Skip to content

Introduction

SECTION 10. EFFECT ON OTHER

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2010-51 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

DOCUMENTS

Rev. Proc. 2009–54 is superseded.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this revenue procedure is Bernard P. Harvey of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Mr. Harvey at (202) 622–4930 (not a toll-free call).

traveled during the month. In July, the employee substantiates to the payor 400 business miles traveled in June and returns $60.00 to the payor for the 100 business miles not traveled. The amount deemed substantiated for the 400 miles traveled is $200.00 and the employee is not required to return $40.00. No later than the first payroll period following the payroll period in which the 400 business miles traveled are substantiated, the payor must withhold and pay employment taxes on $40.00.

.02 The portion of a FAVR allowance, if any, that exceeds the amount deemed substantiated for those miles under section 7.01(2) of this revenue procedure is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes. See § 1.62–2(h)(2)(i)(B).

(1) Any periodic variable rate payment that relates to miles in excess of the business miles an employee substantiates and that the employee fails to return within a reasonable period, or any portion of a periodic fixed payment that relates to a period during which the employee is treated as not covered by the FAVR allowance and that the employee fails to return within a reasonable period, is subject to withhold

ing and payment of employment taxes no later than the first payroll period following the end of the reasonable period. See § 1.62–2(h)(2)(i)(A).

(2) Any optional high mileage payment is subject to withholding and payment of employment taxes when paid.

.03 All payments to an employee under a mileage allowance are treated as paid under a nonaccountable plan if the arrangement evidences a pattern of abuse. An arrangement evidences a pattern of abuse if, for example, it has no process to determine when an allowance exceeds the amount that may be deemed substantiated and the arrangement routinely pays allowances in excess of the amount that may be deemed substantiated without (1) requiring actual substantiation or repayment of the excess amount, or (2) treating the excess allowances as wages for employment tax purposes. See § 62(c), § 1.62–2(k), and Rev. Rul. 2006–56, 2006–2 C.B. 874. Thus, these payments are included in the employee’s gross income, are reported as wages or other compensation on the employee’s Form W–2, and are subject to withholding and payment of employment

2010–51 I.R.B. 890 December 20, 2010

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2010-51

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.