Skip to content

Bulletin No. 2008-13 March 31, 2008

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-13 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

REG–127391–07, page 689. Proposed regulations amend regulations under section 664(c) of the Code to provide that charitable remainder trusts with unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006, are exempt from federal income tax, but are subject to a 100-percent excise tax on the UBTI of the charitable remainder trust pursuant to section 424 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006. The regulations provide that the excise tax is reported and payable in accordance with appropriate forms. The regulations clarify that, consistent with regulations section 1.664–1(d)(2), the excise tax imposed upon the charitable remainder trust with UBTI is treated as paid from corpus and the trust income that is UBTI is income of the trust for purposes of determining the character of the distribution made to the beneficiary. A public hearing is scheduled for April 11, 2008.

Notice 2008–38, page 683. This notice invites public comments regarding guidance to be provided to federal, state, and local governments required to withhold on payments made by the government entities or their paying agents for services and property.

Rev. Proc. 2008–24, page 684. This procedure provides guidance concerning the treatment under sections 1035 and 72 of the Code of the partial exchange of an annuity contract. Specifically, the procedure makes those interim rules final, with clarifications concerning (i) the length of time a taxpayer must wait before withdrawing or annuitizing amounts from either of the contracts that were subject to the exchange (ii) the status of the transactions in which the same insurance company issued both contracts involved in the exchange and (iii) the treatment of transactions that fall outside of these rules. Notice 2003–51 superseded.

(Continued on the next page)

Rev. Proc. 2008–25, page 686. This procedure provides a safe harbor method of accounting for accrual method taxpayers that incur payroll tax liabilities for compensation (including bonuses and vacation pay). It also provides procedures for taxpayers to obtain the automatic consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to change to the safe harbor method of accounting. Rev. Proc. 2002–9 modified and amplified.

EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS

REG–127391–07, page 689. Proposed regulations amend regulations under section 664(c) of the Code to provide that charitable remainder trusts with unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006, are exempt from federal income tax, but are subject to a 100-percent excise tax on the UBTI of the charitable remainder trust pursuant to section 424 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006. The regulations provide that the excise tax is reported and payable in accordance with appropriate forms. The regulations clarify that, consistent with regulations section 1.664–1(d)(2), the excise tax imposed upon the charitable remainder trust with UBTI is treated as paid from corpus and the trust income that is UBTI is income of the trust for purposes of determining the character of the distribution made to the beneficiary. A public hearing is scheduled for April 11, 2008.

Announcement 2008–21, page 691. This announcement explains the procedures the public may use to request from the Service the inspection and copying of a section 501(c)(3) organization’s annual return reporting section 511 unrelated business income (Form 990–T).

Announcement 2008–22, page 692. The IRS has revoked its determination that Young Lions Foundation of Sausalito, CA; Med-School, Inc., of Warner Robbins, GA; National Housing Foundation, Inc., of Schaumburg, IL; Vernon Parish School Board of Leesville, VA; Credit Success Company of St. Augustine, FL; and Computer Programming Institute of N. Royalton, OH, qualify as organizations described in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Code.

EMPLOYMENT TAX

Rev. Rul. 2008–18, page 674. S corporation; qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub). This ruling describes situations where an S corporation undergoes a reorganization pursuant to section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code where the operating S corporation becomes a QSub of a newly formed holding company. The ruling holds that the newly formed parent does not have to make a new S election pursuant to Rev. Rul. 64–250. The ruling further holds that, effec

tive 1/1/09, the new parent will have to get its own EIN rather than take over the QSub’s EIN. However, for S corporations that have previously reorganized under section 368(a)(1)(F) in a manner described in this ruling, where the parent took the QSub’s EIN, the parent should continue to use that EIN and the QSub will have to get a new EIN when it is treated as a separate corporation. Rev. Rul. 64–250 amplified.

EXCISE TAX

Rev. Rul. 2008–18, page 674. S corporation; qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub). This ruling describes situations where an S corporation undergoes a reorganization pursuant to section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code where the operating S corporation becomes a QSub of a newly formed holding company. The ruling holds that the newly formed parent does not have to make a new S election pursuant to Rev. Rul. 64–250. The ruling further holds that, effective 1/1/09, the new parent will have to get its own EIN rather than take over the QSub’s EIN. However, for S corporations that have previously reorganized under section 368(a)(1)(F) in a manner described in this ruling, where the parent took the QSub’s EIN, the parent should continue to use that EIN and the QSub will have to get a new EIN when it is treated as a separate corporation. Rev. Rul. 64–250 amplified.

ADMINISTRATIVE

Rev. Rul. 2008–18, page 674. S corporation; qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub). This ruling describes situations where an S corporation undergoes a reorganization pursuant to section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code where the operating S corporation becomes a QSub of a newly formed holding company. The ruling holds that the newly formed parent does not have to make a new S election pursuant to Rev. Rul. 64–250. The ruling further holds that, effective 1/1/09, the new parent will have to get its own EIN rather than take over the QSub’s EIN. However, for S corporations that have previously reorganized under section 368(a)(1)(F) in a manner described in this ruling, where the parent took the QSub’s EIN, the parent should continue to use that EIN and the QSub will have to get a new EIN when it is treated as a separate corporation. Rev. Rul. 64–250 amplified.

Notice 2008–39, page 684. This notice describes filing rules for certain claims arising under section 41 of the Code. Notice 2002–44 superseded.

(Continued on the next page)

March 31, 2008 2008–13 I.R.B.

Announcement 2008–24, page 692. This document provides notice of a public hearing on proposed regulations (REG–127770–07, 2007–50 I.R.B. 1171) that would expand the list of permitted loan modifications to include certain modifications of commercial mortgages. A public hearing is scheduled for April 4, 2008.

Announcement 2008–26, page 693. This document contains a notice of public hearing on proposed regulations (REG–149856–03, 2007–24 I.R.B. 1394) relating to a claim that a child is a dependent by parents who are divorced, legally separated under a decree of separate maintenance, agreement, or who live apart at all times during the last 6 months of the calendar year. A public hearing is scheduled for April 3, 2008.

2008–13 I.R.B. March 31, 2008

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-13

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.