SECTION 4. SCOPE OF MEDIATION
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2009-40 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
.01 In general. Mediation may be used to resolve issues in cases that qualify under this revenue procedure while they are under consideration by Appeals. This procedure may be used only after Appeals settlement discussions are unsuccessful and, generally, when all other issues are resolved but for the issue(s) for which mediation is being requested.
.02 Authority . The mediation procedure does not create any special authority for settlement by Appeals. During the mediation process, Appeals is still subject to the procedures that would be applicable if the issue were being considered via the standard Appeals process, including procedures in the Internal Revenue Manual and existing published guidance.
.03 Applicability . Mediation is available for:
(1) Legal issues; (2) Factual issues; (3) A Compliance Coordinated Issue (CCI) or an Appeals Coordinated Issue (ACI). (CCI and ACI issues are listed online at www.irs.gov/appeals .) However, a
2009–40 I.R.B. 462 October 5, 2009
(d) Identify the location and the proposed date of the mediation session; and
(e) Prohibit ex parte contacts between the mediator and the parties.
The Appeals Team Manager, in consultation with the Team Case Leader or Appeals Officer, will sign the agreement to mediate on behalf of Appeals.
Generally, it is expected that the parties will complete and execute the agreement to mediate within three weeks after being notified that Appeals approved the mediation request and will proceed to mediation within 60 days after signing the agreement to mediate. A taxpayer’s inability to adhere to these timeframes, without reasonable cause, may result in Appeals’ withdrawal from the mediation process.
.02 Participants. The parties to the mediation process will be the taxpayer and Appeals. Each party must have at least one participant with decision-making authority attending the mediation session. The agreement to mediate will set forth the procedures by which the parties inform each other and the mediator of the participants in the mediation, and will set forth any limitation on the number, identity, or participation of such participants. In general, the parties are encouraged to include, in addition to the required decision-makers, those persons with information and expertise that will be useful to the decision-makers and the mediator. In this regard, Appeals has the discretion to communicate ex parte with the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, the originating function, e.g., Compliance, or both, in preparation for or during the mediation session. Appeals also has the discretion to have Counsel, the originating function, or both, participate in the mediation proceeding to present the position and views of the IRS, and to rebut representations and arguments made by the taxpayer. Counsel’s participation in this regard is separate from the review function outlined in Section 9.02 of this revenue procedure. To minimize the possibility of a last minute disqualification of the mediator, each party must notify the mediator and the other party of the participants on the party’s mediation team no later than two weeks before the mediation. See Exhibit 3 of this revenue procedure for a model participants list.
.03 Disclosure. To participate in mediation under this revenue procedure, the taxpayer must consent under section 6103(c)
(4) Collection cases, except for certain offer in compromise and Trust Fund Recovery Penalty cases as provided for in Announcement 2008–111 or any subsequent guidance issued by the IRS;
(5) Issues for which mediation would not be consistent with sound tax administration, such as, but not limited to, issues governed by closing agreements, by res ju- dicata, or by controlling Supreme Court precedent;
(6) Frivolous issues, such as, but not limited to, those identified in Rev. Proc. 2009–2, 2009–1 I.R.B. 87, or any subsequent revenue procedure;
(7) “Whipsaw” issues, such as, but not limited to, issues for which resolution with respect to one party might result in inconsistent treatment in the absence of participation of another party;
(8) Cases in which the taxpayer did not act in good faith during settlement negotiations, such as, but not limited to, cases in which the taxpayer failed to timely respond to document requests or offers to settle, or failed to address arguments and precedents raised by Appeals; and
(9) Issues that have been otherwise identified in subsequent guidance issued by the IRS as excluded from the mediation program.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code