Article 24(1) of the Treaty generally
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2008-2 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
Sections in this part
- SECTION 3. INTERIM GUIDANCE
- SECTION 4. REQUEST FOR
- SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
- SECTION 6. DRAFTING
- SECTION 3. WHAT ARE THE PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING RECOGNITION OF EXEMPT
- SECTION 4. WHAT ARE THE STANDARDS FOR ISSUING A DETERMINATION LETTER OR RULING
- SECTION 12. REVOCATION OR MODIFICATION OF DETERMINATION LETTER OR RULING
- SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE
- SECTION 2. NATURE OF
- SECTION 3. WHAT ARE
- SECTION 4. WHAT ARE THE
- SECTION 5. WHAT OFFICES
- SECTION 6. WITHDRAWAL
- SECTION 7. WHAT ARE
- SECTION 8. DISCLOSURE
- SECTION 9. REVIEW OF
- SECTION 10. DECLARATORY
- SECTION 11. EFFECT OF
- SECTION 12. REVOCATION
- SECTION 13. EFFECT
- SECTION 14. EFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective January 7, 2008.
- SECTION 15. PAPERWORK
provides that the United States will allow a credit for income tax paid to Mexico by or on behalf of a U.S. resident. The taxes in paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 2 (Taxes Covered by the Convention) of the Treaty are treated as income taxes for purposes of Article 24(1) and are therefore eligible for a credit. In the case of Mexico, these taxes are the income tax imposed by Mexico’s Income Tax Law and any substantially similar taxes imposed in addition to, or in place of, the taxes listed in paragraph 3 of Article 2 after September 18, 1992, the date the Treaty was signed.
The IRS and the Treasury Department believe that the provisions, design, and full operation of the IETU, including its interaction with Mexico’s regular income tax, require study to determine whether the IETU is a creditable income tax. In view of the responsibility of the IRS to administer U.S. tax laws and treaties, pending the conclusion of this study, the IRS will not challenge a taxpayer’s position that the IETU is an income tax that is eligible for a credit under Article 24(1) of the Treaty. This notice is effective for the IETU paid or accrued on or after January 1, 2008. Any change in the foreign tax credit treatment of the IETU as a result of the study will be prospective, and apply solely to the IETU paid or accrued in taxable years beginning after the date that further guidance is issued.
2008–2 I.R.B. 253 January 14, 2008
(v) A description of the amount(s) and tax year(s) of Federal tax claimed to be owed, and facts supporting the basis for the amount(s) claimed to be owed;
(vi) Documentation to substantiate the claim ( e.g., financial data; the location of bank accounts, assets, books, and records; transaction documents or analyses relevant to the claim); and
(vii) Any and all other facts and information pertaining to the claim.
If available information is not provided by the claimant, the claimant bears the risk that such information may not be considered by the Whistleblower Office in making any award determination. If documents or supporting evidence are known to the claimant but are not in his or her possession or control, the claimant should describe these documents and identify their location to the best of his or her ability.
(8) Explanation of how the information that forms the basis of the claim came to the attention of the claimant, including the date(s) on which this information was acquired, and a complete description of the claimant’s present or former relationship (if any) to the person that is the subject of the claim ( e.g., family member, acquaintance, client, employee, accountant, lawyer, bookkeeper, customer). If the claimant identifies multiple person(s) as the subject of a claim, describe his or her relationship to each person.
(9) Information submitted under section 7623 must be accompanied by an original signed declaration under penalty of perjury, as follows:
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that I have examined this application and my accompanying statement and supporting documentation and aver that such application is true, correct and complete, to the best of my knowledge. The requirement to submit information under penalty of perjury precludes submissions by: (1) a person serving as a representative of the claimant, or (2) an entity other than a natural person. With respect to claims under section 7623(b), the requirement to submit information under penalty of perjury precludes submissions made anonymously or under an alias.
(10) Joint claims must be signed by each claimant and each claimant must sign the claim under penalty of perjury as described in 3.03(8).
submissions of information under section 7623(a). New section 7623(b) requires that awards be made for submissions meeting certain criteria. Individuals are eligible for section 7623(b) awards based on the amount collected as a result of any administrative or judicial action resulting from the information provided. Because new section 7623(b) includes several requirements that are inconsistent with existing regulations and administrative guidance applicable to award claims under section 7623(a), the regulations which appear at section 301.7623–1 will not apply to the new award program authorized by section 7623(b). This notice provides interim guidance applicable to award claims submitted under the authority of section 7623(b). In addition, this notice seeks public comment on the topics covered herein.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code