Skip to content

Rev. Rul. 99-58

SECTION 11. BANK RESERVES FOR

Internal Revenue Bulletin 1999-52 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

BAD DEBTS (§ 585)

.01 Changing from the § 585 reserve method to the § 166 specific charge-off method.

(1) Description of change and scope.

(a) Applicability . This change applies to a bank (as defined in § 581, in

1999–52 I.R.B. 755 December 27, 1999

(2) Manner of making the change .

SECTION 12A. MARKET DISCOUNT BONDS (§ 1278)

.01 Revocation of § 1278(b) election .

(1) Description of change and scope . This change applies to a taxpayer that wants to change its method of accounting for market discount bonds by revoking its § 1278(b) election. Under § 1278(b), a taxpayer may elect a method of accounting under which market discount is currently included in gross income for the taxable years to which the discount is attributable. See Rev. Proc. 92–67, 1992–2 C.B. 429, for the procedures to make a § 1278(b) election (including a deemed § 1278(b) election). The procedures for revoking a § 1278(b) election were formerly provided in section 7 of Rev. Proc. 92–67. (2) Revocation of election. The revocation of a § 1278(b) election applies to all market discount bonds that are held by the taxpayer on the first day of the first taxable year for which the revocation is effective (year of change), and to all market discount bonds that are subsequently acquired by the taxpayer. If a § 1278(b) election is revoked, then, for purposes of § 1276(a), accrued market discount with respect to any bond previously subject to the election means accrued market discount as defined in § 1276(b) less any market discount included in income while the bond was subject to the § 1278(b) election. (3) Manner of making the change. This change is made using a cut-off method and applies only to market discount accruing on or after the first day of the year of change. Market discount accruing on a bond prior to the year of change was currently included in income and market discount accruing on the bond on and after the first day of the year of change is included in income generally upon disposition of the bond. See § 1276(a). Because cut-off treatment is prescribed for this change, the basis of any bond, adjusted for amounts previously included in income during the period of the election, is not affected by the revocation.

(4) Additional requirements . On a statement attached to the application, the taxpayer must provide:

(a) the reason(s) for revoking the § 1278(b) election (or deemed § 1278(b) election);

(a) This change is made using a cut-off method and applies only to loans described in section 3 of Rev. Proc. 97–39 that were acquired on or after the first day of the year of change. See section 2.06 of this revenue procedure.

(b) The taxpayer must maintain books and records sufficient to satisfy the district director that old and new loans have been adequately segregated.

(3) Additional requirements. On a statement attached to the application, the taxpayer must:

(a) identify the categories of loans to which the new method will apply; and

(b) describe any “additional categories” permitted under section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 97–39.

(4) No audit protection . A taxpayer does not receive audit protection under section 7 of this revenue procedure in connection with this change.

.02 Pool of debt instruments .

(1) Description of change and scope .

daily portions of OID for certain debt instruments subject to prepayments. Under these rules, the daily portions of OID are determined, in part, by taking into account an assumption regarding the prepayment of principal on the debt instruments.

(ii) Section 1004 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, which is effective for taxable years beginning after August 5, 1997, extended the rules in § 1272(a)(6) to any pool of debt instruments the yield on which may be affected by reason of prepayments. In particular, § 1272(a)(6) now applies to a pool of credit card receivables subject to a grace period provision (under which, for example, a credit card issuer does not charge interest for a billing cycle if the credit card obligor pays off its account balance by a specified date, even though the balance is not due on that date). See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 220, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. 522 (1997). (A credit card receivable subject to a grace period provision has OID because none of the stated interest on the receivable is qualified stated interest under § 1.1273–1(c)).

(iii) The holder of a pool of credit card receivables subject to a grace period provision must accrue OID on the pool based on a reasonable assumption regarding the timing of the payments by the obligors of the receivables in the pool. Under §1272(a)(6), it is not reasonable for a holder to assume that all of the obligors will pay their balances by the specified grace period date and, based on this assumption, defer the inclusion of OID until the end of the grace period. If the payments in the pool occur soon after year end and before the holder files its tax return for the taxable year that includes such year end, the holder may accrue OID based on its actual experience rather than based upon a reasonable assumption. If the holder does not accrue OID based on its actual experience, the holder must make an adjustment to its income for the following taxable year to account for any difference between its accrual based on a reasonable assumption and its actual experience.

(2) Additional requirements. On a statement attached to the application, the taxpayer must provide a detailed description of the pool(s) of debt instruments and the proposed method (including the prepayment assumption used for each pool).

(a) Applicability . This change applies to a taxpayer that must change its method of accounting for a pool of debt instruments to comply with § 1272(a)(6) (as required by § 1004 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105–34, 111 Stat. 788, 911), provided the change is for the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning after August 5, 1997.

(b) Scope limitations inapplicable. A taxpayer that must make this change is not subject to the scope limitations in section 4.02 of this revenue procedure. However, if the taxpayer is under examination, before an appeals office, or before a federal court, the taxpayer must provide a copy of the application to the examining agent(s), appeals officer, or counsel for the government, as appropriate, at the same time that it files the copy of the application with the national office. The application must contain the name(s) and telephone number(s) of the examining agent(s), appeals officer, or counsel for the government, as appropriate.

(c) Description.

(i) Under § 1272, the holder of a debt instrument with original issue discount (OID) must include in income the sum of the daily portions of the OID for each day during the taxable year on which the holder held the instrument. Section 1272(a)(6) provides special rules to determine the

December 27, 1999 756 1999–52 I.R.B.

(b) a description of the method by which, and the date on which, the taxpayer made the § 1278(b) election (or deemed § 1278(b) election) that is being revoked; and

(c) a statement that, after the revocation, the taxpayer will not make a constant interest rate election for any bond that has been subject to the § 1278(b) election (or deemed § 1278(b) election) being revoked and for which a constant interest rate election was not effective in the year of acquisition.

(5) Audit protection. A taxpayer receives audit protection under section 7 of this revenue procedure in connection with this change. However, the audit protection applicable to this change does not preclude the Commissioner from examining the method used by the taxpayer to determine the amount of accrued market discount under § 1276(b) for a taxable year prior to the year of change.

.02 Reserved.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 1999-52

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.