Skip to content

Introduction›HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE—Continued

SEC. 2. BACKGROUND

Internal Revenue Bulletin 1996-3 · 2026-10-03 edition · updated 2026-10-04 · United States

Rev. Rul. 82–80, 1982–1 C.B. 89, and Rev. Proc. 65–17, 1965–1 C.B. 833, as amplified, amended, clarified and modified by Rev. Proc. 65–31, 1965–2 C.B. 1024, Rev. Proc. 65–17 Amendment I, 1966–2 C.B. 1211, Rev. Proc. 65–17 Amendment II, 1974–1 C.B. 411, Rev. Proc. 70–23, 1970–2 C.B. 505, Rev. Proc. 71–35, 1971–2 C.B. 573, Rev. Proc. 72–48, 1972–2 C.B. 829, Rev. Proc. 72–53, 1972–2 C.B. 833, and Rev. Proc. 91–24, 1991– 1 C.B. 542, (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Rev. Proc. 65–17’’) provide for the tax-free repatriation of certain amounts following an allocation of income between related U.S. and foreign corporations under section 482 of the Code. Generally, in order to obtain the treatment provided by Rev. Proc. 65– 17, the taxpayer must file a written statement requesting such relief with the appropriate District Director. However, in situations involving a country with which the United States has an income tax convention in force which contains a mutual agreement procedure article (‘‘treaty cases’’), Rev. Proc. 91–

24 provides that the relief provided under Rev. Proc. 65–17 is available only in conjunction with a request for assistance from the U.S. competent authority. This revenue procedure supersedes Rev. Proc. 91–24.

Get a plain-English answer with a citation back to this text.

Ask AI about this code
▸Contents — Internal Revenue Bulletin 1996-3

GoCodebook provides public access, search, citation, multilingual explanation, and practical interpretation of legally adopted building regulations. It is not a substitute for the official ICC or California code publications.