SECTION 16. ADVISORY LETTERS

• SCOPE

.01 General Limits on Advisory Letters — Advisory letters will be issued only to VS practitioners or VS mass submitters. Advisory letters constitute determinations as to the qualification of the plans as adopted by particular employers only under the circumstances, and to the extent, described in section 19. Advisory letters do not constitute rulings or determinations as to the exempt status of related trusts or custodial accounts.

.02 Areas Not Covered by Advisory Letters - Advisory letters will not be issued for:

(1) Multiemployer plans; (2) Union plans (This does not preclude a VS plan from covering employees of the employer who are included in a unit covered by a collective bargaining agreement or the adoption of a VS plan pursuant to such agreement as a single employer plan which covers only employees of the employer.);

(3) Stock bonus plans; (4) Employee stock ownership plans; (5) Pooled fund arrangements contemplated by Rev. Rul. 81–100, 1981–1 C.B. 326; (6) Annuity contracts under § 403(b); (7) Cash balance plans or other defined benefit plans under which the test for nondiscrimination under § 401(a)(4) is made by reference to contributions rather than benefits;

(8) Plans described in § 414(k) (relating to a defined benefit plan which provides a benefit derived from employer contributions which is based partly on the balance of the separate account of a participant);

(9) Target benefit plans, other than plans which, by their terms, satisfy each of the safe harbor requirements described in § 1.401(a)(4)–8(b)(3)(i), as well as the additional rules in § 1.401(a)(4)–8(b)(3)(ii) through (vii);

(10) Defined benefit plans that provide for employee contributions;

(11) Church plans described in § 414(e) that have not made the election provided by § 410(d);

(12) Governmental plans that include so-called “DROP” provisions or similar provisions;

(13) Plans under which the § 415 limitations are incorporated by reference;

(14) Plans that incorporate the ADP test under § 401(k)(3) or the ACP test under § 401(m)(2) by reference;

(15) Section 401(k) plans that provide for hardship distributions under circumstances other than those described in the safe harbor standards in the regulations under § 401(k);

(16) Fully-insured § 412(i) plans, other than plans that, by their terms, satisfy the safe harbor for § 412(i) plans in § 1.401(a)(4)–3(b)(5);

2004-18 I.R.B. 874 May 3, 2004

tive on or after the effective date of the repeal of § 415(e) will not be considered to have maintained another plan merely because the employer has maintained a defined benefit plan(s), provided the defined benefit plan(s) has been terminated prior to the effective date of the standardized defined contribution plan.

(2) An employer that has adopted a standardized defined benefit plan may rely on an opinion letter with respect to the requirements of § 401(a)(26) only if the plan satisfies the requirements of § 401(a)(26) with respect to its prior benefit structure or is deemed to satisfy § 401(a)(26) under the regulations. However, an employer may request a determination letter if the employer wishes to have reliance as to whether the plan satisfies § 401(a)(26) with respect to its prior benefit structure.

(3) An employer that adopts a standardized plan may not rely on an opinion letter with respect to: (a) whether the timing of any amendment to the plan (or series of amendments) satisfies the nondiscrimination requirements of § 1.401(a)(4)–5(a), except with respect to plan amendments granting past service that meet the safe harbor described in § 1.401(a)(4)–5(a)(3) and are not part of a pattern of amendments that significantly discriminates in favor of highly compensated employees; or (b) whether the plan satisfies the effective availability requirement of § 1.401(a)(4)–4(c) with respect to any benefit, right, or feature. An employer that adopts a standardized plan as an amendment to a plan other than a standardized plan may not rely on an opinion letter with respect to whether a benefit, right, or feature that is prospectively eliminated satisfies the current availability requirements of § 1.401(a)(4)–4 of the regulations. Such an employer may request a determination letter if the employer wishes to have reliance as to whether the prospectively eliminated benefit, right, or feature satisfies the current availability requirements.

.02 Nonstandardized M&P Plans and Volume Submitter Plans - An employer adopting a nonstandardized M&P or volume submitter plan may rely on that plan’s opinion or advisory letter as described below if the employer’s plan is identical to an approved M&P or specimen plan with a currently valid favorable opinion or advisory letter, the employer has chosen only options permitted under the terms of the

plan (other than a target benefit plan), a target benefit plan, and a defined benefit plan. Different categories may not be combined in a single specimen plan or application.

.04 Sample Language - A Listing of Required Modifications (LRM) containing sample plan language is available from Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements. Although the sample language is designed for use in M&P plans, which use an adoption agreement format, VS practitioners should refer to the sample language as a guide in drafting VS plans. To expedite the review of their plans, VS practitioners are encouraged to use LRM language where appropriate and to identify where such language is being used in their plan documents. LRMs may be downloaded from the Internet at the following address: http://www.irs.gov .