SECTION 14. PROVISIONS
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2011-44 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
REQUIRED IN EVERY VS PLAN
.01 Anti-Cutback Provisions - VS plans must specifically provide for the protection provided under § 411(a)(10) and (d)(6), to the extent required, in the event that the employer amends the plan in any manner. If a VS plan authorizes the VS practitioner to amend the plan on behalf of employers, the VS practitioner may not amend the plan in a manner that could result in the elimination of a benefit to the extent the benefit is required to be protected under § 411(d)(6) with respect to the plan of any adopting employer, unless permitted to do so under §§ 1.401(a)–4 and 1.411(d)–4. In addition, a VS plan that is not exempt from the top-heavy requirements and that does not contain vesting rules for all years that are at least as favorable to participants as those provided in § 416(b), must specifically provide that any vesting that occurs while the plan is top-heavy will not be cut back if the plan ceases to be top-heavy.
.02 Definition of Employee / § 414(b), (c), (m), (n), and (o) - Each VS plan must include a definition of employee as any employee of the employer maintaining the plan or any other employer aggregated under § 414(b), (c), (m), or (o) and the regulations thereunder. The definition of employee shall also include any individual deemed under § 414(n) (or under regulations under § 414(o)) to be an employee of any employer described in the previous sentence.
.03 Definition of Service / § 414(b), (c), (m), (n), and (o) - Each VS plan must specifically credit all service with any employer aggregated under § 414(b), (c), (m), or (o) and the regulations thereunder as service with the employer maintaining the plan. In addition, in the case of an individual deemed under § 414(n) (or under regulations under § 414(o)) to be the employee of any employer described in the previous sentence, service with such employer must be credited to such individual.
.04 Adopting Employer Modification of Trust or Custodial Account Document
- An employer will not be considered to
October 31, 2011 620 2011–44 I.R.B.
tax consequences may result from loss of the plan’s qualified status, and inform the employer about the availability of EPCRS. See Rev. Proc. 2008–50.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code