Introduction›Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Section 1274.—Determi- nation of Issue Price in the Case of Certain Debt Instru- ments…
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-19 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
(Also Sections 42, 280G, 382, 412, 467, 468, 482, 483, 642, 807, 846, 1288, 7520, 7872.)
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term exempt rate. For purposes of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections of the Code, tables set forth the rates for May 2005.
Rev. Rul. 2005–27
This revenue ruling provides various prescribed rates for federal income tax purposes for May 2005 (the current month). Table 1 contains the short-term, mid-term, and long-term applicable federal rates (AFR) for the current month
arrive at a purchase price for a new car. The ruling holds that the rebates reduce the purchase price of the cars and are not includible in the retail customer’s gross income. The ruling further holds that the manufacturer may deduct the rebates as ordinary and necessary business expenses under § 162.
The Medicaid Rebate is paid by M to S pursuant to the terms of the rebate agreement. Under the purpose and intent test of Pittsburgh Milk, the Medicaid Rebate is made with the purpose and intent of reaching an agreed upon net selling price, and is negotiated and agreed to before the sale to W takes place.
HOLDING
Medicaid Rebates incurred by a pharmaceutical manufacturer are purchase price adjustments that are subtracted from gross receipts in determining gross income.
EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Rev. Rul. 76–96 is suspended in part. Whether a rebate of the type described in Rev. Rul. 76–96 is an ordinary and necessary business expense or, alternatively, is a reduction of gross receipts in determining gross income, is an issue under reconsideration. Accordingly, the conclusion of Rev. Rul. 76–96 that rebates made by the manufacturer are ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible under § 162 is suspended pending the Service’s reconsideration of the issue and publication of subsequent guidance. Therefore, the Service will not apply, and taxpayers may not rely on, this conclusion while it is being reconsidered.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue ruling is Susie K. Bird of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Ms. Bird at (202) 622–4950 (not a toll-free call).
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code