Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2013-28 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
that the Service did not consider, and no opinion is expressed upon, the no-rule issue. In appropriate cases, notwithstanding the taxpayer’s representation, the Service may decline to issue a letter ruling on such larger transactions due to the relevance of the no-rule issue. Section 2.03 of Rev. Proc. 2013–3, 2013–1 I.R.B 114.
In addition, the Service ordinarily will not issue letter rulings with respect to an issue that is clearly and adequately addressed by statute, regulations, decision of a court, or authority published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin ( i.e., comfort rulings). However, the Service may in its discretion decide to issue a letter ruling on such an issue if the Service is otherwise issuing a letter ruling to the taxpayer on another issue arising in the same transaction. Section 6.11 of Rev. Proc. 2013–1, 2013–1 I.R.B. 17, and section 4.02(9) of Rev. Proc. 2013–3, 2013–1 I.R.B. 123.
.02 Certain Letter Rulings under the Jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
Prior to the effective date of this revenue procedure, the Service would not issue a letter ruling on whether a transaction qualified for nonrecognition treatment under section 332, 351 (except for certain transfers undertaken before section 355 distributions), or 1036, or whether a transaction constituted a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a)(1)(A) (including a transaction that qualified under section 368(a)(1)(A) by reason of section 368(a)(2)(D) or section 368(a)(2)(E)), section 368(a)(1)(B), section 368(a)(1)(C), section 368(a)(1)(E), or section 368(a)(1)(F), or the tax consequences (such as nonrecognition and basis) that resulted from the application of such Code sections, unless the Service determined that there was a significant issue. If the Service determined that there was a significant issue, and to the extent the transaction was not described in another no-rule area, the Service would rule on the entire transaction and not just the significant issue. Section 3.01(41) of Rev. Proc. 2013–3, 2013–1 I.R.B. 116.
In Rev. Proc. 2009–25, 2009–24 I.R.B. 1088, the Service announced a pilot program for letter rulings on issues arising in the context of section 355 distributions. Under this program, a taxpayer could re
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters (Also: Part 1, §§ 332, 351, 355, 368, and 1036)
Rev. Proc. 2013–32
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code