Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2002-17 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States
changed 70 percent to 50 percent. Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1989, P.L. 101–239, § 7108(j). Except as otherwise provided, § 103 provides that gross income does not include interest on any state or local bond. An exception under § 103(b)(1) is that interest on a private activity bond is included in gross income unless it is a qualified bond within the meaning of § 141. Generally, § 141(e)(2) requires that a qualified bond meet the volume cap requirements of § 146.
Section 146(a) provides that a private activity bond issued as part of an issue meets the volume cap requirements if the aggregate face amount of the private activity bonds issued pursuant to the issue, when added to the aggregate face amount of tax-exempt private activity bonds previously issued by the issuing authority during the calendar year, does not exceed the authority’s volume cap for the calendar year.
Proceeds is not specifically defined for purposes of § 1.42–1T(f)(1). However, for other purposes of the Code, taxexempt bond proceeds are generally defined to include amounts received from investing proceeds. See § 1.148–1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations. Accordingly, given the similarity of purposes for determining bond proceeds under § 1.42– 1T(f)(1) and the tax-exempt bond provisions of the Code, it is appropriate to treat proceeds for purposes of § 1.42–1T(f)(1) to include amounts received from investing proceeds.
In the present situation, Partnership properly includes the $300,000 amount from investing proceeds to determine if it met the 50-percent aggregate basis test in § 42(h)(4)(B). Because $6 million ($5,700,000 plus $300,000) is greater than 50 percent of the aggregate basis of the building and the land ($11,800,000), Partnership satisfies the 50-percent test in § 42(h)(4)(B).
HOLDING
Amounts received from investing proceeds of tax-exempt bonds are counted toward satisfying the 50-percent aggregate basis test under § 42(h)(4)(B).
Section 25.—Interest on Certain Home Mortgages
26 CFR 1.25–4T: Qualified mortgage credit certifi- cate program (temporary).
Guidance is provided for the use of the national and area median gross income figures by issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates in determining the housing cost/income ratio described in section 143(f)(5) of the Code. See Rev. Proc. 2002–24, page 798.
Section 42.—Low-Income Housing Credit
26 CFR 1.42–1T: Limitation on low-income housing credit allowed with respect to qualified low-income buildings receiving housing credit allocations from a state or local housing credit agency (temporary). (Also §§ 103, 146.)
Low-income housing credit; tax- exempt bond financing . Amounts received from investing proceeds of taxexempt bonds are counted toward satisfying the 50-percent aggregate basis test under section 42(h)(4)(B) of the Code.
Rev. Rul. 2002–21
ISSUE
Are amounts received from investing proceeds of tax-exempt bonds counted toward satisfying the 50-percent aggregate basis test under § 42(h)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code?
FACTS
Partnership was formed to develop and operate in State X a low-income housing building in accordance with § 42. In December 1999, the State X bond-issuing authority (Issuer) issued at par $5.7 million of tax-exempt housing bonds, and loaned the $5.7 million to Partnership to finance a portion of the construction of the low-income housing project. Issuer received an allocation of § 146 volume cap in the amount of $5.7 million for the bonds. Principal payments on this financing are to be applied within a reasonable period to redeem the bonds.
Partnership’s aggregate basis for the building and the land on which the build
ing is located is $11.8 million. Partnership earned $300,000 in investment earnings from investing the original $5.7 million of proceeds of the bonds. The sum of these amounts, $6 million, was expended on construction of the building.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 42(a) provides for a tax credit for investment in qualified low-income residential rental buildings placed in service after December 31, 1986.
Section 42(h)(1)(A) provides that the amount of credit determined under § 42 for any taxable year with respect to any building shall not exceed the housing credit dollar amount allocated to the building under § 42(h).
Section 42(h)(4)(A) provides that § 42(h)(1) does not apply to any portion of the credit otherwise allowable under § 42(a) which is attributable to eligible basis financed by any obligation the interest on which is exempt from tax under § 103 if—
(i) the obligation is taken into account under § 146, and
(ii) principal payments on the financing are applied within a reasonable period to redeem obligations the proceeds of which were used to provide the financing.
Section 42(h)(4)(B) provides that, if 50 percent or more of the aggregate basis of any building and the land on which the building is located is financed with taxexempt obligations specified in § 42(h)(4)(A), § 42(h)(1) does not apply to any portion of the low-income housing credit allowable under § 42(a) with respect to the building.
Section 1.42–1T(f)(1) of the temporary Income Tax Regulations provides that no housing credit allocation is required in order to claim a credit under § 42 with respect to the entire qualified basis (as defined in § 42(c)) of a qualified lowincome building if 70 percent or more of the aggregate basis of the building and the land on which the building is located is financed with the proceeds of taxexempt bonds which are taken into account for purposes of the volume cap under § 146. The reference to 70 percent in § 1.42–1T(f)(1) has been superseded by an amendment to § 42(h)(4)(B), which
2002–17 I.R.B. 793 April 29, 2002
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue ruling is Jack Malgeri of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Malgeri at (202) 622–3040 (not a toll-free number).
Section 103.—Interest on State and Local Bonds
26 CFR 1.103–1: Interest upon obligations of a state, territory, etc.
Are amounts received from investing proceeds of tax-exempt bonds counted toward satisfying the 50-percent aggregate basis test under § 42(h)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code? See Rev. Rul. 2002– 21, page 793.
Guidance is provided for the use of the national and area median gross income figures by issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates in determining the housing cost/income ratio described in section 143(f)(5) of the Code. See Rev. Proc. 2002–24, page 798.
Section 143.—Mortgage Revenue Bonds: Qualified Mortgage Bond and Qualified Veterans’ Mortgage Bond
26 CFR 6a.103A–2: Qualified mortgage bond.
Guidance is provided for the use of the national and area median gross income figures by issuers of qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates in determining the housing cost/income ratio described in section 143(f)(5) of the Code. See Rev. Proc. 2002–24, page 798.
Section 146.—Volume Cap
Are amounts received from investing proceeds of tax-exempt bonds counted toward satisfying the 50-percent aggregate basis test under § 42(h)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code? See Rev. Rul. 2002– 21, page 793.
Section 167.—Depreciation
If a taxpayer has a depreciable interest in a qualifying vehicle and chooses to account for the cost of original and replacement tires under the original tire capitalization method, are the qualifying vehicle’s tires treated as part of the vehicle for depreciation purposes? See Rev. Proc. 2002–27, page 802.
Section 168.—Accelerated Cost Recovery System
Under the original tire capitalization method, what is the applicable depreciation method, recovery period, and convention for the cost of a qualifying vehicle’s original tires for purposes of § 168 of the Internal Revenue Code? See Rev. Proc. 2002– 27, page 802.
Section 446.—General Rule for Methods of Accounting
26 CFR 1.446.1: General rule for methods of accounting.
If a taxpayer changes its treatment of the cost of a qualifying vehicle’s original and replacement tires to the original tire capitalization method, is this change a change in method of accounting under § 446(e) of the Internal Revenue Code? See Rev. Proc. 2002–27, page 802.
Section 481.—Adjustments Required by Changes in Method of Accounting
26 CFR 1.481–1: Adjustments in general.
If a taxpayer changes its treatment of the cost of a qualifying vehicle’s original and replacement tires to the original tire capitalization method, is an adjustment under § 481 of the Internal Revenue Code taken into account in computing taxable income? See Rev. Proc. 2002–27, page 802.
Section 664.—Charitable Remainder Trusts
26 CFR 1.664–3: Charitable remainder unitrust.
Charitable remainder trusts; quali- fied charitable remainder unitrusts; recipient trusts . This ruling provides that, in three situations, a charitable remainder unitrust may pay the unitrust amounts to a second trust for the life of an individual, who is financially disabled
as defined in section 6511(h)(2)(A) of the Code. In each situation, the use of the unitrust amounts by the second trust is consistent with the manner in which the individual’s own assets would be used, and the individual is, therefore, considered to have received the unitrust amounts directly from the charitable remainder unitrust for purposes of section 664(d)(2)(A).
Rev. Rul. 2002–20
ISSUE
May a trust qualify as a charitable remainder unitrust under § 664 of the Internal Revenue Code, if the unitrust amounts are paid to a separate trust for the life of an individual who is “financially disabled,” as defined in § 6511(h)(2)(A)?
FACTS
An individual concurrently creates Trust A, a trust that otherwise qualifies as a charitable remainder unitrust, and a separate trust, Trust B . Under the governing instrument of Trust A, annual unitrust amounts will be paid to Trust B for the life of C . C is an individual who is financially disabled, that is, C is unable to manage C ’s own financial affairs by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.
Situation 1 . Under the governing instrument of Trust B, a designated portion of the amount it receives from Trust A will be paid to C each month. If, at any time in the sole judgment of the trustee, the monthly payment to C is insufficient to provide adequately for the care, support, and maintenance of C, or is insufficient for the needs of C for any reason, additional amounts will be paid as needed to or on behalf of C from Trust B . Upon C ’s death, the balance remaining in Trust B will be distributed to C ’s estate.
Situation 2 . Under the governing instrument of Trust B, the trustee may make distributions of income and principal, as determined in the trustee’s sole and absolute discretion, for the financial aid and best interests of C in a manner
April 29, 2002 794 2002–17 I.R.B.
The same result would apply if Trust A were a charitable remainder annuity trust.
HOLDING
A trust may qualify as a charitable remainder unitrust under § 664 if the unitrust amounts will be paid for the life of a financially disabled individual to a separate trust that will administer these payments on behalf of that individual and, upon the individual’s death, will distribute the remaining assets either to the individual’s estate or, after reimbursing the state for any Medicaid benefits provided to the individual, subject to the individual’s general power of appointment.
EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE RULINGS
Rev. Rul. 76–270 (1976–2 C.B. 194) which addresses facts covered by Situa- tion 1, is amplified and superseded.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue ruling is Jan Bennett Geier of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Ms. Geier at (202) 622–7830 (not a toll-free call).
Section 1397E.—Credit to Holders of Qualified Zone Academy Bonds
What is the allocation for each State, the District of Columbia, and each possession of the United States of the national limitation amount of Qualified Zone Academy Bonds for calendar year 2002? See Rev. Proc. 2002–25, page 800.
that supplements but does not supplant any governmental benefits otherwise available to C . Upon C ’s death, the balance remaining in Trust B will be distributed to C ’s estate.
Situation 3 . Under the governing instrument of Trust B, the trustee may make distributions of income and principal, as determined in the trustee’s sole and absolute discretion, for the financial aid and best interests of C in a manner that supplements but does not supplant any governmental benefits otherwise available to C . Upon C ’s death, the governing instrument requires the trustee to reimburse the state for the total costs of medical assistance provided to C under the state’s Medicaid plan. C is given a testamentary general power of appointment over the balance remaining in Trust B . If C fails to exercise the power, the balance will be distributed, in equal shares, to C ’s sister and to X, a charitable organization.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
A charitable remainder unitrust is a trust from which a unitrust amount is payable at least annually during its term with an irrevocable remainder interest held for the benefit of charity. Under § 664 (d)(2)(A), the unitrust amount is a fixed percentage (not less than 5 percent and not more than 50 percent) of the net fair market value of the trust assets, valued annually. The unitrust amount is to be paid to one or more persons (at least one of which is not an organization described in § 170(c) and, in the case of individuals, only to an individual who is living at the time of the creation of the trust) for a
term of years (not in excess of 20 years) or for the life or lives of the individual or individuals.
Section 1.664–3(a)(5)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the period for which the unitrust amount is payable begins with the first year of the charitable remainder trust and continues either for the life or lives of a named individual or individuals or for a term of years not to exceed 20 years. Only an individual or an organization described in § 170(c) may receive an amount for the life of an individual.
In general, a charitable remainder unitrust may pay unitrust amounts to a second trust only for a term of 20 years or less. In Situations 1, 2, and 3, the unitrust amounts are payable to Trust B for the life of C, not for a term of years. However, in each of these situations, the sole function of Trust B is to receive and administer the unitrust amounts for the benefit of C, who is unable to manage C ’s own financial affairs by reason of a medically determinable mental or physical impairment. Upon C ’s death, the assets remaining in Trust B will be distributed either to C ’s estate or, after reimbursing the state for any Medicaid benefits provided to C, will be subject to C ’s general power of appointment. In these situations, the use of the assets in Trust B during C ’s life and at C ’s death is consistent with the manner in which C ’s own assets would be used. C, therefore, is considered to have received the unitrust amounts directly from Trust A for purposes of § 664 (d)(2)(A). Accordingly, the term of Trust A may be for the life of C and is not limited to a term of years.
2002–17 I.R.B. 795 April 29, 2002
Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.
Ask AI about this code