Part I. Rulings — Internal Revenue Bulletin 2000-25

suant to a written agreement binding on that date. Notice 2000–1 further provides that the proposed regulations, when finalized, will adopt this effective date rule and that taxpayers may rely on Notice 2000–1 until final regulations are issued. Accordingly, the final regulations adopt this effective date rule.

Finally, Notice 2000–1 provides that taxpayers may request a private letter ruling permitting them to apply the final regulations to transactions occurring on or after June 11, 1999 (the date the proposed regulations were filed with the Federal Register) to which the final regulations would not otherwise apply, and for which there was not a written agreement (subject to customary conditions) binding on June 11, 1999 and at all times thereafter. The Notice cautions, however, that a private letter ruling will not be issued unless the taxpayer establishes to the satisfaction of the IRS that there is not a significant risk of different parties to the transaction taking inconsistent positions, for U.S. tax purposes, with respect to the applicability of the final regulations to the transaction. Any such requests for a ruling will continue to be considered.

Extension of the Repeal of the Bausch & Lomb Doctrine to “B” Reorganizations

A comment was received requesting that the IRS reconsider its position in Rev. Rul. 69–294 (1969–1 C.B. 110), where the Bausch & Lomb doctrine was applied to disqualify a purported section 368(a)(1)(B) reorganization that followed a tax-free section 332 liquidation. In Rev. Rul. 69–294, X owned all of the stock of Y and Y owned 80 percent of the stock of Z. Y completely liquidated into X in a section 332 liquidation. As part of the plan, X (now owning 80 percent of the stock of Z) acquired the minority 20 percent stock interest in Z in exchange for X voting stock in a purported “B” reorganization. The ruling holds that the exchange with the 20 percent minority shareholders was not a “B” reorganization. The rationale is that although the acquisition from the minority shareholders was “solely for voting stock,” the liquidation of Y, as part of the same plan, resulted in X acquiring 80 percent of the Z stock in exchange for Y stock surrendered back to Y on the liqui

Section 368.—Definitions Relating to Corporate Reorganizations

26 CFR 1.368–2: Definition of terms.

T.D. 8885

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1

The Solely for Voting Stock Requirement in Certain Corporate Reorganizations

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulation.

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the solely for voting stock requirement in certain corporate reorganizations under section 368(a)(1)(C). The final regulations provide that a prior acquisition of a target corporation’s stock by an acquiring corporation generally will not prevent the solely for voting stock requirement in a “C” reorganization of the target corporation and the acquiring corporation from being satisfied. They affect persons engaging in certain transactions occurring after December 31, 1999.

DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective May 19, 2000. Applicability Date: These regulations apply to transactions occurring after December 31, 1999, unless the transaction occurs pursuant to a written agreement that is (subject to customary conditions) binding on that date and at all times thereafter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marnie Rapaport, (202) 622-7550 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On June 14, 1999, the IRS and Treasury issued a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (REG–115086–98, 1999–26 I.R.B. 6 [64 F.R. 31770]) setting forth rules relating to the solely for voting stock requirement in reorganizations under

section 368(a)(1)(C). The proposed regulations provided that prior ownership of stock of a target corporation by an acquiring corporation will not by itself prevent the solely for voting stock requirement of a “C” reorganization from being satisfied. The regulations propose to reverse the IRS’s previous position that the acquisition of assets of a partially controlled subsidiary does not qualify as a tax-free “C” reorganization. See Rev. Rul. 54–396 (1954–2 C.B. 147). This position subsequently was sustained in litigation in Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. v. Commis- sioner, 267 F.2d 75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 835 (1959) (the Bausch & Lomb doctrine). A public hearing regarding these proposed regulations was held on October 5, 1999. Written comments to the notice were received. After consideration of all the comments, the proposed regulations are adopted as revised by this Treasury decision.

Explanation of Revisions and Summary of Comments

The Applicability Date

The proposed regulations apply to transactions occurring after the date that a Treasury decision adopting the regulations is published in the Federal Register, except that they do not apply to any transactions occurring pursuant to a written agreement which is (subject to customary conditions) binding on the date that the regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal Register, and at all times thereafter.

A commentator requested that taxpayers be allowed to apply the proposed regulations to transactions occurring before the proposed regulations are published as final regulations.

The IRS and Treasury Department determined that the increased flexibility that results from the proposed regulations should be available to taxpayers in structuring transactions before their publication as final regulations. Accordingly, the IRS and the Treasury Department issued Notice 2000–1 (2000–2 I.R.B. 288), which changes the proposed effective date of the proposed regulations to apply to any transactions occurring after December 31, 1999, unless the transaction occurs pur

June 19, 2000 1260 2000–25 I.R.B.

dation of Y and not solely in exchange for X voting stock.

The commentator’s suggestion is beyond the scope of this regulations project, which relates to “C” reorganizations. In light of these regulations, the IRS and Treasury Department may reconsider Rev. Rul. 69–294.

Effect on Other Documents

The following publication is obsolete as of January 1, 2000: Rev. Rul. 54–396 (1954–2 C.B. 147).

Special Analyses

It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations and, because these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, these regulations were submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business.

Drafting Information

The principal author of these regulations is Marnie Rapaport of the Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), IRS. However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.

Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations

Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:

PART 1—INCOME TAXES

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to

read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Par. 2. Section 1.368–2 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows: §1.368–2 Definition of terms.

(d) * * * (4) (i) For purposes of paragraphs (d)(1) and (2)(ii) of this section, prior ownership of stock of the target corporation by an acquiring corporation will not by itself prevent the solely for voting stock requirement of such paragraphs from being satisfied. In a transaction in which the acquiring corporation has prior ownership of stock of the target corporation, the requirement of paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section is satisfied only if the sum of the money or other property that is distributed in pursuance of the plan of reorganization to the shareholders of the target corporation other than the acquiring corporation and to the creditors of the target corporation pursuant to section 361(b)(3), and all of the liabilities of the target corporation assumed by the acquiring corporation (including liabilities to which the properties of the target corporation are subject), does not exceed 20 percent of the value of all of the properties of the target corporation. If, in connection with a potential acquisition by an acquiring corporation of substantially all of a target corporation’s properties, the acquiring corporation acquires the target corporation’s stock for consideration other than the acquiring corporation’s own voting stock (or voting stock of a corporation in control of the acquiring corporation if such stock is used in the acquisition of the target corporation’s properties), whether from a shareholder of the target corporation or the target corporation itself, such consideration is treated, for purposes of paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, as money or other property exchanged by the acquiring corporation for the target corporation’s properties. Accordingly, the transaction will not qualify under section 368(a)(1)(C) unless, treating such consideration as money or other property, the requirements of section 368(a)(2)(B) and paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section are met. The determination of whether there has been an acquisition in connection with a potential reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(C) of a target corporation’s stock for consideration other than an acquiring corporation’s own voting stock (or voting stock of a corporation in control of the acquiring corporation if such stock is used in the acquisition of the target corporation’s properties) will

be made on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances.

(ii) The following examples illustrate the principles of this paragraph (d)(4):

Example 1 . Corporation P (P) holds 60 percent of the Corporation T (T) stock that P purchased several years ago in an unrelated transaction. T has 100 shares of stock outstanding. The other 40 percent of the T stock is owned by Corporation X (X), an unrelated corporation. T has properties with a fair market value of $110 and liabilities of $10. T transfers all of its properties to P. In exchange, P assumes the $10 of liabilities, and transfers to T $30 of P voting stock and $10 of cash. T distributes the P voting stock and $10 of cash to X and liquidates. The transaction satisfies the solely for voting stock requirement of paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section because the sum of $10 of cash paid to X and the assumption by P of $10 of liabilities does not exceed 20% of the value of the properties of T. Example 2 . The facts are the same as in Example 1 except that P purchased the 60 shares of T for $60 in cash in connection with the acquisition of T’s assets. The transaction does not satisfy the solely for voting stock requirement of paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section because P is treated as having acquired all of the T assets for consideration consisting of $70 of cash, $10 of liability assumption and $30 of P voting stock, and the sum of $70 of cash and the assumption by P of $10 of liabilities exceeds 20% of the value of the properties of T.

(iii) This paragraph (d)(4) applies to transactions occurring after December 31, 1999, unless the transaction occurs pursuant to a written agreement that is (subject to customary conditions) binding on that date and at all times thereafter.

Approved May 9, 2000.

Jonathan Talisman, Deputy Assistant Secretary

of the Treasury.

(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on May 18, 2000, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 19, 2000, 65 F.R. 31805)

Section 6621.— Determination of Interest Rate

26 CFR 301.6621–1: Interest rate.

Interest rates; underpayments and overpayments. The rate of interest determined under section 6621 of the Code for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2000, will be 9 percent for overpayments (8 percent in the case of a corporation), 9

David A. Mader, Acting Deputy Commissioner

of Internal Revenue.

2000–25 I.R.B. 1261 June 19, 2000

month of April 2000 is 6 percent. Accordingly, an overpayment rate of 9 percent (8 percent in the case of a corporation) and an underpayment rate of 9 percent are established for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2000. The overpayment rate for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2000, is 6.5 percent. The underpayment rate for large corporate underpayments for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2000, is 11 percent. These rates apply to amounts bearing interest during that calendar quarter.

Interest factors for daily compound interest for annual rates of 6.5 percent, 8 percent, 9 percent, and 11 percent are published in Tables 66, 69, 71, and 75 of Rev. Proc. 95–17, 1995–1 C.B. 556, 620, 623, 625, and 629. Annual interest rates to be compounded daily pursuant to § 6622 that apply for prior periods are set forth in the tables accompanying this revenue ruling.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this revenue ruling is Raymond Bailey of the Office of Assistant Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). For further information regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr. Bailey on (202) 622-6226 (not a toll-free call).

percent for underpayments, and 11 percent for large corporate underpayments. The rate of interest paid on the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000 is 6.5 percent.

Rev. Rul. 2000–30

Section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code establishes the rates for interest on tax overpayments and tax underpayments. Under § 6621(a)(1), the overpayment rate beginning July 1, 2000, is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points (2 percentage points in the case of a corporation), except the rate for the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 0.5 of a percentage point for interest computations made after December 31, 1994. Under § 6621(a)(2), the underpayment rate is the sum of the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points.

Section 6621(c) provides that for purposes of interest payable under § 6601 on any large corporate underpayment, the underpayment rate under § 6621(a)(2) is determined by substituting “5 percentage points” for “3 percentage points.” See § 6621(c) and § 301.6621–3 of the Regulations on Procedure and Administration for the definition of a large corporate un

derpayment and for the rules for determining the applicable date. Section 6621(c) and § 301.6621–3 are generally effective for periods after December 31, 1990.

Section 6621(b)(1) provides that the Secretary will determine the federal shortterm rate for the first month in each calendar quarter.

Section 6621(b)(2)(A) provides that the federal short-term rate determined under § 6621(b)(1) for any month applies during the first calendar quarter beginning after such month.

Section 6621(b)(3) provides that the federal short-term rate for any month is the federal short-term rate determined during such month by the Secretary in accordance with § 1274(d), rounded to the nearest full percent (or, if a multiple of 1/2 of 1 percent, the rate is increased to the next highest full percent).

Notice 88–59, 1988–1 C.B. 546, announced that, in determining the quarterly interest rates to be used for overpayments and underpayments of tax under § 6621, the Internal Revenue Service will use the federal short-term rate based on daily compounding because that rate is most consistent with § 6621 which, pursuant to § 6622, is subject to daily compounding.

Rounded to the nearest full percent, the federal short-term rate based on daily compounding determined during the

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES PERIODS BEFORE JUL. 1, 1975 - PERIODS ENDING DEC. 31, 1986

OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS

In 1995–1 C.B. PERIOD RATE DAILY RATE TABLE

Before Jul. 1, 1975 6% Table 2, pg. 557 Jul. 1, 1975—Jan. 31, 1976 9% Table 4, pg. 559 Feb. 1, 1976—Jan. 31, 1978 7% Table 3, pg. 558 Feb. 1, 1978—Jan. 31, 1980 6% Table 2, pg. 557 Feb. 1, 1980—Jan. 31, 1982 12% Table 5, pg. 560 Feb. 1, 1982—Dec. 31, 1982 20% Table 6, pg. 560 Jan. 1, 1983—Jun. 30, 1983 16% Table 37, pg. 591 Jul. 1, 1983—Dec. 31, 1983 11% Table 27, pg. 581 Jan. 1, 1984—Jun. 30, 1984 11% Table 75, pg. 629 Jul. 1, 1984—Dec. 31, 1984 11% Table 75, pg. 629 Jan. 1, 1985—Jun. 30, 1985 13% Table 31, pg. 585 Jul. 1, 1985—Dec. 31, 1985 11% Table 27, pg. 581 Jan. 1, 1986—Jun. 30, 1986 10% Table 25 pg. 579 Jul. 1, 1986—Dec. 31, 1986 9% Table 23, pg. 577

June 19, 2000 1262 2000–25 I.R.B.

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FROM JAN. 1, 1987 - Dec. 31, 1998

OVERPAYMENTS UNDERPAYMENTS

1995–1 C.B. 1995–1 C.B. RATE TABLE PG RATE TABLE PG

Jan. 1, 1987—Mar. 31, 1987 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Apr. 1, 1987—Jun. 30, 1987 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Jul. 1, 1987—Sep. 30, 1987 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Oct. 1, 1987—Dec. 31, 1987 9% 23 577 10% 25 579 Jan. 1, 1988—Mar. 31, 1988 10% 73 627 11% 75 629 Apr. 1, 1988—Jun. 30, 1988 9% 71 625 10% 73 627 Jul. 1, 1988—Sep. 30, 1988 9% 71 625 10% 73 627 Oct. 1, 1988—Dec. 31, 1988 10% 73 627 11% 75 629 Jan. 1, 1989—Mar. 31, 1989 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Apr. 1, 1989—Jun. 30, 1989 11% 27 581 12% 29 583 Jul. 1, 1989—Sep. 30, 1989 11% 27 581 12% 29 583 Oct. 1, 1989—Dec. 31, 1989 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Jan. 1, 1990—Mar. 31, 1990 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Apr. 1, 1990—Jun. 30, 1990 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Jul. 1, 1990—Sep. 30, 1990 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Oct. 1, 1990—Dec. 31, 1990 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Jan. 1, 1991—Mar. 31, 1991 10% 25 579 11% 27 581 Apr. 1, 1991—Jun. 30, 1991 9% 23 577 10% 25 579 Jul. 1, 1991—Sep. 30, 1991 9% 23 577 10% 25 579 Oct. 1, 1991—Dec. 31, 1991 9% 23 577 10% 25 579 Jan. 1, 1992—Mar. 31, 1992 8% 69 623 9% 71 625 Apr. 1, 1992—Jun. 30, 1992 7% 67 621 8% 69 623 Jul. 1, 1992—Sep. 30, 1992 7% 67 621 8% 69 623 Oct. 1, 1992—Dec. 31, 1992 6% 65 619 7% 67 621 Jan. 1, 1993—Mar. 31, 1993 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Apr. 1, 1993—Jun. 30, 1993 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Jul. 1, 1993—Sep. 30, 1993 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Oct. 1, 1993—Dec. 31, 1993 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Jan. 1, 1994—Mar. 31, 1994 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Apr. 1, 1994—Jun. 30, 1994 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Jul. 1, 1994—Sep. 30, 1994 7% 19 573 8% 21 575 Oct. 1, 1994—Dec. 31, 1994 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 1995 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995 9% 23 577 10% 25 579 Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 1995 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 1995 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996 8% 69 623 9% 71 625 Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 1996 7% 67 621 8% 69 623 Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 1996 8% 69 623 9% 71 625 Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 1996 8% 69 623 9% 71 625 Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 1997 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 1997 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 1997 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 1997 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 1998 8% 21 575 9% 23 577 Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 1998 7% 19 573 8% 21 575 Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 1998 7% 19 573 8% 21 575 Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 1998 7% 19 573 8% 21 575

2000–25 I.R.B. 1263 June 19, 2000

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 - PRESENT

NONCORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS

1995–1 C.B. RATE TABLE PAGE

Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 7% 19 573 Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 8% 21 575 Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 8% 21 575 Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 8% 21 575 Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 8% 69 623 Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 9% 71 625 Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 9% 71 625

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 - PRESENT

CORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS

OVERPAYMENTS UNDERPAYMENTS

1995–1 C.B. 1995–1 C.B. RATE TABLE PG RATE TABLE PG

Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 6% 17 571 7% 19 573 Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 7% 19 573 8% 21 575 Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 7% 19 573 8% 21 575 Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 7% 19 573 8% 21 575 Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 7% 67 621 8% 69 623 Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 8% 69 623 9% 71 625 Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 8% 69 623 9% 71 625

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR LARGE CORPORATE UNDERPAYMENTS

FROM JANUARY 1, 1991 - PRESENT

1995–1 C.B. RATE TABLE PG

Jan. 1, 1991—Mar. 31, 1991 13% 31 585 Apr. 1, 1991—Jun. 30, 1991 12% 29 583 Jul. 1, 1991—Sep. 30, 1991 12% 29 583 Oct. 1, 1991—Dec. 31, 1991 12% 29 583 Jan. 1, 1992—Mar. 31, 1992 11% 75 629 Apr. 1, 1992—Jun. 30, 1992 10% 73 627 Jul. 1, 1992—Sep. 30, 1992 10% 73 627 Oct. 1, 1992—Dec. 31, 1992 9% 71 625 Jan. 1, 1993—Mar. 31, 1993 9% 23 577 Apr. 1, 1993—Jun. 30, 1993 9% 23 577 Jul. 1, 1993—Sep. 30, 1993 9% 23 577 Oct. 1, 1993—Dec. 31, 1993 9% 23 577 Jan. 1, 1994—Mar. 31, 1994 9% 23 577

June 19, 2000 1264 2000–25 I.R.B.

Apr. 1, 1994—Jun. 30, 1994 9% 23 577 Jul. 1, 1994—Sep. 30, 1994 10% 25 579 Oct. 1, 1994—Dec. 31, 1994 11% 27 581 Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 1995 11% 27 581 Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995 12% 29 583 Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 1995 11% 27 581 Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 1995 11% 27 581 Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996 11% 75 629 Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 1996 10% 73 627 Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 1996 11% 75 629 Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 1996 11% 75 629 Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 1997 11% 27 581 Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 1997 11% 27 581 Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 1997 11% 27 581 Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 1997 11% 27 581 Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 1998 11% 27 581 Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 1998 10% 25 579 Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 1998 10% 25 579 Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 1998 10% 25 579 Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 9% 23 577 Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 10% 25 579 Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 10% 25 579 Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 10% 25 579 Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 10% 73 627 Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 11% 75 629 Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 11% 75 629

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR CORPORATE

OVERPAYMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000

FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 - PRESENT

1995–1 C.B. RATE TABLE PG

Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 1995 6.5% 18 572 Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995 7.5% 20 574 Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 1995 6.5% 18 572 Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 1995 6.5% 18 572 Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996 6.5% 66 620 Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 1996 5.5% 64 618 Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 1996 6.5% 66 620 Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 1996 6.5% 66 620 Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 1997 6.5% 18 572 Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 1997 6.5% 18 572 Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 1997 6.5% 18 572 Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 1997 6.5% 18 572 Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 1998 6.5% 18 572 Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 1998 5.5% 16 570 Jul. 1. 1998—Sep. 30, 1998 5.5% 16 570 Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 1998 5.5% 16 570 Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 1999 4.5% 14 568 Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 1999 5.5% 16 570 Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 1999 5.5% 16 570 Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 1999 5.5% 16 570 Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 2000 5.5% 64 618 Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 2000 6.5% 66 620 Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 2000 6.5% 66 620

2000–25 I.R.B. 1265 June 19, 2000