gaming revenues.

The following examples illustrate situations in which distributions from a tribal Trust Account are not treated as nontaxable per capita distributions and are included in gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 61.

March 24, 2014 882 Bulletin No. 2014–13

Example 1 - Mischaracterized Compensation B is a housing authority established by Tribe C, a federally recognized Indian tribe. The Director and the Assistant Director of B are both members of Tribe C. During each of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 taxable years, the Director and the Assistant Director are each paid bonuses in the amount of $15x. In the 2014 taxable year, members of Tribe C’s Tribal Council authorize per capita distributions out of the tribe’s Trust Account in the amount of $1x to every member of the tribe and an additional $2x in per capita distributions to every elder in the tribe. In addition, the members of Tribe C’s Tribal Council authorize distributions out of the Trust Account to the Director and Assistant Director in the amount of $15x each, instead of paying bonuses to the Director and the Assistant Director. The distributions of $15x to the Director and the Assistant Director are mischaracterized compensation and, therefore, are included in their gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 61.

Example 2 - Mischaracterized Distributions of Business Profits

Tribe D is a federally recognized Indian tribe. A group of Tribe D members own Corporation E, an information technology company that provides call center services. Corporation E’s headquarters is located on land held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior for the benefit of Tribe D. Tribe D charges Corporation E rent at fair market value for its headquarters. However, the lease agreement with Tribe D includes a provision whereby Corporation E deposits an amount approximating its net revenues into Tribe

D’s Trust Account, characterizing the revenue as additional rent. Subsequently, members of Tribe D’s Tribal Council authorize per capita distributions out of the Trust Account in an aggregate amount equal to the purported “additional rent” to the group of Tribe D members who own Corporation E. The distributions of the mischaracterized business profits from the Trust Account constitute gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 61 to the members receiving the distributions.

Example 3 - Mischaracterized Gaming Revenues Tribe F is a federally recognized Indian tribe. Tribe F owns all of Corporation G, which owns and operates a casino located on land held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior for the benefit of Tribe F. All of Corporation G’s gaming revenues are subject to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Corporation G distributes 50% of its net gaming revenues to Tribe F. Under a lease agreement with Tribe F, Corporation G deposits the remaining 50% of its net gaming revenues into Tribe F’s Trust Account, characterizing the deposits as rent for use of the land for the casino. Subsequently, members of Tribe F’s Tribal Council authorize per capita distributions to every member of the tribe out of the net gaming revenues that are held in the Trust Account. The distributions out of the Trust Account are mischaracterized gaming revenues. Because per capita distributions of net gaming revenues are subject to federal income taxation, the distributions constitute gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 61 to the members of the tribe receiving the distributions.

LIMITATION

This notice applies only to per capita distributions made by the Secretary of the Interior or an Indian tribe out of a tribal Trust Account, as defined at 25 C.F.R. § 115.002. This notice does not affect the federal income taxation of distributions made from individual Indian trust accounts, from which per capita distributions cannot be made. This notice also does not affect the federal income taxation of and withholding from distributions made pursuant to a Revenue Allocation Plan under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Pub. L. No. 100–497, 102 Stat. 2475, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice is James Martin of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt & Government Entities). For further information, please contact Mr. Martin at (202) 3175800 (not a toll-free number).

Bulletin No. 2014–13 883 March 24, 2014

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2014-13

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.