Skip to content

Introduction

SECTION 8. WHEN SHOULD

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-1 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

A TAM OR TEAM BE REQUESTED?

.01 The EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, determines whether to request a TAM or a TEAM on an issue. Each request must be submitted through proper channels and signed by a person who is authorized to sign for the EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. The mandatory technical advice described in section 4.04(3) of this revenue procedure, for cases concerning amendments to defined contribution plans in connection with a waiver of the minimum funding standard and a request for a determination letter, is treated as if it had been a request for technical advice submitted by the EP Determinations manager. See section 15 of Rev. Proc. 2006–6 and section 3.04 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15 for the procedural rules applicable to this particular mandatory technical advice.

.02 While a case is under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations, EP or EO Determinations, or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, a taxpayer may request that an issue be referred to the EP or EO Technical office for a TAM or a TEAM.

Uniformity of position lacking .01 A TAM or a TEAM should be requested when there is a lack of uniformity regarding the disposition of an issue or when an issue is unusual or complex enough to warrant consideration by EP or EO Technical.

When can a TAM or a TEAM be requested

.02 The provisions of this revenue procedure apply only to a case under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations, EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. A TAM or a TEAM may also be requested on issues considered in a prior appeals disposition, not based on mutual concessions for the same tax period of the same taxpayer, if the appeals office that had the case concurs in the request.

(1) EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations may not request a TAM or TEAM on an issue if an appeals office is currently considering an identical issue of the same taxpayer (or of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504).

(2) A case remains under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations even though an appeals office has the identical issue under consideration in the case of another taxpayer (not related within the meaning of § 267 or § 1504) in an entirely different transaction. With respect to the same taxpayer or the same transaction, when the issue is under the jurisdiction of an appeals office, and the applicability of more than one kind of federal tax is dependent upon the resolution of that issue, EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations may not request a TAM or TEAM on the applicability of any of the taxes involved.

(3) EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or an Appeals Area Director, Area 4, also may not request a TAM or TEAM on an issue if the same issue of the same taxpayer (or of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504) is in a docketed case for the same taxpayer (or for a related taxpayer or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member) for any taxable year.

(4) A TEAM cannot be requested on those areas of mandatory technical advice set forth in section 4.04 of this procedure.

At the earliest possible stage .03 Once an issue is identified, all requests for a TAM or a TEAM should be made at the earliest possible stage in the proceeding. The fact that the issue is raised late in the examination,

Sec. 8.03 2006–1 I.R.B. 181 January 3, 2006

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-1

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.