Skip to content

Part II of Notice 2002–45 states that to

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-16 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

qualify for the exclusion from gross income, an HRA may only provide benefits that reimburse expenses for medical care as defined in § 213(d). An HRA does not qualify for the exclusion under § 105(b) if any person has the right to receive cash or any other taxable or non-taxable benefit under the arrangement other than the reimbursement of medical care expenses. If any person has such a right, currently or for any future year, all distributions to all persons made from the arrangement in the current year are included in gross income, even amounts paid to reimburse medical care expenses. The notice specifically states that arrangements providing for the payment of a death benefit, a bonus, or a separation payment without regard to medical care expenses do not qualify for tax-favored treatment.

Notice 2002–45 notes that arrangements formally outside the HRA that provide for the adjustment of an employee’s compensation or an employee’s receipt of any other benefit will be considered in determining whether the arrangement is an HRA and whether the benefits are eligible for the exclusion from gross income.

Rev. Rul. 75–539, 1975–2 C.B. 45, describes two labor contracts. Contract A provides that upon retirement, an employee will receive a portion of accumulated unused sick leave credits as a cash payment or, at the election of the employee, the payment may be applied to continue the employee’s participation in the employer’s health plan. Contract B provides that the value of a portion of the accumulated unused sick leave credits will be used to pay for continued participation in the employer’s health plan. Under no circumstances under Contract B may the retired employee, the retired employee’s spouse or dependents receive this payment in cash.

Rev. Rul. 75–539 holds that, under Contract A, the value of unused accumulated sick leave credits used to continue health coverage is constructively received by the retired employee under § 451, and therefore is includible in the retired employee’s gross income. Under Contract A, the amount of premium payments is considered an employee contribution out of salary and not a contribution by the

April 18, 2005 893 2005–16 I.R.B.

Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Ms. Pie at (202) 622–6080 (not a toll-free call).

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-16

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.