SECTION 4. REQUEST FOR
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2013-24 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
COMMENTS
The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service request public comments on the matters described in Section 3 of this Notice. While comments on any aspect of these matters are welcome, we request comments on the following questions in particular:
- Which corporations are regulated by a Federal or State entity that reviews and makes determinations about worthlessness of debt assets in a manner consistent with the tax standards for worthlessness under section 166, and which of these entities should be covered by revised conclusive presumption rules?
- Should the Conclusive Presumption Regulations be modified to reflect the changes in bank regulatory standards and processes since adoption of the regulations, and if so, how?
- Are the current bank regulatory standards incorporating generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) sufficiently similar to the standard of worthlessness under section 166 that they may appropriately be used in formulating revised conclusive presumption rules?
June 10, 2013 1241 2013–24 I.R.B.
Per Capita Payments from Proceeds of Settlements of Indian Tribal Trust Cases
Notice 2013–36
BACKGROUND
Notice 2013–1, 2013–3 I.R.B. 281, provides guidance on the federal tax treatment
of per capita payments that members of Indian tribes receive from proceeds of certain settlements of tribal trust cases between the United States and those Indian tribes. Additional tribes have settled tribal trust cases against the United States since publication of Notice 2013–1. This notice provides an updated Appendix that reflects the additional settlement agreements.
EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Notice 2013–1 Appendix is modified and superseded.
FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information regarding this notice, please contact Telly Meier at phone number (202) 283–8877 (not a toll-free call).
Appendix Tribes That Have Entered into Settlement Agreements of Tribal Trust Cases
- Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation
- Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
- Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation
- Bois Forte Band of Chippewa
- Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Rancheria
- Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation
- Coeur d’Alene Tribe
- Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
- Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians
- Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
- Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation
- Crow Creek Sioux Tribe
- Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
- Hualapai Indian Tribe
- Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska
- Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of Arizona
- Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas
- Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
- Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
- Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe
- Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Reservation
- Mescalero Apache Tribe
- Minnesota Chippewa Tribe
- Nez Perce Tribe
- Nooksack Indian Tribe
- Northern Cheyenne Tribe of Indians
- Omaha Tribe of Nebraska
- Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine
- Pawnee Nation
- Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation
- Pueblo of Zia
- Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation
- Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians
- Rincon Luiseño Band of Indians
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe
- Round Valley Indian Tribes
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
- Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation
- Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
- Spirit Lake Dakotah Nation
- Spokane Tribe of Indians
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
- Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
- Summit Lake Paiute Tribe
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Community
2013–24 I.R.B. 1242 June 10, 2013
Appendix Tribes That Have Entered into Settlement Agreements of Tribal Trust Cases
- Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians
- Tohono O’odham Nation
- Tulalip Tribes
- Tule River Indian Tribe
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
- Ute Mountain Ute Tribe
- Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska
- Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska
- Tlingit & Haida Tribes of Alaska
- Northwestern Band of Shoshone Indians
- Hoopa Valley Tribe
- Ak-Chin Indian Community
- Oglala Sioux Tribe
- Yoruk Tribe
- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
- Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony
- Seminole Nation of Oklahoma
- Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma
or less of the applicable median family income. Under § 143(f)(6), the income limitation is reduced to 100 percent of the applicable median family income if there are fewer than three individuals in the family of the mortgagor.
.04 Section 143(f)(4) provides that the term “applicable median family income” means the greater of (A) the area median gross income for the area in which the residence is located, or (B) the statewide median gross income for the state in which the residence is located.
.05 Section 143(f)(5) provides for an upward adjustment of the income limitations in certain high housing cost areas. Under § 143(f)(5)(C), a high housing cost area is a statistical area for which the housing cost/income ratio is greater than 1.2. The housing cost/income ratio is determined under § 143(f)(5)(D) by dividing (a) the applicable housing price ratio by (b) the ratio that the area median gross income bears to the median gross income for the United States. The applicable housing price ratio is the new housing price ratio (new housing average purchase price for the area divided by the new housing average purchase price for the United States) or the existing housing price ratio (existing housing average area purchase price divided by the existing housing average purchase price for the United States), whichever results in the housing cost/income ratio being closer to 1. This income adjustment applies only to bonds issued, and nonissued bond amounts elected, after
26 CFR 601.601: Rules and Regulations. (Also Part I, §§ 25, 103, 143; 1.25–4T, 1.103–1, 6a.103A–2.)
Rev. Proc. 2013–27
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code