Skip to content

Introduction

SECTION 4. PROCEDURE

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-41 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

.01 Rev. Proc. 2005–1 is amplified by adding the following sentence to the first paragraph of section 7.02(4):

Notwithstanding the previous sentence, expedited handling may be available for certain transactions intended to qualify as reorganizations described in § 368 or distributions described in § 355 as provided in Rev. Proc. 2005–68, Section 4.02.

.02 Rev. Proc. 2005–1 is amplified by adding the following paragraphs to section 7.02(4): EXPEDITED LETTER RULING PROCESS FOR REORGANIZATIONS AND FOR DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER SECTION 355: If a taxpayer requests a letter ruling on whether a transaction constitutes a reorganization under § 368 or a distribution under § 355 and asks for expedited handling pursuant to this provision, the Service will grant expedited handling. If expedited handling is granted, the Service will endeavor to complete and issue the letter ruling subject to Section 3.01(3) of Rev. Proc. 2005–3 within ten weeks after receiving the ruling request. If the transaction involves an issue or issues not entirely within the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the letter ruling request will be processed in the usual manner, unless each Associate Chief Counsel having jurisdiction over an issue in the transaction agrees to process the letter ruling request on an expedited basis.

To initiate this process, the taxpayer must (i) state at the top of the first page of the request letter: “Expedited Handling is Requested” and (ii) provide the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) with a copy of the request letter by facsimile transmission (fax), without attachments, when the formal request is submitted. The fax copy

should be sent to (202) 622–7707, Attn: CC:CORP (Expedite). In due course, the taxpayer must also provide the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) with a draft ruling letter setting forth the relevant facts, applicable representations, and requested rulings in a manner consistent with the format used by the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) in similar cases. See section 7.02(3) of Rev. Proc. 2005–1. In addition, the taxpayer must ensure that the formal submission of its letter ruling request complies with all of the requirements of Rev. Proc. 2005–1 (including the requirements of other applicable guidelines set forth in Appendix E of Rev. Proc. 2005–1). See section 8.05(1) of Rev. Proc. 2005–1 for a modified requirement regarding the submission of additional information. If the taxpayer does not satisfy the requirements of this paragraph, the letter ruling request will not be processed on an expedited basis, but instead will be processed in the usual manner.

.03 Rev. Proc. 2005–1 is also amplified by adding the following paragraph to section 8.05(1):

The Service will not endeavor to process a ruling request on the expedited basis provided by Rev. Proc. 2005–68, Section 4.02, unless the branch representative in Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) receives all requested additional information within 10 calendar days from the date of the request for such additional information, unless an extension of time is granted. If the information is not provided within 10 calendar days (with any extension) but is provided within 21 calendar days (with any extension), the letter ruling request will cease to be processed on an expedited basis and instead will be processed in the usual manner.

.04 Rev. Proc. 2005–3 is amplified by adding the following sentence as the last sentence in the paragraph entitled “Significant Issue” in section 3.01(31):

An issue of law will be considered not clearly and adequately addressed by the authorities above, and its resolution will not be essentially free from doubt when, because of concern over a legal issue (as

2005–41 I.R.B. 696 October 11, 2005

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-41

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.