Skip to content

SECTION 3. EXAMPLES

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-38 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

The following examples illustrate the application of section 937(b):

Example 1 . (i) Facts. Corporation A, a corporation organized in a U.S. territory (Territory X), is engaged in a business consisting of the development of computer software and the sale of that software. Corporation A has its sole place of business in Territory X. Assume for purposes of this example that Corporation A is not engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Corporation A receives orders for its software from customers in the United States and around the world. After orders are accepted, Corporation A’s software is either: (1) loaded onto compact discs at Corporation A’s Territory X facility and shipped via common carrier, or (2) downloaded from Corporation A’s server in Territory X. The sales contract provides that the rights, title, and interest in the product will pass from Corporation A to the customer either at Corporation A’s place of business in Territory X (if shipped in compact disc form) or at Corporation A’s server in Territory X (if electronically downloaded). Assume for purposes of this example that each transaction is classified as a sale of a copyrighted article under Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861–18(c)(1)(ii) and (f)(2).

September 18, 2006 459 2006–38 I.R.B.

(ii) Analysis. Under the principles of section 863(a), as applied pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.937–2T(b), because Corporation A passes the rights, title, and interest to the copyrighted articles in Territory X, Corporation A’s sales income is sourced to Territory X. Corporation A’s sales income is also effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in Territory X, under the principles of section 864(c)(3) as applied pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.937–3T(b). Corporation A’s income is not from sources within the United States, nor is it effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Accordingly, the U.S. income rule of section 937(b)(2) and Temp. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.937–2T(c)(1) and 1.937–3T(c)(1) does not operate to prevent Corporation A’s sales income from being Territory X source and Territory X effectively connected income under section 937(b)(1).

Example 2 . (i) Facts. Corporation B, a corporation organized in Territory X, has its sole place of business in Territory X. Assume for purposes of this example that Corporation B is not engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Corporation B employs a software business model generally referred to as an “application service provider.” Employees of Corporation B in Territory X develop software and maintain it on Corporation B’s server in Territory X. Corporation B’s customers in the United States and around the world transmit detailed data about their own customers to Corporation B’s server and electronic storage facility in Territory X. The cus

tomers pay a monthly fee to Corporation B under a “Subscription Agreement,” and they can use the software to generate reports analyzing the data at any time but do not receive a copy of the software. Corporation B’s software allows its customers to generate the reports from their location and to keep track of their relationships with their own customers. Assume for purposes of this example that Corporation B’s income from these transactions is derived from the provision of services.

(ii) Analysis. Under the principles of section 861(a)(3) and Treas. Reg. § 1.861–4(a), as applied pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.937–2T(b), because Corporation B performs personal services wholly within Territory X, the compensation Corporation B receives for services is sourced to Territory X. Corporation B’s services income is also effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in Territory X, under the principles of section 864(c)(3) as applied pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.937–3T(b). Corporation B’s income is not from sources within the United States, nor is it effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Accordingly, the U.S. income rule of section 937(b)(2) and Temp. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.937–2T(c)(1) and 1.937–3T(c)(1) does not operate to prevent Corporation B’s services income from being Territory X source or Territory X effectively connected income within the meaning of section 937(b)(1).

NOTE:

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-38

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.