INCOME TAX
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2004-12 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
Rev. Rul. 2004–27, page 625. Tax avoidance schemes; meritless “corporation sole” ar- guments. This ruling emphasizes to taxpayers, tax scheme promoters and return preparers that, while a “corporation sole” is a legitimate corporate form that may be used by a religious leader to hold property and conduct business for the benefit of the religious entity, a taxpayer cannot avoid income tax by establishing a religious organization for tax avoidance purposes.
Rev. Rul. 2004–28, page 624. Frivolous tax returns; excluding gross income under sec- tion 911. This ruling emphasizes to taxpayers, and to promoters and return preparers who assist taxpayers with frivolous tax schemes, that there is no basis for excluding income earned in a State, Commonwealth, or Territory of the United States under section 911 of the Code. The ruling also describes many of the possible civil and criminal penalties that apply to people who claim tax benefits on their return based on frivolous claims under section 911.
Rev. Rul. 2004–29, page 627. Frivolous tax returns; meritless “claim of right” argu- ments. This ruling emphasizes to taxpayers, and to promoters and return preparers who assist taxpayers with frivolous tax schemes, that there is no “claim of right” doctrine that permits an individual to take the position that either the individual or the individual’s income is not subject to federal income tax. The ruling also describes many of the possible civil and criminal penalties that apply to people who make frivolous “claim of right” arguments to evade tax.
Finding Lists begin on page ii.
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code