Skip to content

bulletin Internal Revenue›Introduction

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE

Internal Revenue Bulletin 2001-34 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

This revenue procedure applies to tax or revenue anticipation bonds sold after August 20, 2001.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal authors of this revenue procedure are Rose M. Weber and Timothy L. Jones of Office of the Division

Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in the development of this revenue procedure. For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Rose M. Weber or Timothy L. Jones at (202) 6223980 (not a toll-free call).

Relief From Late Allocation of GST Exemption

Notice 2001–50

PURPOSE

This notice provides guidance regarding requests for an extension of time to make an allocation of generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption under § 2642(b)(1) and (2) of the Internal Revenue Code in view of the enactment of § 2642(g) by The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (the Act). Pub. L. 107–16, § 564, 115 Stat. 91. This notice also provides guidance regarding requests for an extension of time to make elections under § 2632(b)(3) and § 2632(c)(5) as added by § 561(a) of the Act.

BACKGROUND

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. Each individual is allowed a GST exemption that may be allocated to transfers that would be subject to the GST tax. In general, an individual’s GST exemption may be allocated to transfers at any time on or before the due date for filing the federal estate tax return for the individual’s estate under § 2632(a)(1).

For lifetime transfers, available GST exemption is automatically allocated to a direct skip under § 2632(b), and to indirect skips made after December 31, 2000, under § 2632(c), unless the individual elects out of the automatic allocation under § 2632(b)(3) and § 2632(c)(5), respectively. Under § 2632(c)(3)(A), an indirect skip is a transfer of property, subject to gift tax, to a GST trust as defined in § 2632(c) (3)(B). An individual may elect to treat any trust as a GST trust under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(ii).

2001–34 I.R.B. 189 August 20, 2001

(3) Notice 95–53, 1995–2 C.B. 334 (certain multiple-party transactions intended to allow one party to realize rental or other income from property or service contracts and to allow another party to report deductions related to that income

Under § 26.2632–1(b)(1)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations, the election out of the automatic allocation for direct skips must be made on a timely filed federal gift tax return. The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service will issue regulations providing that the election out of the automatic allocation for indirect skips and the election to treat any trust as a GST trust must also be made on a timely filed federal gift tax return.

Under § 2642(b)(1) and § 26.2642– 2(a)(1), with respect to lifetime transfers, the value of the property to which the GST exemption is allocated is its value at the date of the transfer if the GST exemption is automatically allocated or is allocated on a timely filed federal gift tax return. Under § 2642(b)(3), if the allocation is not made on a timely filed gift tax return, the value of the property to which the exemption is allocated is its value on the effective date of the allocation as described in § 26.2642–2(a)(2).

Section 2642(b)(2) describes allocations with respect to transfers at death and provides that the value of property to which the GST exemption is allocated is its value as determined for estate tax purposes. The allocation of the GST exemption to transfers at death may be made by the executor at any time prior to the due date of the federal estate tax return under § 26.2632–1(a). Unused GST exemption that has not been allocated by the executor is automatically allocated to transfers at death and lifetime transfers for which no allocation had previously been made as prescribed in § 2632(e)(1).

Section 2642(g)(1)(A), added by § 564(a) of the Act, authorizes the Treasury Department to issue regulations prescribing the circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of the GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) and (2) or to make an election under § 2632(b)(3) and (c)(5). Section 2642(g) (1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation or election is to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. If an extension of time is granted to make the allocation, then the gift or estate tax value of the transfer to the trust is used to determine the allocation of the GST exemption. H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 84,

107 th Cong., 1 st Sess. 202 (2001). Under § 564(b) of the Act, the provisions of § 2642(g)(1) apply to requests for relief pending on, or filed after, December 31, 2000.

REQUESTS FOR RELIEF UNDER § 2642(g)(1)

Section 301.9100–3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100–1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. Therefore, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100–3.

In general, under § 301.9100–3, relief will be granted if the taxpayer establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Taxpayers requesting relief should follow the procedures for requesting a private letter ruling under § 301.9100 contained in section 5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2001–1 (or its successor), 2001–1 I.R.B. 1, 13.

EFFECTIVE DATE

This notice is effective with respect to requests for relief pending on, or filed after, December 31, 2000.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice is William L. Blodgett of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr. Blodgett at (202) 622-3090 (not a toll-free call).

Listed Transactions Update

Notice 2001–51

On February 28, 2000, the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2000–15, 2000–12 I.R.B. 826, identifying certain transactions as “listed transactions” for purposes of § 1.6011–4T(b)(2) of the temporary Income Tax Regulations and § 301.6111–2T(b)(2) of the temporary Procedure and Administration Regulations. This notice restates the list of transactions identified in Notice 2000–15 as “listed transactions” effective February 28, 2000, and updates the list by adding transactions identified in notices released subsequent to February 28, 2000.

Transactions that are the same as or substantially similar to transactions described in the list below have been determined by the Service to be tax avoidance transactions and are identified as “listed transactions” for purposes of § 1.6011– 4T(b)(2) and § 301.6111–2T(b)(2). As a result, corporate taxpayers may need to disclose their participation in these listed transactions as prescribed in § 1.6011–4T, and promoters (or other persons responsible for registering tax shelter transactions) may need to register these transactions under § 301.6111–2T. In addition, promoters must maintain lists of investors and other information with respect to these listed transactions pursuant to § 301.6112–1T.

(1) Rev. Rul. 90–105, 1990–2 C.B. 69 (transactions in which taxpayers claim deductions for contributions to a qualified cash or deferred arrangement or matching contributions to a defined contribution plan where the contributions are attributable to compensation earned by plan participants after the end of the taxable year (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));

(2) Notice 95–34, 1995–1 C.B. 309 (certain trust arrangements purported to qualify as multiple employer welfare benefit funds exempt from the limits of §§ 419 and 419A of the Internal Revenue Code (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));

August 20, 2001 190 2001–34 I.R.B.

(often referred to as “lease strips”) (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (4) Transactions described in Part II of Notice 98–5, 1998–1 C.B. 334 (transactions in which the reasonably expected economic profit is insubstantial in comparison to the value of the expected foreign tax credits (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));

(5) Transactions substantially similar to those at issue in ASA Investerings Part- nership v. Commissioner, 201 F.3d 505 (D.C. Cir. 2000), and ACM Partnership v. Commissioner, 157 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 1998) (transactions involving contingent installment sales of securities by partnerships in order to accelerate and allocate income to a tax-indifferent partner, such as a tax-exempt entity or foreign person, and to allocate later losses to another partner (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));

(6) Treas. Reg. § 1.643(a)–8 (transactions involving distributions described in § 1.643(a)–8 from charitable remainder trusts (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));

(7) Rev. Rul. 99–14, 1999–1 C.B. 835 (transactions in which a taxpayer purports to lease property and then purports to immediately sublease it back to the lessor (that is, lease-in/lease-out or LILO transactions) (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000));

(8) Notice 99–59, 1999–2 C.B. 761 (transactions involving the distribution of encumbered property in which taxpayers claim tax losses for capital outlays that they have in fact recovered (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (9) Treas. Reg. § 1.7701(l)–3, (transactions involving fast-pay arrangements as defined in § 1.7701(l)–3(b) (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (10) Rev. Rul. 2000–12, 2000–11 I.R.B. 744 (certain transactions involving the acquisition of two debt instruments the values of which are expected to change significantly at about the same time in opposite directions (identified as “listed transactions” on February 28, 2000)); (11) Notice 2000–44, 2000–36 I.R.B. 255 (transactions generating losses resulting from artificially inflating the basis of

partnership interests (identified as “listed transactions” on August 11, 2000));

(12) Notice 2000–60, 2000–49 I.R.B. 568 (transactions involving the purchase of a parent corporation’s stock by a subsidiary, a subsequent transfer of the purchased parent stock from the subsidiary to the parent’s employees, and the eventual liquidation or sale of the subsidiary (identified as “listed transactions” on November 16, 2000));

(13) Notice 2000–61, 2000–49 I.R.B. 569 (transactions purporting to apply § 935 to Guamanian trusts (identified as “listed transactions” on November 21, 2000)); (14) Notice 2001–16, 2001–9 I.R.B. 730 (transactions involving the use of an intermediary to sell the assets of a corporation (identified as “listed transactions” on January 18, 2001));

(15) Notice 2001–17, 2001–9 I.R.B. 730 (transactions involving a loss on the sale of stock acquired in a purported § 351 transfer of a high basis asset to a corporation and the corporation’s assumption of a liability that the transferor has not yet taken into account for federal income tax purposes (identified as “listed transactions” on January 18, 2001)); and

(16) Notice 2001–45, 2001–33 I.R.B. 129 (certain redemptions of stock in transactions not subject to U.S. tax in which the basis of the redeemed stock is purported to shift to a U.S. taxpayer (identified as “listed transactions” on July 26, 2001)). Notice 2000–15 is supplemented and superseded.

The principal author of this notice is David A. Shulman of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr. Shulman at (202) 622-3080 (not a tollfree call).

26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. (Also Part I, §§ 61, 83, 721; 1.721–1.)

Rev. Proc 2001–43

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2001-34

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.