SECTION 14. AUDIT CAP SANCTION
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-22 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
.01 Determination of sanction . Except as otherwise provided in section 14.04, the sanction under Audit CAP is a negotiated percentage of the Maximum Payment Amount. Sanctions will not be excessive and will bear a reasonable relationship to the nature, extent, and severity of the failures, based on the factors below.
.02 Factors considered . Factors include: (1) the steps taken by the Plan Sponsor to ensure that the plan had no failures; (2) the steps taken to identify failures that may have occurred; (3) the extent to which correction had progressed before the examination was initiated, including full correction; (4) the number and type of employees affected by the failure; (5) the number of nonhighly compensated employees who would be adversely affected if the plan were not treated as qualified or as satisfying the requirements of § 403(b), § 408(k) or § 408(p); (6) whether the failure is a failure to satisfy the requirements of § 401(a)(4), § 401(a)(26), or § 410(b), either directly or through § 403(b)(12); (7) the period over which the failure(s) occurred (for example, the time that has elapsed since the end of the applicable remedial amendment period under § 401(b) for a Plan Document Failure; and (8) the reason for the failure(s) (for example, data errors such as errors in transcription of data, the transposition of numbers, or
minor arithmetic errors). Factors relating only to Qualified Plans also include: (1) whether the plan is the subject of a Favorable Letter; (2) whether the plan has both Operational and other failures; (3) the extent to which the plan has accepted Transferred Assets, and the extent to which the failure(s) relate to Transferred Assets and occurred before the transfer; and (4) whether the failure(s) were discovered during the determination letter process. If one of the failures discovered during an Employee Plans examination includes the failure to amend the plan timely for relevant legislation, it is expected that the sanction will be greater than the applicable fee described in section 14.04. Additional factors relating only to 403(b) Plans include: (1) whether the plan has a combination of Operational, Demographic, or Employer Eligibility Failures; (2) the extent to which the failure relates to Excess Amounts; and (3) whether the failure is solely an Employer Eligibility Failure.
.03 Transferred Assets . If the examination involves a plan with Transferred Assets and the Service determines that no new incidents of the failures that relate to the Transferred Assets occur after the end of the second plan year that begins after the corporate merger, acquisition, or other similar employer transaction, the sanction under Audit CAP will not exceed the sanction that would apply if the Transferred Assets were maintained as a separate plan.
.04 Fee for nonamenders discovered during the determination letter application process not related to a VCP submission . (1) The compliance fee for nonamenders
| Number of Participants |
EGTRRA/ subsequent legislation |
GUST/ 401(a)(9) Regs |
UCA/ OBRA ’93 |
TRA ’86 | T/D/R | ERISA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 or less | $ 2,500 | $ 3,000 | $ 3,500 | $ 4,000 | $ 4,500 | $ 5,000 |
| 21–50 | $ 5,000 | $ 6,000 | $ 7,000 | $ 8,000 | $ 9,000 | $10,000 |
| 51–100 | $ 7,500 | $ 9,000 | $10,500 | $12,000 | $13,500 | $15,000 |
| 101–500 | $12,500 | $15,000 | $17,500 | $20,000 | $22,500 | $25,000 |
| 501–1,000 | $17,500 | $21,000 | $24,500 | $28,000 | $31,500 | $35,000 |
| 1,001–5,000 | $25,000 | $30,000 | $35,000 | $40,000 | $45,000 | $50,000 |
| 5,001–10,000 | $32,500 | $39,000 | $45,500 | $52,000 | $58,500 | $65,000 |
| Over 10,000 | $40,000 | $48,000 | $56,000 | $64,000 | $72,000 | $80,000 |
May 30, 2006 969 2006–22 I.R.B.
in the headings below. Corrective allocations and distributions should reflect earnings and actuarial adjustments in accordance with section 6.02(4) of Rev. Proc. 2006–27. The correction methods in this appendix are acceptable under SCP and VCP. Additionally, the correction methods and the earnings adjustment methods in Appendix B are acceptable under SCP and VCP. To the extent a failure listed in this appendix could occur under a 403(b) Plan, a SEP or a SIMPLE IRA Plan, the correction method listed for such failure may be used to correct the failure.
.02 Failure to properly provide the min- imum top-heavy benefit under § 416 to non-key employees . In a defined contribution plan, the permitted correction method is to properly contribute and allocate the required top-heavy minimums to the plan in the manner provided for in the plan on behalf of the non-key employees (and any other employees required to receive top-heavy allocations under the plan). In a defined benefit plan, the minimum required benefit must be accrued in the manner provided in the plan.
.03 Failure to satisfy the ADP test set forth in § 401(k)(3), the ACP test set forth in § 401(m)(2), or, for plan years begin- ning on or before December 31, 2001, the multiple use test of § 401(m)(9) . The permitted correction method is to make qualified nonelective contributions (QNCs) (as defined in §1.401(k)–6 and formerly in § 1.401(k)–1(g)(13)(ii)) on behalf of the nonhighly compensated employees to the extent necessary to raise the actual deferral percentage or actual contribution percentage of the nonhighly compensated employees to the percentage needed to pass the test or tests. The contributions must be made on behalf of all eligible nonhighly compensated employees (to the extent permitted under § 415) and must be the same percentage of compensation. QNCs contributed to satisfy the ADP test need not be taken into account for determining additional contributions ( e.g., a matching contribution), if any. Employees who would have been eligible for a matching contribution had they made elective contributions must be counted as eligible employees for the ACP test, and the plan must satisfy the ACP test. Under this correction method, a plan may not be treated as two separate plans, one covering otherwise excludable employees and the other
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code