Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-49 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
Listed Transactions
Notice 2003–76
This notice updates the list of transactions that have been determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be “listed transactions” for purposes of § 1.6011–4(b)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations and § 301.6111–2(b)(2) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations. This notice restates the list of “listed transactions” in Notice 2001–51, 2001–2 C.B. 190, and updates the list by adding transactions identified as “listed transactions” in notices and other guidance released subsequent to August 2, 2001.
Transactions that are the same as or substantially similar to transactions described in the list below have been determined by the Service to be tax avoidance transactions and are “listed transactions” for purposes of § 1.6011–4(b)(2) and § 301.6111–2(b)(2). As a result, taxpayers may need to disclose their participation in these listed transactions as prescribed in § 1.6011–4, and promoters (or other persons responsible for registering tax shelter transactions) may need to register these transactions under § 301.6111–2. In addition, material advisors must maintain lists of investors and other information with respect to these listed transactions pursuant to § 301.6112–1.
(1) Rev. Rul. 90–105, 1990–2 C.B. 69 (transactions in which taxpayers claim deductions for contributions to a qualified cash or deferred arrangement or matching contributions to a defined contribution plan where the contributions are attributable to compensation earned by plan participants after the end of the taxable year (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)). See also Rev. Rul. 2002–46, 2002–2 C.B. 117 (result is the same, and transactions are substantially similar, even though the contributions are designated as satisfying a liability established before the end of the taxable year), modified by Rev. Rul. 2002–73, 2002–2 C.B. 805;
(2) Notice 95–34, 1995–1 C.B. 309 (certain trust arrangements purported to qualify as multiple employer welfare benefit funds exempt from the limits of
§§ 419 and 419A of the Internal Revenue Code (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)). See also § 1.419A(f)(6)–1 of the Income Tax Regulations (10 or more employer plans);
(3) Transactions described in Part II of Notice 98–5, 1998–1 C.B. 334 (transactions in which the reasonably expected economic profit is insubstantial in comparison to the value of the expected foreign tax credits (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));
(4) Transactions substantially similar to those at issue in ASA Investerings Partner- ship v. Commissioner, 201 F.3d 505 (D.C. Cir. 2000), and ACM Partnership v. Com- missioner, 157 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 1998) (transactions involving contingent installment sales of securities by partnerships in order to accelerate and allocate income to a tax-indifferent partner, such as a tax-exempt entity or foreign person, and to allocate later losses to another partner (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (5) Treas. Reg. § 1.643(a)–8 (transactions involving distributions described in § 1.643(a)–8 from charitable remainder trusts (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));
(6) Notice 99–59, 1999–2 C.B. 761 (transactions involving the distribution of encumbered property in which taxpayers claim tax losses for capital outlays that they have in fact recovered (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)). See also Treas. Reg. § 1.301–1(g); (7) Treas. Reg. § 1.7701(l)–3 (transactions involving fast-pay arrangements as defined in § 1.7701(l)–3(b) (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (8) Rev. Rul. 2000–12, 2000–1 C.B. 744 (certain transactions involving the acquisition of two debt instruments the values of which are expected to change significantly at about the same time in opposite directions (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));
(9) Notice 2000–44, 2000–2 C.B. 255 (transactions generating losses resulting from artificially inflating the basis of partnership interests (identified as “listed transactions” on August 11, 2000)). See also § 1.752–6T of the temporary Income Tax Regulations and §§ 1.752–1(a) and
1.752–7 of the proposed Income Tax Regulations;
(10) Notice 2000–60, 2000–2 C.B. 568 (transactions involving the purchase of a parent corporation’s stock by a subsidiary, a subsequent transfer of the purchased parent stock from the subsidiary to the parent’s employees, and the eventual liquidation or sale of the subsidiary (identified as “listed transactions” on November 16, 2000)); (11) Notice 2000–61, 2000–2 C.B. 569 (transactions purporting to apply § 935 to Guamanian trusts (identified as “listed transactions” on November 21, 2000));
(12) Notice 2001–16, 2001–1 C.B. 730 (transactions involving the use of an intermediary to sell the assets of a corporation (identified as “listed transactions” on January 18, 2001));
(13) Notice 2001–17, 2001–1 C.B. 730 (transactions involving a loss on the sale of stock acquired in a purported § 351 transfer of a high basis asset to a corporation and the corporation’s assumption of a liability that the transferor has not yet taken into account for federal income tax purposes (identified as “listed transactions” on January 18, 2001));
(14) Notice 2001–45, 2001–2 C.B. 129 (certain redemptions of stock in transactions not subject to U.S. tax in which the basis of the redeemed stock is purported to shift to a U.S. taxpayer (identified as “listed transactions” on July 26, 2001));
(15) Notice 2002–21, 2002–1 C.B. 730 (transactions involving the use of a loan assumption agreement to inflate basis in assets acquired from another party to claim losses (identified as “listed transactions” on March 18, 2002));
(16) Notice 2002–35, 2002–1 C.B. 992 (transactions involving the use of a notional principal contract to claim current deductions for periodic payments made by a taxpayer while disregarding the accrual of a right to receive offsetting payments in the future (identified as “listed transactions” on May 6, 2002));
(17) Notice 2002–50, 2002–2 C.B. 98 (transactions involving the use of a straddle, a tiered partnership structure, a transitory partner, and the absence of a § 754 election to claim a permanent non-economic loss (identified as “listed transactions” on June 25, 2002)); Notice 2002–65,
2003-49 I.R.B. 1181 December 8, 2003
LAW
Section 461(f) provides an exception to the general rules of tax accounting by allowing a taxpayer to deduct a contested liability in a year prior to the resolution of the contest if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the taxpayer contests an asserted liability; (2) the taxpayer transfers money or other property to provide for the satisfaction of the asserted liability; (3) the contest with respect to the asserted liability exists after the time of transfer; and (4) but for the fact that the asserted liability is contested, a deduction would be allowed for the taxable year of the transfer (or for an earlier taxable year) determined after the application of the economic performance rules. If these requirements are satisfied, a taxpayer may deduct the liability in the taxable year of the transfer.
On November 19, 2003, the Service and Treasury Department filed with the Federal Register proposed (REG–136890–02) and temporary (T.D. 9095) regulations under § 461(f). Section 1.461–2T(c)(1) of these temporary regulations, which replaces and restates § 1.461–2(c)(1), provides that a transfer for the satisfaction of an asserted liability is a transfer of money or property beyond the taxpayer’s control to: (1) the person asserting the liability; (2) an escrowee or trustee pursuant to a written agreement (among the escrowee or trustee, the taxpayer, and the person who is asserting the liability) providing that the money or other property be delivered in accordance with the settlement of the contest; (3) an escrowee or trustee pursuant to an order of a court or government entity providing that the money or other property be delivered in accordance with the settlement of the contest; or (4) a court with jurisdiction over the contest. An account is in the taxpayer’s control unless the taxpayer has relinquished all authority over the money or other property transferred.
Section 1.461–2T(c)(1)(iii) provides that the following actions are not transfers to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability: (1) the purchase of a bond to guarantee payment of the asserted liability; (2) an entry on the taxpayer’s books of account; and (3) a transfer to an account in the taxpayer’s control. The temporary regulations clarify that a transfer in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953,
2002–2 C.B. 690 (transactions involving the use of a straddle, an S corporation or a partnership, and one or more transitory shareholders or partners to claim a loss while deferring an offsetting gain are substantially similar to transactions described in Notice 2002–50); and Notice 2003–54, 2003–33 I.R.B. 363 (transactions involving the use of economically offsetting positions, one or more tax indifferent parties, and the common trust fund accounting rules of § 584 to allow a taxpayer to claim a noneconomic loss are substantially similar to transactions described in Notice 2002–50 and Notice 2002–65); (18) Rev. Rul. 2002–69, 2002–2 C.B. 760, modifying and superseding Rev. Rul. 99–14, 1999–1 C.B. 835 (transactions in which a taxpayer purports to lease property and then purports to immediately sublease it back to the lessor (that is, leasein/lease-out or LILO transactions) (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (19) Notice 2002–70, 2002–2 C.B. 765 (transactions involving reinsurance arrangements between a taxpayer and the taxpayer’s own reinsurance company that is subject to little or no federal income tax (identified as “listed transactions” on October 15, 2002));
(20) Rev. Rul. 2003–6, 2003–3 I.R.B. 286 (certain arrangements involving the transfer of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) that hold stock in an S corporation for the purpose of claiming eligibility for the delayed effective date of § 409(p) (identified as “listed transactions” on December 17, 2002));
(21) Notice 2003–22, 2003–18 I.R.B. 851 (certain arrangements involving leasing companies that have been used to avoid or evade federal income and employment taxes (identified as “listed transactions” on April 4, 2003));
(22) Notice 2003–24, 2003–18 I.R.B. 853 (certain arrangements that purportedly qualify as collectively-bargained welfare benefit funds excepted from the account limits of §§ 419 and 419A (identified as “listed transactions” on April 11, 2003));
(23) Notice 2003–47, 2003–30 I.R.B. 132 (transactions involving compensatory stock options and related persons to avoid or evade federal income and employment taxes (identified as “listed transactions” on July 1, 2003)); and
(24) Notice 2003–55, 2003–34 I.R.B. 395 (transactions in which one participant claims to realize rental or other income from property or service contracts and another participant claims the deductions related to that income (often referred to as “lease strips”), modifying and superseding Notice 95–53, 1995–2 C.B. 334 (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)). Notice 2001–51 is supplemented and superseded. For updates to this list, go to the IRS web page at www.irs.gov/busi- nesses/corporations and click on Abusive Tax Shelters and Transactions. Notices and other published guidance will still be used to identify transactions that have been determined by the Service to be “listed transactions.”
The principal author of this notice is Michael J. Goldman of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr. Goldman at (202) 622–3080 (not a toll-free call).
Transfers to Trusts to Provide for the Satisfaction of Contested Liabilities
Notice 2003–77
The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department are aware of certain transactions that use contested liability trusts improperly to attempt to accelerate deductions for contested liabilities under § 461(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. This notice alerts taxpayers and their representatives that these transactions are tax avoidance transactions and identifies these transactions, and substantially similar transactions, as listed transactions for purposes of § 1.6011–4(b)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations and §§ 301.6111–2(b)(2) and 301.6112–1(b)(2) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations. This notice also alerts parties involved with these transactions of certain responsibilities that may arise from their involvement with these transactions.
December 8, 2003 1182 2003-49 I.R.B.
to a trust purported to be established under § 461(f) to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability and retains any one or more of the following powers over the money or other property transferred: to pay any liabilities ultimately due to the claimant out of assets other than those transferred to the trust; to substitute money or other property for property transferred to the trust; to prohibit payment to the claimant by the trustee until instructed by the taxpayer; to prohibit notification to the claimant of the trust’s establishment; to limit the trustee’s ability to sell the property after it is transferred to the trust; and to limit the trustee’s ability to enforce notes or rights relating to other property transferred to the trust;
(2) transactions in which a taxpayer transfers any indebtedness of the taxpayer or any promise by the taxpayer to provide services or property in the future in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954, to a trust purported to be established under § 461(f) to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability;
(3) transactions in which a taxpayer using an accrual method of accounting transfers money or other property after July 18, 1984, to a trust purported to be established under § 461(f) to provide for the satisfaction of a workers compensation or tort liability (unless the trust is the person to which the liability is owed, or payment to the trust discharges the taxpayer’s liability to the claimant);
(4) transactions in which a taxpayer using an accrual method of accounting transfers money or other property in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991, to a trust purported to be established under § 461(f) to provide for the satisfaction of a liability for which payment is economic performance under § 1.461–4(g) (unless the trust is the person to which the liability is owed, or payment to the trust discharges the taxpayer’s liability to the claimant), other than a liability for workers compensation or tort; and
(5) transactions in which a taxpayer transfers stock issued by the taxpayer, or indebtedness or stock issued by a party related to the taxpayer (as defined in § 267(b)), on or after November 19, 2003, to a trust purported to be established under § 461(f) to provide for the satisfaction of any asserted liability.
and ending after August 16, 1954, of any indebtedness of a taxpayer or any promise by the taxpayer to provide services or property in the future is not a transfer to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability. In addition, the temporary regulations provide the express rule that a transfer (other than to the person asserting the liability) of a taxpayer’s stock, or the indebtedness or stock of a person related to the taxpayer (as defined in section 267(b)), is not a transfer to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability.
Section 461(h)(2)(C) provides that, if a workers compensation or tort liability requires a payment to another person, then economic performance occurs as payments to the person are made. The Conference Report accompanying enactment of § 461(h) states:
In the case of workers’ compensation or tort liabilities of the taxpayer requiring payments to another person, economic performance occurs as payments are made to that person. Since payment to a section 461(f) trust is not a payment to the claimant and does not discharge the taxpayer’s liability to the claimant, such payment does not satisfy the economic performance test. H. R. Rep. No. 861, 98 th Cong., 2d Sess. 871, 876 (1984). Section 461(h)(2)(D) provides that in the case of other liabilities, economic performance occurs at the time determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary. Section 1.461–4(g)(2) through (7) describes other liabilities for which payment is economic performance.
Section 1.461–4(g)(1)(ii)(A) provides that payment does not include the furnishing of a note or other evidence of indebtedness of the taxpayer.
Section 1.461–4(g)(1)(i) provides that, for certain liabilities for which payment is economic performance, economic performance does not occur as a taxpayer makes payments in connection with the liability to any other person, including a trust, escrow account, court-administered fund, or any similar arrangement, unless the payments constitute payment to the person to which the liability is owed. In Maxus Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries v. United States, 31 F.3d 1135, 1144, 1145 (Fed. Cir. 1994), the taxpayer’s payment to a settlement fund effectively constituted
payment to the person to which the liability was owed because the claimants agreed to look solely to the fund to satisfy their claims and, therefore, the taxpayer’s payment to the fund discharged its liability to the claimant.
Section 1.461–2T(e)(2) provides that, except as provided in § 468B or the regulations thereunder, economic performance does not occur when a taxpayer transfers money or other property to a trust, escrow account, or court to provide for the satisfaction of a contested workers compensation, tort, or other liability designated in § 1.461–4(g) unless the trust, escrow account, or court is the claimant or the taxpayer’s payment to the trust, escrow account, or court discharges the taxpayer’s liability to the claimant.
ANALYSIS
The Service and Treasury Department have become aware of transactions in which taxpayers have established trusts purported to qualify under § 461(f), but that fail to comply with the requirements of § 461(f) or the regulations by reason of: (1) retention of powers over the trust assets (such as the power to substitute assets, to pay the contested liabilities out of assets other than those in the trust, or to limit the trustee’s ability to sell the taxpayer’s assets that the taxpayer transferred to the trust), contrary to the requirement that the taxpayer relinquish control over the property transferred; (2) transfer to the trust of related party notes under circumstances indicating the liability is not genuine or that there is no intent between the parties to enforce the obligation, which is not a valid transfer to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability; or (3) establishment of trusts for contested tort, workers compensation, or other liabilities designated in § 1.461–4(g), for which economic performance requires payment to the claimant.
Transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the following transactions are identified as “listed transactions” for purposes of §§ 1.6011–4(b)(2), 301.6111–2(b)(2) and 301.6112–1(b)(2): (1) transactions in which a taxpayer transfers money or other property in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954,
2003-49 I.R.B. 1183 December 8, 2003
transactions covered by the provisions (including the effective date provisions) of the disclosure, tax shelter registration, and list maintenance requirements under §§ 6011, 6111, and 6112 and the regulations thereunder will be subject to those requirements.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is Norma Rotunno of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting). For further information regarding this notice, contact Ms. Rotunno at (202) 622–7900 (not a toll-free number).
Independent of their classification as “listed transactions,” transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the transactions described in this notice may already be subject to the disclosure requirements of § 6011 (§ 1.6011–4), the tax shelter registration requirements of § 6111 (§§ 301.6111–1T, 301.6111–2), or the list maintenance requirements of § 6112 (§ 301.6112–1). Persons required to register these tax shelters under § 6111 who have failed to do so may be subject to the penalty under § 6707(a). Persons required to maintain lists of investors under § 6112 who have failed to do so (or who fail to provide such lists when requested by the Service) may be subject to the penalty under § 6708(a). In addition, the
Service may impose penalties on parties involved in these transactions or substantially similar transactions, including the accuracy-related penalty under § 6662.
Transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the transactions described in this notice are identified as “listed transactions” for purposes of §§ 1.6011–4(b)(2), 301.6111–2(b)(2) and 301.6112–1(b)(2) effective November 19, 2003, the date this notice is released to the public. The references to specific taxable years and dates in the description of transactions covered by this notice are intended to provide consistency with the temporary and proposed regulations under § 461(f) filed with the Federal Register on November 19, 2003. Only those
26 CFR 601.602: Tax forms and instructions. (Also, Part I, §§ 1, 23, 24, 25A, 32, 42, 59, 62, 63, 68, 132, 135, 137, 146, 151, 170, 179, 213, 220, 221, 512, 513, 685, 877, 2032A, 2503, 2523, 4261, 6033, 6039F, 6323, 6334, 6601, 7430, 7702B)
Rev. Proc. 2003–85
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code