PART I. IDENTIFICATION OF FAILURE(S) AND CORRECTION METHOD(S) AS SET FORTH IN REV. PROC.
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-35 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
2008–50, APPENDIX B, SECTION .07
The following failure(s) occurred with respect to the plan identified above (check failure(s) that apply)
□ A. § 401(a)(17) Failure in a Defined Contribution Plan¶
□ Contributions □ Forfeitures¶
were allocated on the basis of compensation in excess of the limit under § 401(a)(17) as provided below:
(Enter the plan years in which the failure occurred, the amount of the allocations in excess of § 401(a)(17) made for each plan year (including earnings), and the number of participants affected by the failure for each plan year:)
Description of Proposed Method of Correction:
An additional amount has been (or will be) contributed to the plan on behalf of each of the employees who received an allocation for the year of the failure (excluding each employee for whom there was a § 401(a)(17) failure). The amount contributed for an employee is equal to the employee’s plan compensation for the year of the failure multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the improperly allocated amount made on behalf of the employee with the largest improperly allocated amount, and the denominator of which is the limit under § 401(a)(17) applicable to the year of the failure. In addition, the plan will be retroactively amended to reflect the increased contribution and allocation percentages for the plan’s participants.
2008–35 I.R.B. 558 September 2, 2008
(Enter the plan years in which the failure occurred, the fraction used to determine the additional amount allocated to employees other than those for whom there was a § 401(a)(17) failure, and the total required contribution (before adjusting for earnings) for each plan year in which the failure occurred:)
The resulting additional amount will be adjusted for earnings from the end of the plan year in which the failure occurred through the date of the corrective contribution. The method for determining the earnings adjustment is as follows:
Former employees affected by the failure (check one)
□ There are no former employees affected by the failure. □ Affected former employees…¶
extent that an affected former employee cannot be located following a mailing to the employee’s last known address, the Plan Sponsor will take reasonable actions to locate that employee. Such actions include the use of the Internal Revenue Service Letter Forwarding Program (see Rev. Proc. 94–22, 1994–1 C.B. 608) or the Social Security Administration Employer Reporting Service. After such actions are taken, if an affected employee is not found but is subsequently located on a later date, the Plan Sponsor will make corrective contributions on behalf of the affected employee at that time.
□ B. Hardship Distribution Failure¶
Hardship distributions were made to participants under the plan. All plan participants were entitled to request hardship distributions, and all requests were evaluated in accordance with uniform eligibility standards, as described below:
September 2, 2008 559 2008–35 I.R.B.
(Enter the plan years in which the failure occurred, the number of hardship distributions made for each plan year, and the number and amount of distributions made to highly compensated employees (HCEs) and nonhighly compensated employees (NHCEs) respectively, affected by the failure for each plan year.)
Description of the Proposed Method of Correction:
The failure was (or will be) corrected by retroactively amending the plan to provide for the hardship distributions that were made available. The effective date of the corrective amendment is: ________________________.
□ C. Plan Loan Failure¶
Plan loans were made to participants under the plan. All plan participants were entitled to request plan loans under uniform standards of eligibility, and all plan loans made satisfied the requirements of § 72(p).
(Enter the plan years in which the failure occurred, the number of participant plan loans made for each plan year, and the number and amount of plan loans made to highly compensated employees (HCEs) and nonhighly compensated employees (NHCEs) respectively, affected by the failure for each plan year.)
Description of the Proposed Method of Correction:
The failure was (or will be) corrected by retroactively amending the plan to provide for the plan loans that were made available. The effective date of the corrective amendment is: ________________________.
□ D. Early Inclusion of Otherwise Eligible Employee Failure¶
Employees: (check the applicable box(es))
□ Who had not satisfied the plan’s minimum age or service requirements were treated as…¶
prior to their being eligible under the plan and were entitled to the same benefits under the plan to which they would have been entitled had they completed the minimum age or service requirements of the plan.
□ Who had completed the plan’s minimum age or service requirements were treated as…¶
the applicable plan entry date and were entitled to the same benefits under the plan to which they would have been entitled had they entered the plan timely.
2008–35 I.R.B. 560 September 2, 2008
The plan’s minimum age or service requirements and plan entry date, as applicable, for the years of the failure were as follows:
(Enter the plan years in which the failure occurred and the number of participants affected by the failure, broken down by type of employee (highly compensated employee (HCE) or nonhighly compensated employees (NHCE) respectively, for each plan year.)
Description of the Proposed Correction Method:
The failure was (or will be) corrected by retroactively amending the plan to provide for the inclusion of the ineligible
employees. The effective date of the corrective amendment is: .
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code