Skip to content

Introduction

SECTION 4. EXAMPLES

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-4 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

.01 Organization A is exempt from federal income tax under § 501(a) as an organization described in § 501(c)(3). Organization A has a dissolution clause in its articles of organization that satisfies Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)–1(b)(4). Organization A’s articles state that, upon dissolution, any assets remaining after the payment of debts and the satisfaction of liabilities are to be distributed (1) to an organization described in § 501(c)(3) for one or more exempt purposes, or (2) to the United States government, or to a State or local government, for a public purpose. Organization A requests a letter ruling that its income is excluded from gross income under § 115(1). Although the dissolution clause in the articles of Organization A meets the organizational requirements of § 501(c)(3), the dissolution clause allows for distribution to entities to which distributions may not be made under § 115(1). The dissolution clause, therefore, fails to satisfy the distribution of assets upon dissolution requirement of the accrual test of § 115(1). In these circumstances, a favorable ruling on § 115(1) would not be issued.

.02 Organization B is exempt from federal income tax under § 501(a) as an organization described in § 501(c)(3). Organization B has a dissolution clause in its articles of organization that satisfies Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)–1(b)(4). Organization B’s articles state that, upon dissolution, any assets remaining after the payment of debts and the satisfaction of liabilities are to be distributed either (1) to a State or political subdivision thereof for a public purpose or (2) for one or more exempt purposes to an organization described in § 501(c)(3) and whose income is also excludable from gross income under § 115(1). Organization B requests a letter ruling that its income is excluded from gross income under § 115(1). The dissolution clause in the articles of Organization B meets the requirements of the organizational test of § 501(c)(3) and also satisfies the distribution of assets upon dissolution requirement of the accrual test of § 115(1).

.03 Organization C is exempt from federal income tax under § 501(a) as an organization described in § 501(c)(3). Upon

January 27, 2003 317 2003–4 I.R.B.

cedure, when used in conjunction with IRA language described in section 3.02 below, is a reasonable, good-faith interpretation of the statute.

.02 In addition to the sample plan amendment in the Appendix, a plan that intends to comply with Code § 408(q) must also contain language that satisfies § 408 or 408A, relating to traditional and Roth IRAs, respectively. The Service provides sample language (a “Listing of Required Modifications,” or “LRMs”) that satisfies §§ 408 and 408A on the Service’s Web Site at www.irs.gov/ep. A plan will satisfy the “reasonable, good-faith interpretation of the statute” requirement with respect to IRA language if the language addresses every applicable point in the IRA LRMs.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this revenue procedure is Roger Kuehnle of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this revenue procedure, please contact Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance telephone service at 1–877–829– 5500 (a toll-free number), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. Mr. Kuehnle can be reached at 202–283–9888 (not a tollfree number).

that if a qualified employer plan elects to allow employees to make voluntary employee contributions to a separate account or annuity established under the plan, and under the terms of the qualified employer plan such account or annuity meets the applicable requirements of § 408 or 408A for an individual retirement account or annuity, then such account or annuity shall be treated under the Code in the same manner as an IRA and not as a qualified employer plan. The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury expect to issue regulations under Code § 408(q) in the near future.

.02 Notice 2001–42, 2001–2 C.B. 70, provides a remedial amendment period under § 401(b), ending no earlier than the end of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2005, in which any needed retroactive EGTRRA plan amendment may be adopted (the “EGTRRA remedial amendment period”). The availability of the EGTRRA remedial amendment period is conditioned on the timely adoption of a good faith EGTRRA plan amendment.

.03 Notice 2001–57, 2001–2 C.B. 279, provides sample plan amendments that satisfy, in form, the “good faith EGTRRA plan amendment” requirement described in the preceding paragraph. Although not containing a sample plan amendment for deemed IRAs under Code § 408(q), the notice provides that the good faith plan amendment requirement applies to § 408(q).

The notice also provides that, until further notice, the Service will not consider EGTRRA in issuing determination, opinion or advisory letters.

.04 Rev. Proc. 2002–10, 2002–4 I.R.B. 401, requires all prototype sponsors with currently approved IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLE IRA plans to amend these documents and submit applications for opinion letters on the amended documents by December 31, 2002.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-4

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.